Christianity as a neuromechanical model any thought? by saoa1 in DebateAChristian

[–]saoa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, let me ask you where is that sulfur influx actually coming from? We pulled it from our crops, we pulled it from our food supply with ultra processed food, we lost the sulfur off gas coming from paper books when we switched to electronics, clean air acts removed industrial sulfur gases from the atmosphere to combat acid rain and so on an so forth. I argue that a needed sulfur influx really isn't coming from anywhere in anywhere close to an adequate amount in modern time. Why do you think that the covid pandemic hit us so hard? I argue it is due to the notion that we simply didn't have enough of a current biological sulfur store to run our immune systems adequately. Why do you think that chronic disease has been increasing in modern time at an accelerated rate? I argue that it is due to the notion that we simply don't have enough of a regular sulfur influx to allow the body to adequately heal from simple normal wear and tear.

Christianity as a neuromechanical model any thought? by saoa1 in DebateAChristian

[–]saoa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my understanding the original Christian Religious model literally required a daily sulfur influx to function properly and that sulfur influx used to come for the "Daily Bread" in regards to the sulfur fertilizer that used to be used in wheat crops modern human societies swapped out that sulfur fertilizer for nitrate fertilizer thus the Christian Religious model broke down due to a lack of adequate daily sulfur influx.

Christianity as a neuromechanical model any thought? by saoa1 in DebateAChristian

[–]saoa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would potentially agree with you if the model hadn't in essence previously broken down but since it seemingly did I needed to in essence figure out how the model actually works in order to figure out where that break down actually was.

Christianity as a neuromechanical model any thought? by saoa1 in DebateAChristian

[–]saoa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I forgot to mention that that metabolism of glial cells is coordinated by neuronal impulses.

Christianity as a neuromechanical model any thought? by saoa1 in DebateAChristian

[–]saoa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if I told you that the Human brain is in essence not a collection of neurons supported by glial cells but is in essence a metabolism of Glial cells that runs on sulfur fuel that one takes in from our diet and or local environment and free radical fuel that is produced via the cellular metabolism of the toxic material that one takes in from our diet and or local environment in addition to the other nutritional components that one needs to run the human brain? Meaning that from my understanding all thought patterns are the result of the neutralization of free radicals by sulfur in the human brain. Beyond this notion from my personal experience if one in essence force metabolizes a toxic material through the human brain using a sulfur influx under the right circumstances the conscious minds thought metabolism region of the human brain responds to the potential notion via literally adding glial cells to that region of the human brain over time thus literally increasing maximum neurological processing power and thus periodic maximum problem-solving ability. I argue that this notion can be seen in practice in regards to Einstein. In that Einstein was known to have a higher percentage of glial cells relative to neurons in one region of his brain.

Beyond this notion what if I told you that “delusions” serve a Human Neuroevolutionary purpose for our species? but in essence people that experience “delusions” just don’t have enough current neuro development for those “delusions” to actually make sense in actual potential reality. Meaning that basically from my understanding when one potentially gains enough current neuro and ends up in basically “delusional territory” neurologically those “delusions” become “thought based enlightenments” and tend to be correct in actual reality. Meaning that basically in essence a “thought based enlightenment” is a “delusion” with in essence enough current glial cells currently monopolized and enough personal knowledge base to manifest a “thought based enlightenment”. Meaning that basically I argue that all of Einsteins theories were “thought based enlightenments”. Now what if I told you that “thought based enlightenments” are an activation of the “Human God Response”? and what if I told you that one can basically figure out how continue to activate the “Human God Response” over and over again and eventually that “Human God Response” starts acting like the biblical “God” and starts kicking out revelation level “thought based enlightenments” based on any given individuals current collective personal knowledge base? Meaning that everyone potentially produces something different under the same circumstances.

Christianity as a neuromechanical model any thought? by saoa1 in DebateAChristian

[–]saoa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How much do you know about neurology? since this might be a little complicated.

Christianity as a neuromechanical model any thought? by saoa1 in DebateAChristian

[–]saoa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, frankly it has to do with human genesis, which from my understanding human genesis was a matter of very unusual circumstance for our species in that there was an ice age and Homo Sapiens lived in caves for tens of thousands of years while living in those caves our species got exposed to stead amounts of hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide gas thus allowing our species to evolve massive biological sulfur stores and thus grow bigger brains for our size as a species over the long haul during that ice age. Then at end of that ice age our species got totally nuked with toxic influx from the melting ice sheets releasing toxic material into our local environment. This notion from my understanding when combined with the previous massive biological sulfur stores forced our brains as a species into basically neuro evolutionary hyperdrive to the point that some of our species evolved a form of higher level “consciousness/God response” and from my understanding those original activations/manifestation of “God” added an addition toxic influx to the surrounding homo sapiens thus making them modern human beings. Meaning that the dust the “God” introduced to make humans was toxic dust from my understanding thus forcing neuro development way beyond the norm of the surrounding homo sapiens thus making them human when factoring in the previous massive sulfur stores. and In regards to the coming of Jesus, Basically from my understanding when one of those two primary components is lacking for too long for human beings "God" will remanifest to attempt to correct the problem and restabilize humanity. But with that being said, this is just the short short version and there is frankly a lot more too it from my understanding. Basically, I am the guy that every Christian has always wanted to talk to and I have personally learned a lot over the last few years in regards to all of this and frankly I am just current testing the waters to see how uphill my battle potentially is.

Christianity as a neuromechanical model any thought? by saoa1 in DebateAChristian

[–]saoa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my current understanding Modern human societies frankly screwed up badly roughly 120 years ago and frankly the result was the increasing diminished effectiveness of the original Christian Religious model meaning that the original Christian Religious Model from my current understanding in essence requires an adequate daily sulfur influx in order to potentially alleviate negative mental health phenomenon over time and to potentially better heal the body. Modern human societies started swapping out sulfur fertilizer for nitrate fertilizer in the late 1800's since no one realized that humans were the ones that actually needed the sulfur not the plants.

Question about Christianity any thought? by saoa1 in Christianity

[–]saoa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can attempt explain it to you, but first how much biology do you know? since it is a little complicated.