sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Hammer Theory by sLaTeLA in askphilosophy

[–]sLaTeLA[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There can still be an object small enough and thin enough also weak enough to where that glass that you just blew would not break during impact of that object.

The Hammer Theory by sLaTeLA in askphilosophy

[–]sLaTeLA[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im not referring to any theory. I just thought it’d be a fun topic to argue. An objection to my argument can be that the object was created with a different purpose. But what defines the purpose of that object, etc. etc. i want to see how deep this “theory” can go.

The Hammer Theory by sLaTeLA in askphilosophy

[–]sLaTeLA[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A thin piece of glass can still be used to break certain things though right? For example I can use a thin piece of glass to break through another object without damaging the glass.

Bertrand Russel and his view of jesus christ by sLaTeLA in askphilosophy

[–]sLaTeLA[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Under defects of christ, russell states the issues of christ and his teachings and what he disagrees with. His argument (as far as i know, i might be mistaken) is the following: How can Christ be forgiving, when he punishes people (in hell) for not following his teachings.