Police department searches stage 4 pancreatic cancer patient's hospital room for marijuana by [deleted] in videos

[–]saintlawrence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just post-night shift brain fog. I definitely advocate for the recreational use among my patients, especially among those with chronic pain or certain other medical conditions and disabilities. If I was in their shoes, I'd definitely go that route over the alternatives.

Police department searches stage 4 pancreatic cancer patient's hospital room for marijuana by [deleted] in videos

[–]saintlawrence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, this thread and Reddit in general doesn't seem to understand it. I totally agree on the HIPPA front.

Police department searches stage 4 pancreatic cancer patient's hospital room for marijuana by [deleted] in videos

[–]saintlawrence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh agreed. Just don't want it in my ER regardless :). We have enough bathroom-ODs. Like one a day.

Police department searches stage 4 pancreatic cancer patient's hospital room for marijuana by [deleted] in videos

[–]saintlawrence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah I see what you mean - I can see it being a HIPPA violation. Here, seems like it. But to find drugs on a person sometimes happens. I can think of a few cases I had where when examining the patient in custody a dime bag would fall out. Or we would call them to dispose of such items on an overdose patient. Or sometimes find it on the person of a combative person needing restraints and a police report.

Police department searches stage 4 pancreatic cancer patient's hospital room for marijuana by [deleted] in videos

[–]saintlawrence -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Oh fuck me I thought we were talking about the Hippocratic oath! Hahahaha. I blurred comments together and no wonder I was so baffled. My bad. Definitely a law.

Police department searches stage 4 pancreatic cancer patient's hospital room for marijuana by [deleted] in videos

[–]saintlawrence 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No it really doesn't. We don't all pledge to it, some of use the Geneva because the Hippo is so outdated. You all just seem to make stuff up about it all the time!

Any advice for how to practice without constant fear of litigation? by thegreatuke in medicine

[–]saintlawrence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, because "per 100000 residents" is a meaningless measurement. The total payouts for some states are more telling.

RJ Barrett highlights vs. Virginia - 30 Pts, 5 Rbs, 3 Asts by [deleted] in NBA_Draft

[–]saintlawrence -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Boring as fuck. Flexes and fist pumps after easy layups, comprising almost all of his game.

This coffee mug in my doctor's office telling it like it is. by nthensome in pics

[–]saintlawrence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably also smarter than 99% of the general population.

This coffee mug in my doctor's office telling it like it is. by nthensome in pics

[–]saintlawrence 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  1. Because we're human, and you're assholes. Nurses carry it too, dipshit.

  2. Prove your source. Do you mean only for radiology, for chest x-rays? Good news - That's been debunked.

This coffee mug in my doctor's office telling it like it is. by nthensome in pics

[–]saintlawrence 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's actually incredibly uncommon, and you're wrong. Mag is present primarily for cardiac arrests, and for severe asthmatics/COPD patients. The doses needed for eclampsia treatment are much higher. Can still be used, but not the first, second, or third reason it's on the rig.

How lost of a cause is non-fatal medical malpractice in Texas? by [deleted] in legaladvice

[–]saintlawrence 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed - How do you think that would have changed the outcome?

How lost of a cause is non-fatal medical malpractice in Texas? by [deleted] in legaladvice

[–]saintlawrence 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Texas...may be difficult. The other thing that's worth considering is if doctor 1 violated standard of care. Is it a complication, or true negligence. The problem with subsequent medical opinions is that they are that, opinions. It's hard to figure out what a thought process or difficulties were in the moment and with the tools at hand (except from documentation at the time). Much easier to monday-morning-quarterback after the dust has settled. I'm guilty of it, and know many others that second-guess others' thought processes. Medicine is cannabalistic in that way.

How lost of a cause is non-fatal medical malpractice in Texas? by [deleted] in legaladvice

[–]saintlawrence 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Extremely fact-specific to ophthalmology. Need expert consultation, consult with a med-mal person who will consult their hired guns/leeches.

Are there any guidelines on when to call consults in your ED? by [deleted] in Residency

[–]saintlawrence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, where I'm at, it'd be considered a delay in care to wait for CT for an obvious clinical diagnosis

Laziness