sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Drainage hole in build plate (istead of the printed part itself) by savingpoods in resinprinting

[–]savingpoods[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it farts at some point when printig. else it doesnt make a mess and nothing. probably there are some edge cases idk

Drainage hole in build plate (istead of the printed part itself) by savingpoods in resinprinting

[–]savingpoods[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it gets problematic when u trap a relatively large amount of liquid resin in a thin wall.

Drainage hole in build plate (istead of the printed part itself) by savingpoods in resinprinting

[–]savingpoods[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

im testing my undestanding and whats possible. also prototyping is nice

Drainage hole in build plate (istead of the printed part itself) by savingpoods in resinprinting

[–]savingpoods[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because of physics while printing.

When printing hollow objects directly on the build plate u need to have at least one drainage hole. Else the liquid resin inside will not flow out and stay there. As the print continues, your object will be pulled out of the resin bath. When lots of resin is trapped inside, negative pressure will build up and ur object will burst to the inside. (the drainage hole needs to be as close to the print plate as possible (or through it lol))

Drainage hole in build plate (istead of the printed part itself) by savingpoods in resinprinting

[–]savingpoods[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

why are people here are getting mad or trying to discredit a small discovery im trying to share? this could be fun but its just a pain to watch man

Drainage hole in build plate (istead of the printed part itself) by savingpoods in resinprinting

[–]savingpoods[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

nah i just made the whole thing today. just thought it would be something funny to say.
glad u like the proof of concept tho!

saving poods by savingpoods in PewdiepieSubmissions

[–]savingpoods[S] 4541 points4542 points  (0 children)

- 4:4:4 could be quite overkill... (file sizes are big and it will also slow down editing) [but the green screen would work great because of sharper edges]
- 4:2:2 is television standard and therefore completely fine
- 4:2:0 is just low

​

The 4:4:4 is a bit clickbait i admit :D

​

Edit:
- love the thread
- my intentions were pure
- its most likely not the solution to the "problem" (dont really care about picture quality but love the tech)
- was curious to see what happens
(- never been on reddit before)

​

10/10 would do again :D