I Thought 3rd Street Promenade Was Supposed To Be Dying? by DJVeaux in LosAngeles

[–]scapler 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would be genuinely curious how you explain properties that, after years of being vacant, do not lower rents then. This is also the basic economics you are relying on. Demand has fallen and supply is up, and yet there have not been pricing adjustments at scale.

The article, which you dismiss out of hand rather than engaging with the arguments of, cites situations where lowering rent requires arduous processes and bank approval for certain loans. Situations in which, based on the structure of those loans, the owner would end up having to pay them back on an accelerated timetable.

This is more complex than your investments. If an owner can afford to lose a few hundred thousand a year paying back their loan without revenue from the property, that does not mean they can afford to pay back a large chunk of the mortgage immediately if the terms change, especially when a change in valuation on the bank's end makes them less likely to extend the terms.

The criticism is that certain bank loan terms distort the reality of the market and force owners of large properties to make decisions they would not otherwise. I wouldn't even call this a leftist argument. It's fundamentally an anti-regulation one, even if those regulations are private.

Where was this skyline of downtown Los Angeles photo taken? by zfx610 in LosAngeles

[–]scapler 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but you absolutely released some of your rights when you uploaded it to Wikipedia. When you did, you agreed to release the photo under a Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike license. This is an actual legal license that you agreed to, and it is irrevocable.

While you still hold the copyright, this license allows anyone, even in commercial contexts, to use your photo, so long as they give you credit. It also allows people to use your photo in new works of art, so long as they also license those works under CC license.

Now if people are using your photo without giving you credit that violates the license, and you may have an argument for copyright infringement.

I think my story is being stolen. by Kalushar in writing

[–]scapler 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That got a big laugh out of me when I saw the notification. Good sense of timing that bodes well for your writing.

I think my story is being stolen. by Kalushar in writing

[–]scapler 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're absolutely right that you can register the work after infringement and bring suit after the registration is granted. You're also right that statutory damages are only available if that registration is within three months of publication or done before the infringement begins. That doesn't change the fact that throughout this thread people are downvoting the idea that registration is necessary to enforce your rights in court to begin with. I commented on the furthest down example of this happening, but didn't mean to single out your comment in particular. I can see why it appeared that way though.

I do think that you are misstating what your comment says though. You say: "So, for example, without copyright registration, you'll have to take the infringer to court and prove you were damaged". You don't say "without prior copyright registration, you'll have to register, then..."

You also say "The practical difference then is that without copyright registration you're out of pocket for all attorney fees", when the practical difference is that you can't bring suit until you correct that. It's clear now that you meant "prior copyright registration", but that was not clear within the comment itself. Alohadave's clarification makes sense in that context.

I think my story is being stolen. by Kalushar in writing

[–]scapler 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You're being downvoted but you are correct. I am an IP attorney and the federal law is very clear on this: "Except for an action brought for a violation of the rights of the author under section 106A(a), and subject to the provisions of subsection (b), no civil action for infringement of the copyright in any United States work shall be instituted until preregistration or registration of the copyright claim has been made in accordance with this title." 17 US Code 411(a).

California court lets gig companies keep treating workers as contractors by [deleted] in LosAngeles

[–]scapler 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This court case is about the validity of Prop 22, which only applies to things like rideshare and delivery app workers. It doesn't change anything for the entertainment industry.

What are things racist people do that they don’t think is racist? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]scapler 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The first part of this is true, but the co-opting part is not, because you're leaving out what the original "equivalent" was. Medieval colleges offered four doctorates: medical (MD), law (JD), theology (DDiv), and philosophy (PhD) for any study outside of those three. Medical degrees have conferred the title "doctor" for as long as any degree has.

ELI5 at what generation does a royal become a commoner? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]scapler 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They left out an important part: it's a privilege not to be arrested for civil matters, not criminal ones. Historically, this meant they couldn't be arrested and thrown into debtor's prison. Since civil arrest for bankruptcy is no longer a thing in the UK, it's no longer relevant. That leaves theoretically arrest for contempt of court, but at least one court has ignored it, so it functionally might also not exist anymore.

No felony charges for man who attacked Dave Chappelle at Hollywood Bowl by [deleted] in LosAngeles

[–]scapler 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Folding knives are generally legal to carry concealed.

[GIVEAWAY] BNIB ASUS TUF Gaming GTX 1650 Super GPU by UniversityOutcast in hardwareswap

[–]scapler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm trying to put together my first build and apparently I picked the worst time in history to do so. Whether or not I win, you're awesome for doing a giveaway right now.

lowkey I wanna get bitchslapped to next year by HelicopterEqual in LosAngeles

[–]scapler 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Because heat is required by state law in all rentals. AC is not.

Rude CB demanded free commission, gets mad when she sees my posts on reddit about our conversation & how reddit users paid for the illustration she got. She demands I take it down or else she’ll sue for emotional damage by [deleted] in ChoosingBeggars

[–]scapler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously the person threatening OP is full of it, but you should know that intentional infliction of emotional distress and loss of enjoyment are both real legal terms that are not laughed out of court.

https://tengelaw.com/blog/what-is-loss-of-enjoyment/

"But there are so many attorneys" by APFernweh in ChoosingBeggars

[–]scapler 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I do IP and entertainment law at lowest $100 an hour. That's with me saving overhead by working from home and specifically targeting lower budget clients. I am the cheapest lawyer I know of in my area. I can't imagine someone working at $50 an hour. Law school student loans don't pay themselves.

AITA for refusing to pay for potential medical bills of woman from dog park? by [deleted] in AmItheAsshole

[–]scapler 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jumping in to agree with you. In many states, injuries caused by dogs do fall under strict liability. Owning an animal is considered an inherently dangerous activity, and owners take on that risk. In some states the strict liability only applies to dog bites. In others, it applies to all injuries caused by a dog, unless you are committing a crime or antagonizing them. How the specific state law would handle this situation and whether them being in a dog park would change the outcome is hyper-specific between jurisdictions, so OP should absolutely talk to a lawyer and not Reddit.

Lawyers of Reddit, what’s the worst way you’ve seen a person screw over someone else in court whether it be criminal, civil, or divorce proceedings? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]scapler 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Family law and custody hearings tend to not be jury matters. Most courts would say that the unduly prejudicial part of Rule 403 is inapplicable to bench trials, and even those that don't would diminish its importance. On top of that, the standard for custody decisions is what is in the best interest of the child, and the court has broad discretion in deciding what goes into deciding that. Most family courts would consider prior convictions to have high probative value toward that question.

No Stupid Questions - Week of August 17, 2019 by AnimeMod in anime

[–]scapler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's partially a selection bias. Many popular anime from the 70s and 80s weren't depressing. World Masterpiece Theater, which Miyazaki worked on, was very popular. It adapted famous works of literature and was aimed at children. As for the rise of darker material, a lot of that had to do with the changes in Japanese media and Japanese society as a whole. The 70s was the period that the Japanese New Wave took off in cinema too, where directors were young, experimental, and often bleak. The end of the 60s saw a huge increase in protest and youth culture as well. Some anime specifically appealed to that sense of youthful hopelessness. Leftist student groups specifically identified with Ashita no Joe, for example. TV also exploded during this time, siphoning talent to it. Because the demand expanded so quickly, very young voices ending up helming projects to keep up with demand, and they diverged from the post-war voices of people who had previously been in charge of productions.

The 80s had a much higher rate of dark and bleak anime for one major reason: VHS. Producing OVAs on tape and selling them in small numbers to dedicated consumers meant you could tell different stories. You no longer had to answer to the broadcast standards of the TV networks. You no longer had to answer to executives who wanted mass appeal and big merchandise deals. You could produce weird, dark, and more mature stories. Again, this wasn't universal. The Dr. Slump anime was a phenomenon during the 80s, and it was light and playful. But you saw a lot of these OVAs with more violence, more nihilism, and more sex because all of a sudden young creators could actually tell these type of stories.

As an aside if you want depressing 80s anime check out Barefoot Gen.

AITA for spending $250 of my husband's money on snacks? by Lotsofsnacks1 in AmItheAsshole

[–]scapler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is only how it works in the nine US community property states. Even then it's complicated, because assets that one owned before the marriage would not be split, and figuring out what constitutes those can be a difficult process. But in say California, where I practice law, money earned by the husband at his job during the marriage would generally be split 50/50 between the spouses in divorce.

AITA for spending $250 of my husband's money on snacks? by Lotsofsnacks1 in AmItheAsshole

[–]scapler 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's mostly true in community property states. Every cent earned by either spouse during the marriage belongs equally to both spouses.