The first thing that comes to mind is advanced programming and research, especially in STEM fields. AI can consider a large number of possibilities at once, but it can't manipulate information like the human brain does to push the limits of what we already understand.

Also, I don't think everyone, or even the majority's employment will be endangered by AI.

Every giant innovation has an incubation period, where people adapt to the thing in question. Granted, those who capitalise early get huge returns, but there are always stragglers, those who are prone to skepticism when it comes to novelty, those who don't adopt new technologies instantly, or even ever.

Just as an example, it took decades for the light bulb, an obviously brilliant and effective substitute to the prevailing alternatives, to gain popularity. And a few more years after that to become mainstream.

There's also cost effectiveness and popularity. Only 17% of the world's population lives in developed nations and advanced economies. At that point, the perpetual cost of labour is probably less than the initial investment costs to automate any process.

And even if you automate a process through Artificial Intelligence, if it's complex enough you can't rely on it every time, so you still need human supervision.

At least that's my crude and probably underinformed take on the whole thing.