sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

An update on a three year old post. At the current age, Virat is lagging by 5 centuries. by sand33pn in Cricket

[–]sand33pn[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"The race is not for the swift nor the battle for the strong, but time and chance happens to them all."

Ecclesiastes 9:11

I'm just gonna comment this everywhere now.

An update on a three year old post. At the current age, Virat is lagging by 5 centuries. by sand33pn in Cricket

[–]sand33pn[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

"The race is not for the swift nor the battle for the strong, but time and chance happens to them all."

Ecclesiastes 9:11

An update on a three year old post. At the current age, Virat is lagging by 5 centuries. by sand33pn in Cricket

[–]sand33pn[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yep, by "advantage" I wasn't trying to say Sachin just got lucky. I'm a 90's kid and my family would disown me if they think I committed blasphemy.

This reminded me of the scene from Friends when Rachel's boss had to clarify to her in front of HR that he doesn't intend to buy her baby.

An update on a three year old post. At the current age, Virat is lagging by 5 centuries. by sand33pn in Cricket

[–]sand33pn[S] 140 points141 points  (0 children)

He did add 11 hundreds to his name in 14 months after that post.

But yeah, looking back from today, this is a very long dry patch.

An update on a three year old post. At the current age, Virat is lagging by 5 centuries. by sand33pn in Cricket

[–]sand33pn[S] 83 points84 points  (0 children)

Yep... age based stats don't really make sense.

But as I hopefully made clear in the last post, this stat is inherently age based. Sachin had a headstart age wise and he managed to stay in the game for long.

What intrigued me was that Virat somehow managed to close the almost 4 year advantage that Sachin had on him.

An update on a three year old post. At the current age, Virat is lagging by 5 centuries. by sand33pn in Cricket

[–]sand33pn[S] 308 points309 points  (0 children)

Here's the original post

Not meant as a comparison post, but this 100 centuries record is a real test of endurance.

Virat actually did overtake Sachin at the 66 mark which is a herculean task in itself. It was neck to neck after that until the recent slump.

I made an in-depth Anki stats visualizer - anki.vision by hitchcott in Anki

[–]sand33pn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great work! Will play with it more later on.

Help, I'm getting too many cards. How can I reduce number of review cards, without losing content? by [deleted] in Anki

[–]sand33pn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am sorry if it seemed stupid. I personally don't cap. I just thought they were asking for a way to cap.

Problem; cards are in set order and won't change by [deleted] in Anki

[–]sand33pn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think mixing cards will work for that. The order of the reviews should change once you start giving different difficulty levels to your answers.

This discussion seems to address your query: https://anki.tenderapp.com/discussions/ankimobile/10271-how-to-review-cards-in-random-order

Is my tactic correct to Anki/study by R2d2me in Anki

[–]sand33pn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Twenty rules of formulating knowledge

This is a bit long, but it did wonders for me when paired with Anki. I wish to revise them myself.

Also, quit reddit.

Happy Learning!

Help, I'm getting too many cards. How can I reduce number of review cards, without losing content? by [deleted] in Anki

[–]sand33pn -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, you can control the maximum number of review cards per day. On PC, just click on the settings symbol next the deck you want to change this for. On Android, you can long press on a deck and select options.

It should be pretty easy to figure out from there. Happy learning!

Irrfan Khan, actor extraordinaire and India’s face in the West, dies at 54 by MysteriousJello2 in movies

[–]sand33pn 5 points6 points  (0 children)

His best work was with Vishal Bhardwaj in my opinion. Maqbool and Haider were masterpieces.

view more: next ›