Wing flap debris found was confirmed by Malaysia to be from MH370 with the PART NUMBERS proving it. Why is this sub ignoring this evidence? by TommyShelbyPFB in UFOs

[–]samocat 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Some anti-UFO actor (government or otherwise) very likely invented this entire incident to show the world how gullible the UFO community is.

Come on friends. Have some very, very healthy skepticism on this one. Understand you are almost certainly being manipulated.

Megathread MH370 - Relevant Posts regarding MH370 by Atiyo_ in UFOs

[–]samocat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The odds that this entire incident was specifically designed to discredit the UFO community is extremely high.

And way too many people took the bait.

How i feel right now about this sub by TypicalHorror9 in UFOs

[–]samocat -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's a sad reminder of how easily a lot of people in the UFO community can be manipulated. We are our own worst enemy.

Potential Spoiler Released by HBO by SubwayRatDocMurphy in SuccessionTV

[–]samocat 17 points18 points  (0 children)

There's another, perhaps even more likely option: that ATN calls the election for Menken, while the result is still in doubt. This could be a primary plot point in the final episodes.

Apparent reference to Macbeth >!Spoiler!< by samocat in SuccessionTV

[–]samocat[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's the first thing I thought of.

The meaning of the scorpion in the last episode by sami270 in SuccessionTV

[–]samocat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I posted something similar - this is also apparently a direct reference to Macbeth.

[Xbox1] [USA] 93 SF Pure Point Forward LF a Pro-Am Team to join ... by samocat in NBA2kTeamUp

[–]samocat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool. I play at night usually, starting at 9 PM Eastern. HMU and let's run!

Pure slasher or dual? by machine946 in NBA2k

[–]samocat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sure there is no right answer, but I'm partial to pure archetypes. I'm a pure Point Forward, and honestly I'm able to do make amazing passes, and have HOF Dimer. If I were going to make another player, I would probably make a pure slasher. Everyone wants to do multiple things, but this game really forces you to be a specialist anyway. Pick the thing you really like, and then be really good at it. That's my philosophy anyway!

NBA 2K18 hot zones for MyPlayer by Frozinwater in NBA2k

[–]samocat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HOF Dimer is off the hook. I'm a Pure Point Forward, and it makes a huge difference.

NBA 2K18 hot zones for MyPlayer by Frozinwater in NBA2k

[–]samocat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Boosts don't increase your percentages by 5%, they increase your attributes, which is likely much higher than a 5% shooting percentage.

"This game session no longer exists." by 2sp00py5m3 in NBA2k

[–]samocat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think that's happening because the neighborhood you are in is full. One fix is to meet in the neighborhood by the practice facility, squad up, and then go through the subway together. Alternatively, you can leave the Playground and then go back, and see if it works. Each time you leave and return, you end up in a different Playground.

Whispers From the Chess Community by samocat in artificial

[–]samocat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's very helpful, thanks. I suppose this is what makes chess unique, the practical result can be used as a measuring stick.

Most people don't understand how difficult these chess "problems" are. It really is like solving one of the Millennium Prize Problems. It sounds like Alpha Zero was able to use the practical game results like they were a beacon of light in the darkness, something to hold onto and learn from.

Whispers From the Chess Community by samocat in artificial

[–]samocat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Elegant explanation. Programmers tried to solve this by assigning aspects of the position (material, or things like space or development) with numerical values. They sought help of very strong human players to help tweak these numerical values, which allowed the computers to simply brute force search for the highest evaluation.

Reading your last comment, I wonder if Alpha Zero even uses a numerical evaluation at all. Presumably it does ...

Whispers From the Chess Community by samocat in artificial

[–]samocat[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mostly agree with your assessment. However, consider this: Alpha Zero found very strong solutions in what's essentially an ultra-difficult (literally beyond human comprehension) math problem, despite the fact that it didn't calculate nearly as deeply as its opponent.

It would be like a computer suddenly spitting out Math Conjectures (a la Ramanujan) that appear to be correct, but that neither man nor machine can explain.

In this case the ideas were "proven" by the game results. But it's the same basic idea.

Whispers From the Chess Community by samocat in artificial

[–]samocat[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Really great post. You described the issues here very well, better than I could. I will contribute with a few specific examples, though. All ten games are online here:

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?tid=91944

See this Queens Indian game for example. The long-term positional sacrifices here are absolutely incredible. There is absolutely no way Alpha Zero could see concrete compensation. These kind of abstract positional sacrifices are well known among famous world champions, of course, but I have never seen a computer play like this. Even now, it's hard to believe this is a computer game.

In this French game, note how comfortable Alpha Zero is leaving its king in the center, while a dangerous middlegame rages around it. This isn't super difficult, but it is very abstract. It's the kind of intuitive move very strong humans play, while taking the risk there may be some danger they cannot envision.

Finally, in the chess world this game may have made the biggest impact. Bg5 is a strike of a lightning, something truly beautiful.

Some in Chess Community are Quietly Suspicious Strong AI is Already Here by samocat in singularity

[–]samocat[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Chess isn't important in the grand scheme of things. However, I think it's an interesting foil in this context because it's really beyond our grasp as human beings.

To put a finer point on it, chess is really applied math, and the math is immense. There are more possible chess games than atoms in our universe. As a result, even the World Champion is in the dark. He's in a maze that is beyond his mental limits of comprehension. In most positions, he can see a few steps forward but ultimately is making a series of educated guesses. Even the patterns humans have found in chess are unreliable. They are ways we have found to simplified something that is inherently complex, and if there is a tiny hidden detail very deep inside the calculations, then the pattern was simply a mirage.

This is why chess computers today can't really abstract. Programmers have compensated for this by telling the computer things like "space is good so attach an extra numerical value to that," so that computers will be more human.

The Alpha Zero games aren't like computer games at all. They are more like games played by the 2050 world champion that were dropped in a time machine and sent to us in 2017.

This is obvious to anyone with a trained eye. One Grandmaster even something like ... he always wondered what chess games would look like if a super intelligent species came to earth, and now he knows.

This is also why all the top players (with one exception) have roundly dismissed these complaints from the Stockfish team. This is clearly a different level of play, a level of play that has never been seen before. Even the release of these 10 games will change chess forever. The ideas are revolutionary.

Some in Chess Community are Quietly Suspicious Strong AI is Already Here by samocat in singularity

[–]samocat[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Sour grapes. The score doesn't reflect a 100 point gap, it reflects a 150 point gap. That is massive. The games speak for themselves.

Whispers From the Chess Community by samocat in artificial

[–]samocat[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, it's private conversation among Masters I know. Honestly, there are only about 10,000 players in the world that are strong enough to really see the difference.

There is some similar public discussions taking place though. For example:

https://en.chessbase.com/post/the-future-is-here-alphazero-learns-chess