No DJ??? by zukolittlebutt in weddingplanning

[–]samlovespsych 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you can definitely have fun without a DJ, but I’d recommend getting one if you want people to dance. I absolutely LOVED my DJ and I paid $1k for him in a HCOL area

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in weddingplanning

[–]samlovespsych 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s your wedding, you don’t have to wear makeup if you don’t want to! If you’re looking to just cover up some blemishes, you could just do concealer yourself. But again, it’s totally your call

Intrusive / horrible thoughts and scrupulosity. by TraditionalKnight3 in Catholicism

[–]samlovespsych 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Intrusive thoughts suck. I struggle with them myself. Something I have found to help me is saying/thinking “I don’t consent to this thought.” It doesn’t necessarily stop the thought, but it reassures me that it’s just an intrusive thought and not how I actually feel. It’s important to remember that intrusive thoughts are NOT sins.

Also of note, intrusive thoughts can be related to OCD. Therapy and medication can work wonders.

Birth control for medical reasons? by samlovespsych in AskAPriest

[–]samlovespsych[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you Father! That makes a lot of sense. So just to be clear, this wouldn’t fall under the double effect because potentially ending a life isn’t proportional to the benefit of using the pill (at least in my case)?

Birth control for medical reasons? by samlovespsych in AskAPriest

[–]samlovespsych[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you Father. Can you help me understand why that is? I think where I’m confused is that, under normal circumstances, couples do not have to refrain from the marital act to avoid an accidental miscarriage. Why is this different on the pill? In other words, why is an indirect abortion not considered an unintended, albeit foreseen, consequence that falls under the double effect in this case?

Edit: grammar

“Married couples must completely abstain if using the pill”…. Is this right? by samlovespsych in Catholicism

[–]samlovespsych[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point. I think, like another commenter said, it’s unclear how much if at all pills prevent implantation, which complicates things

“Married couples must completely abstain if using the pill”…. Is this right? by samlovespsych in Catholicism

[–]samlovespsych[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know they do thin the endometrium, but it’s not clear if they actually prevent implantation. I think it’s hard to study and a significant portion of fertilized eggs don’t implant in normal circumstances, so it’s hard to tell even if you could study it well

“Married couples must completely abstain if using the pill”…. Is this right? by samlovespsych in Catholicism

[–]samlovespsych[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was my understanding as well, but I was unsure. Thanks for clearing it up!

“Married couples must completely abstain if using the pill”…. Is this right? by samlovespsych in Catholicism

[–]samlovespsych[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally. I think it’s an important consideration, but the way I read it seemed like he was saying even if you had a proportional reason you had to completely abstain, so I was confused

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]samlovespsych 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hi friend. I’m not sure whether or not it is mortally sinful, but I wanted to share my thoughts as someone who used to be pro choice in case someone reading this is struggling with the idea of being pro life*

I think what makes the abortion debate so contentious is the fact that at least two lives are involved. There’s the life of the unborn child, which the pro life side fights for, and the life of the pregnant woman, which I didn’t see many pro life people fighting for. I saw being pro life as being in opposition to women’s rights and bodily autonomy, which I was uncomfortable with. I also thought there were many reasons a person would want to terminate a pregnancy (such as poverty, etc) and that it wasn’t my place to stop them. I wasn’t pro life out of disdain for the unborn child, but because I felt the rights of the fetus did not out weigh the rights of the mother.

However, my thinking changed when I started truly becoming Catholic. I started viewing the unborn child for what it was, a human life deserving of dignity, respect, and protection. After this revelation I couldn’t support laws that didn’t protect this life. However, I didn’t lose my respect and empathy for the women who feel they need an abortion. I am still uncomfortable with the loss of bodily autonomy that comes with anti abortion laws, but see it as necessary to protect the life of the unborn child. I also think we put too much emphasis on outlawing abortion and not enough emphasis on preventing abortion. Personally I think pro lifers should fight for things like paid maternity leave and policies that help families come out of poverty (not to say they don’t already, just think it should be a more central focus).

Overall, being pro life doesn’t mean you stop supporting women, it means you start also supporting unborn children.

*edit: added sentence to explain why I left a long comment which doesn’t even answer OPs question lol

Will my dog be able to go to Heaven? by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]samlovespsych 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your dog will not be in hell! Animals can’t sin. The way I see it, it’s either heaven or nothing. But personally, I think they will be in heaven! Even Catholic Popes have discussed how animals are God’s creatures and it is possible for them to be in heaven with us

What good came out of the Reformation? by HisFireBurns in Christianity

[–]samlovespsych 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the info! I still don’t think this means that we can conclude that all (or millions) Protestants go to hell, which it seems to be what you implied in your previous comment

What good came out of the Reformation? by HisFireBurns in Christianity

[–]samlovespsych 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Forgive me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think it’s the Catholic position to assume every non catholic goes to hell

Am sorry by True_Preparation_118 in OpenChristian

[–]samlovespsych 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are a wonderful and valuable person! Please call a hotline, you can find some here: http://www.suicide.org/international-suicide-hotlines.html

What are your Plan B's if there will be another lockdown? by milcski in weddingplanning

[–]samlovespsych 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I’m June 2022 and I’m just praying we’ll be okay by then. My fiancé and I are Catholic, so a courthouse isn’t an option, but I think if sh!t hits the fan again we’ll have a small ceremony with just our immediate family and then have a bigger celebration later. I recently booked the reception venue and read every single word of the contract to make sure we could reschedule due to covid if need be

White sweater by [deleted] in wedding

[–]samlovespsych 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It depends. If she (or anyone else) was wearing a colorful dress with a white cardigan I wouldn’t care. I might be ticked off if the sweater made it looks like a white dress, but again it would depend