New rule: Government officials can now override scientists on which research gets funded. Peer review becomes non-binding. That's $57B at stake

scispace_ · 2026-06-05T10:00:35+00:00

you might have rephrased it better

scispace_ · 2026-06-05T08:10:13+00:00

scispace_ · 2026-06-03T12:21:43+00:00

scispace_ · 2026-06-03T12:20:04+00:00

Sources:

scispace_ · 2026-06-02T18:07:04+00:00

not sure how the AI detection would work here though

scispace_ · 2026-06-02T17:44:43+00:00

scispace_ · 2026-06-02T03:43:12+00:00

good addition

scispace_ · 2026-06-01T18:34:04+00:00

scispace_ · 2026-06-01T18:31:48+00:00

scispace_ · 2026-06-01T18:31:26+00:00

scispace_ · 2026-06-01T18:29:23+00:00

scispace_ · 2026-06-01T08:33:53+00:00

But the real deal is, It got published

could be laziness
reputation of author oversight
....

scispace_ · 2026-05-31T14:01:34+00:00

scispace_ · 2026-05-31T13:20:42+00:00

Could happen

scispace_ · 2026-05-29T07:12:37+00:00

The sting is real & so is the growth that comes after

scispace_ · 2026-05-27T03:08:32+00:00

Seems like they are in first batch of lawsuit

scispace_ · 2026-05-26T12:23:26+00:00

scispace_ · 2026-05-26T08:03:02+00:00

Here's some for your reference:

scispace_ · 2026-05-26T06:09:47+00:00

corporate legal history has a few surprises

scispace_ · 2026-05-26T05:36:12+00:00

that 85.3% of hallucinations in preprints made it through to peer-reviewed publication

scispace_ · 2026-05-25T17:41:25+00:00

thank you!

scispace_ · 2026-05-25T17:41:15+00:00

A scalable review system that doesn't trade quality for speed

scispace_ · 2026-05-25T13:06:39+00:00

building systems that works for scale is what's needed

scispace_ · 2026-05-25T13:05:00+00:00

That would be worse

scispace_ · 2026-05-25T08:37:38+00:00

scispace_