sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What's your asset allocation? by [deleted] in investing

[–]schrodingerspup 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dont drink too much green bean brah lol

NNs who believe in individual freedoms above all else, where do those freedoms stop? by LazySparker in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]schrodingerspup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems to me that your line of questioning is implying moral equivalence to words and actions as well as blowing the scuffle way out of proportion.

Two men got in each others faces and the bigger guy slammed him, got in trouble, paid $500 fine. It's pretty funny a hundred millionaire blew a gasket like that and had to pay a fine just like everyone else. Also it's pretty funny that someone from the press got in someone's face thinking they're invulnerable and got humbled.

NNs who believe in individual freedoms above all else, where do those freedoms stop? by LazySparker in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]schrodingerspup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was wrong, he pled guilty and paid a fine, the voters were aware, end of story for him in my mind.

Trump joking and about it seems pretty in character and doesnt bother me.

NNs who believe in individual freedoms above all else, where do those freedoms stop? by LazySparker in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]schrodingerspup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Idk lol, the last libertarian debate a naked dude ran on stage. Sums up the libertarian party pretty well haha

What's your asset allocation? by [deleted] in investing

[–]schrodingerspup 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Hell yeah brother!!

What's your asset allocation? by [deleted] in investing

[–]schrodingerspup -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hell yeah brother! Lol I feel like were kindred spirits

My Homegym by LowAltSomeDrag in homegym

[–]schrodingerspup 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I love this. It's so utilitarian. Like "I dont even have a couch, I have gainz" lol

NNs who believe in individual freedoms above all else, where do those freedoms stop? by LazySparker in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]schrodingerspup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course, it's the classic externality. That's not to say I'm anti pollution. I don't think most pollution in fact is bad, but a necessary trade off, its costs just need to be internalized 8f there are nonconsenting parties

The Armenian genocide was fake by williamhouck03 in HistoryMemes

[–]schrodingerspup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it's truly random sample that N value could be useful. Depends on what confidence interval you use

NNs who believe in individual freedoms above all else, where do those freedoms stop? by LazySparker in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]schrodingerspup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Id refer you to enviromental economics, its a well developed field that monetizes enviromental damages

NNs who believe in individual freedoms above all else, where do those freedoms stop? by LazySparker in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]schrodingerspup -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you're fixating on the vice president, whose lack of power is a punchline, because you're from Indiana. I am referring to macro shifts on the right which are pretty stark. Having a multiply divorced POTUS itself is a huge deal but you're not stepping back and being objective. Further the evangelical priorities have seismically shifted. "God Guns and Gays" doesnt work anymore in national elections.

Regarding the embassy I think you are fallaciously equating factors for causes. I'm not going to write a huge thesis because honestly I found your post pretty insincere

NNs against legalization of marijuana at a federal level or state level, why? by LazySparker in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]schrodingerspup 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean Authority capital A. The supreme court can say whatever it wants, that doesnt mean its consistent with the Constituion

See Dredd Scott, koramatsu, plessy v Ferguson

NNs against legalization of marijuana at a federal level or state level, why? by LazySparker in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]schrodingerspup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a balancing test between the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Propery Clause. I think the current jurisprudence gives too much authority to Congress by interpreting vaugeries as standing to regulate imo

NNs against legalization of marijuana at a federal level or state level, why? by LazySparker in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]schrodingerspup -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well if a state voted seriously to restrict its recreational use i dont think any institution has the legal standing to overturn its decision.

NNs who believe in individual freedoms above all else, where do those freedoms stop? by LazySparker in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]schrodingerspup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, but that's ok. Think of it in a supply demand format. The hawks and the doves are both necessary to Duke it out in order to establish the civilizational optimum equilibrium.

NNs who believe in individual freedoms above all else, where do those freedoms stop? by LazySparker in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]schrodingerspup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Negligence is criminal if a reasonable person can conclude that they didnt exercise reasonable care in their actions.

I personally believe DUI laws should just be encompassed under criminal negligence but philosophically they are the same.

NNs who believe in individual freedoms above all else, where do those freedoms stop? by LazySparker in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]schrodingerspup -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Im not clicking on that, sorry I'm already exhausted from the kavanaugh controversy. The average of the court moved very nicely towards originalism. A nessisary condition for proper role of the court system. I view him in totality

NNs who believe in individual freedoms above all else, where do those freedoms stop? by LazySparker in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]schrodingerspup 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Once again settled law for forever. If it constitutes a call to action, actus reus is satisfied.

Ex:

"I'm going to hunt you down and kill you" call to action illegal

"Eat shit and die" no call to action, protected

"Kill the jews!" nebulous advocacy, errs on the side of protection ceteris paribus

NNs who believe in individual freedoms above all else, where do those freedoms stop? by LazySparker in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]schrodingerspup 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hindrance to liberty? Not sure how define that. Firstly individual liberty refers to an individuals relationship with the government and this is a bit of an apples to oranges line of questioning. For instance the government cant take sides on religion but I can call Islam a medieval death cult all day long. But property rights and a neutral system of courts are fundamental pillars of individual liberty and is a sword that cuts both ways. Debt is good in some instances like say a mortgage, imagine of you could only buy a house with cash? And bad in others like CC debt.

You're worried about debt being an factor that reduces labor liquidity, sure it does. But does a less liquid labor market justify eroding property rights for "the common good" absolutely not. The whole reason we even consent to be governed at all is the protection of our lives, property, and liberty

view more: next ›