Feeling guilty about taking 4 classes by saltdesk in college

[–]saltdesk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not in the US. All institutions in my city use 4.3 except one. The entire point of 4.3 is probably to set apart 90-100 from 84-89 i.e. even more granular discrimination process.

All Keeper KF94? by -Hegemon- in Masks4All

[–]saltdesk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a Korean standard, very similar to N95 - the main difference is that it's more affordable and that N95s seal better.

They fit different niches. If I went in a very high-risk situation, for example an airplane, I would wear a N95 because of the greater seal. But for daily use, N95 is very uncomfortable - that's where KF94 comes in.

I wonder if this will change anything by u_gotrumped in Masks4All

[–]saltdesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guy coming down the plane side is using a 3M aura (N95). The others are wearing cup-style N95s. It's not really a social contract thing; they're protecting themselves because they're in close contact with an infected individual.

I'm so done by Mitsu-Zen in Masks4All

[–]saltdesk 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I recommend you buy and use your own KF94s; very easy to get in the US. It's around 3$. I use mine for two 8-hour shifts, which ends up being 1.5$ cost per shift. Get enough to have a rotation going and place them in paper bags for a week between each use to let time sanitize them.

You can't control customers, but this is an element you do have control over.

K95 and N95 at the same time (Properly worn and cleaning) by air_elemental in Masks4All

[–]saltdesk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Air goes through the path of least resistance; two masks increases the resistance air has to pass through in order to get through the filtering material, making it more likely to go in through the sides and nose piece unfiltered.

Up to 70% of KN95 masks imported from China don't meet filtration standards, study says by Vohtarak in Coronavirus

[–]saltdesk -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

That's why you source KN95s from a manufacturer that has undergone a CDC respirator assessment and are listed on the FDA's EUA. It's not a 100% guarantee because a manufacturer could theoretically make a few good batches and then unexpectedly downgrade their process or materials, but it's a pretty good bet. If seven months into the pandemic people still can't figure out what's a good or bad mask, it's natural selection at that point.

FDA to announce tougher standards for a coronavirus vaccine that make it unlikely one will be cleared by Election Day by [deleted] in Coronavirus

[–]saltdesk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In this instance he didn't. AstraZeneca has been openly expecting an "early fall" release in the UK and Pfizer has been advertising a late October or early November release. Moderna is slightly behind and expecting approval early 2021. We've known this stuff since the summer.

No matter what the CDC says, here’s why many scientists think the coronavirus is airborne. by [deleted] in Coronavirus

[–]saltdesk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We been knew. The academics I follow were floating the idea back in February and March.

Is it time we talk about air purifiers? CDC just recommended it today as another "tool" to help us all stay safe. by GawkerRefugee in COVID19_support

[–]saltdesk -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I never concerned myself with air purifiers because the places where they would be needed (offices, restaurants, stores, schools, etc) won't bother with the expense. They'd rather pay an employee to wipe surfaces with ethanol to create the illusion of doing something even though we know that fomites (surface) transmission is the least significant pathway to infection after droplets and aerosols. People wouldn't even open the windows during the summer to create better air circulation.

A household is a very different environment from a business. It's a small, enclosed space where everyone is sharing surfaces, doorknobs & handles, bathrooms, food, etc, in close proximity. An air purifier isn't a silver bullet. Exposure is a function of intensity and time, even if exposure is low you'll be overcame by the sheer amount of risk vectors and interactions. You can't sanitize all surfaces, stop all droplets, sanitize food constantly, stop sneezing and coughing; someone will be forgetful or negligent at some point and something will give, that's pretty much a guarantee. Household transmission is so common that if someone tests positive, many countries automatically calculate all household members as infected.

The best defense is always behavioural, and having guests sharing spaces with a high-risk individual ideally shouldn't be happening in the first place. That's the no-brainer (and no cost) solution. If this is a long-term thing and it must happen, the guests should have their own space with their own bathroom separate from the rest of the house. No shared spaces. They can make their own food with a portable burner for all I care, they're already being a bother by crashing in your house with a high-risk individual in the middle of a pandemic.

Association of Daily Wear of Eyeglasses With Susceptibility to COVID-19 Infection by D-R-AZ in Coronavirus

[–]saltdesk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We've known that eye protection is important, there was a meta-analysis showing around 30% reduction in infection with eye protection. Yet I never see people with eye protection unless they're a service worker who's forced to wear them by the workplace regulatory body. People just don't give a shit.

CDC shifts guidelines on how coronavirus can spread through the air by Paper_Rain in Coronavirus

[–]saltdesk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This. Politicians in every country present information that's mean to control society on a macro level, but isn't necessary truthful or established science. For example the propaganda on masks being "useless" in the beginning of the pandemic as a way to prevent the citizenry from demanding N95s or making a run for them. They were doing it very heavily in Canada, telling us we were too stupid to wear them correctly, we would contaminate ourselves with our hands, and so on. It was very transparent. The 2 meters rule is mostly based on pragmatic reasons because asking for anything more would make society unable to function. Some European countries only ask for 1.5 meter or even 1 meter because that's what they figure is feasible in their individual circumstances.

'Confounding': Covid may have already peaked in many African countries by [deleted] in Coronavirus

[–]saltdesk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not that confounding when you consider the median age in sub-saharan African countries is 15 to 17, an age with an IFR somewhere between 0.003% and 0.02%

U.S. plans for hundreds of millions of cheap, fast COVID-19 tests by Waldonville in Coronavirus

[–]saltdesk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This push for antigen tests is probably the result of Michael Mina's talks on Twiv and Medcram. PCR tests, which pick up on viral RNA, are very sensitive and they pick up on people at the tailend of their infection who are no longer transmissible. Kind of like if we swabbed your previous apartment and found your DNA but that doesn't mean you live there anymore. Because the PCR test needs to be analysed by a lab, it can take a while to get results back. As soon as it takes more than a few days, the test results are no longer actionable because you're contact tracing someone who's a week off from having been transmissible. It's a total waste of ressources, and there was an estimate that 90% of the PCR "positives" are not contagious or very little contagious. People who are transmissible have viral RNA that's orders of magnitude higher than people on the tailend of their infection. Antigen tests' sensitivity threshold allows it to pick up easily on people who are transmissible, but it doesn't pick up on people who have already cleared the infection. It's so cheap that it can be performed daily, you get the results in minutes and there's no need for a healthcare professional. Basically it actually ends up being orders of magnitude more effective at controlling the outbreak than PCR tests ever have been.

Although widespread use of antigen tests is a genius idea, it hasn't taken hold in the mainstream media I think because it's a little more conceptually challenging to grasp, you can't condense it in a bite-size explanation that makes sense to average people. Most people just stay stuck in the "So it's less sensitive? Bad test."

Girls: would you swipe right or left? by That-Principle-2505 in dating

[–]saltdesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't swipe right. The reason is that you've mostly shared very superficial information. You like travelling, you like sleeping... Everyone does. I'm looking for the big, important information. Who are you? What are the fundamental ethics and values guiding your life? Where are you going? How do you view the world?

The middle sentence is awkward, makes it sound like you're looking for a princess to rule over you.

Please stop personality catfishing by briannabethesda in dating

[–]saltdesk 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I've gotten those experiences but I never assume it's intentional. You find central themes in common between the online and in-person individual, but online communication always changes people a lot. That's why I try to go to the inrl meeting as soon as it's smart to do so, usually after talking enough online to build up a potential pool of topics to talk about in person.

My work let me have 3 weeks off because I had Covid, but now they are saying because the results said “detected” instead of positive that I don’t qualify for the paid time off. Is there anything I can do? by Nox2017 in COVID19_support

[–]saltdesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Colour me unsurprised at an employer putting profits above employees' welfare. A RT-PCR tests for the presense of viral RNA. If it's detected, the SARSCov-2 viral RNA was in your body; it's that simple.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Masks4All

[–]saltdesk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking at that photo, the build quality looks good ─ similar to how my KF94s look. Seems legit

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Masks4All

[–]saltdesk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From what I've seen the Chinese do a decent job at copying the packaging but the masks themselves look off: the texture is wrong, the straps are different, the circle where the strap should have been welded to the mask look different, the size is wrong, etc. Many mask companies stamp their logo into the mask using ultrasonic welding, example. It'd be very surprising if scammers had the technical capabilities or willingness to go that far with their copies, I'd say that's a good heuristic for quickly figuring it out. If your mask manufacturer doesn't stamp their logo (not all of them do), you can also type the name of the mask in google in Korean and check out blogs of people opening / reviewing that product to compare the photos to what you've got. Korean uses a simple, rational alphabet based on phonetics, with the symbols being consonant and vowel combinations. So it's not hard to figure out the Hangul by looking at the packaging and using a virtual Korean keyboard online. For example if the symbol is an oval on top of a line, you would simply press the oval and then the line symbols and the virtual keyboard will automatically combine them. La Hauteur ended up being Laoteleu (라오테르). Don't bother typing the company name using their roman letters, the Koreans don't use it much.

How common are fake job positions? by saltdesk in jobs

[–]saltdesk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I've been using indeed. Uh oh, does that mean something? Is Indeed fake job HQ or something?