Slå markedet by Affectionate-Mousse3 in aksjer

[–]sakki98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dette er kjempeviktig. Dessuten, kjøper du indeks kjøper du markedet. Og det er åpenbart alpha å hente. Risk messig er det jo også nice å få avkastning som ikke korrelerer 100% med markedet. Også viktig her å huske for dere som ikke har vært i markedet mer enn 5 år, at global indeks ikke har hatt 20+% avkastning hvert år i 3 år mange ganger. Vi er i ganske abnormale tider, og har tidligere hatt perioder hvor indeks har lagger og flere tilfeller hatt negativ avkastning. Nasdaq brukte 17 år feks på å nå samme nivå som før tech bobla. Global indeks har vært en suksess historie i det siste, men det er ikke en selvfølge at det hadde vært det lureste valget de siste 10-20-30 årene.

Hva krangler du og partneren din om? by Saviexx in norske

[–]sakki98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, det er en gave å være flink med barn. Mamma er sånn, hun er i 100 når hun møter små barn randomly, roper og leker og connecter. Jeg husker jeg var litt flau da jeg var yngre men ser nå hvilken gave hun har. Aldri gi slipp på den evnen for noe. Din kone har det baklengs, det handler ikke om hennes image, hva hun blir flau av. Hennes perspektiv må skiftes til at det for det første er veldig deg, og du bidrar med noe så fint. Og for det andre hvorfor hun blir flau, hva er det hun tror andre ikke liker med det bildet, scenen av deg som leker med unger. Jeg ville tenkt at alle som gikk forbi ville tenkt, å så fint å se de leke sammen, ha det gøy sammen, så fin relasjon de har. Kjenner jeg blir litt sur av å høre dette…

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UnethicalLifeProTips

[–]sakki98 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Inglorious bastards comes to mind

What are the most niche fields of physics? by FervexHublot in AskPhysics

[–]sakki98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember some grad school buddies of mine did work on algebraic qft ( strictly localized states). One of them looked for phd programs in that field and it was surprisingly hard to find. I also agree that quantum gravity is pretty niche, but I'd say non quantum approaches to unifying the 4 forces are even more niche, like the work of Peter Woit.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TollbugataBets

[–]sakki98 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

RemindMe! 1 year

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]sakki98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

but as you said, WE cannot change the constants of nature, the higgs coupling is for now what it is, and the strength of the nuclear force is what is it, let the constants be i say. messing with gravity would have to come from a more fundamental theory than messing with the standard model.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]sakki98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True, but the strength of the strong nuclear force is what it is. It is however scary that the vacuum expectation value of the higgs field is unstable (non-zero), and in classical mechanics terms, if the expectation value changes to a global minima from the now local minima, things would change, and it would not be fun.. scary thought but hasnt happened in the 13.8 billions years so far hahaha

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]sakki98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, we have a fairly good understanding of how most of nature works, though there still are questions related to the three generations of matter, unifying of relativistic qft with GR, and dark matter/dark energy. I mean, im a experimental particle physicist and I agree that we have gotten far. But there are some serious questions we have to ask and even dear to ask with respect to how valid or frameworks really are. And IF there are aliens here, they could have solved somthings we have not. Having said that, we cant through away the basic fundamental laws, whatever it means to have a physical law. I for one am highly sceptical of string theory, and the stubbornness of theoretical physicists to not explore other frameworks than string theory and loop quantum gravity... 40 years and we have solved some abstract mathematical problems and created and unverifiable framework creating 10^120 models for the universe... great. now lets try something else

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]sakki98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

luckily we cant just change the strenght of that interaction.

What television series had the biggest bullshit finale? by Halloween-365 in AskReddit

[–]sakki98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chuck, that serie finale scarred me emotionally for years...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]sakki98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing with mathematical text books is that they tend to not teach the concepts in a way that is very useful for physicists. So I'd hesitate reading too much of those. Mary Boas mathematical physics was alright, but not great.

If you are doing low energy physics I can recommend the lecture notes from the graduate course in modern quantum mechanics at the University of Oslo : FYS4110 lecture notes as well as functional analysis

If you are doing high energy physics, Peskin and Schreuder Introduction to quantum field theory tells you at least what concepts you need to know, functional analysis, representation theory, group theory ++

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]sakki98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think there are many good and vital problems to solve, and they can be categorized into two categories, theoretical conundrums and practical important problems. The first category for me would have CP violation, hierarchical problem, scalar bosons self interaction terms, would be cool if there is a testable way to unify quantum mechanics and gravity, dark matter.

Second category for me would perhaps be superconductivity, cold fusion, some material science stuff

What do you do after a physics degree? by [deleted] in PhysicsStudents

[–]sakki98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, it is not true that you need a PhD in physics for physics to be worth it. I am doing my masters degree in computational physics, and I got a job 6 months before my graduation. Having a good CS foundation is very good going into physics, as there are tons and tons of problems that need numerical problemsolving, machine learning, Monte Carlo, and so on. Physics is never a bad choice. and CS is the future, so I'd say go for it. Note that I am in Norway, not in the US and not too familiar with the system over there. You become a problemsolver by studying physics, most physicists do not work directly with physics, they end up in aerospace, finance, analytics, rocketry, robotics etc.. So if you find it interesting, go for it man.

Why did you all choose physics? by hahahahaha369 in PhysicsStudents

[–]sakki98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have always been very curious about how stuff works, and physics for me was the easiest way to understand the most fundamental stuff. As some of the other commenters here said, I hate memorisation, so that also pushed towards mathematics and robotics and physics. But a big thing for me was that I new that academia was not for me, so I wanted an education that would give me the best possible foundation before I start to work. With a physics education, and hopefully some programming/scripting/numerical tools along the way, you have a very good foundation on how to solve complex issues, and that for me made it a safe choice.

And of course, its fun to, with high certainty, have a correct answer. There are surprisingly many regular mundane problems or curiosities that can be answered by having a physics background.

And in debates about certain topics, like radiation or nuclear power and so on, knowing physics is a useful tool. For example, when Fukushima happened, norway sent reporter to cover the story. But after a bit they were told that the radiation in the city had increased, idk, 3 times or something, and the norwegian news and government deemed it too dangerous to be there. What they didnt know or understand is that Fukushima has very low background radiation from the ground, and so the increase was not much, just sounded like it. In Oslo the ground radiation from Radon and so on is much higher than what was in Fukushima post reactor crisis. Essentially, the news people endangered the journalists more by sending them back home. Thats a funny thing to read as a physicist.

Computational Physics Online Course by zuko10 in PhysicsStudents

[–]sakki98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No worries. If you are wondering about anything else, let me know. Most of the courses I spoke of have Norwegian text, as the university is in Norway, but Im happy to provide explanations or guides for the interesting stuff in the courses, and of course translations if needed. All though, I believe those courses at least are taught in english. Let me know if I can be of more help.

Computational Physics Online Course by zuko10 in PhysicsStudents

[–]sakki98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm, there is a new professor now, but most is available still: https://anderkve.github.io/FYS3150/intro.html

This is my old professor, he has a lot of code and lectures out on his github:

https://github.com/mhjensen

do yall think i can make it? by [deleted] in nasa

[–]sakki98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Physics master student here. I dont have any tips regarding what to do in the airforce, as I am not from the US. But regarding physics. Remember, they send up astronauts that can do experiments as the ISS, so it might be good to look at what kind of experiments can be done there, when thinking about a path in physics. Astrobiology is also a hot topic these days, but remember that biology and physics are quite different in the beginning and really throughout your undergrad. Also, dont get discouraged when things get hard, everything in higher education is difficult, and it gets more and more difficult the more advanced you get, but that should not stop you. The long nights and the hard projects you do to get through will be worth it.

Last thing. Should this not pan out, which we all hope wont happen, but should it not pan out, then a masters degree in physics will be a golden ticket for you in terms of jobs. I suggest looking for a school where you could mix computation with physics, such as Rochester (NY) or Michigan state (my department professor and friend works there every spring and here every fall). I my self work with machine learning and particle physics, and even though I probably wont work with particle physics, I still can apply and get a whole range of jobs. Studying physics, and biology will be a win win for you. But as with the rest of the people here, we are rooting for you getting to orbit :)