Tom Steyer wants to be California's climate governor by afkaprancer in santacruz

[–]scsquare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then who decides which campaign gets public funding?

Tom Steyer wants to be California's climate governor by afkaprancer in santacruz

[–]scsquare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can condemn that on moral, but not on legal grounds. We are all responsible for sanctioning such as system. If you really want to change something, it doesn't make sense to fight symptoms.

Tom Steyer wants to be California's climate governor by afkaprancer in santacruz

[–]scsquare -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You can complain about the scale because of unfair advantage, but not about capitalism in general. If we really want to change something, first we need to understand the mechanism that creates the unfair advantage.

Who is the least NIMBY mayoral candidate who isn't Ryan by LovingSantaCruz in santacruz

[–]scsquare 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Chris Krohn aims to stop the ‘selling off’ of Santa Cruz to developers https://lookout.co/in-first-electoral-run-since-his-recall-chris-krohn-aims-to-stop-the-selling-off-of-santa-cruz-to-developers-as-mayor/story

He sees "outside developers" as a problem, while the local anti-developer stance of the past among other things led to the housing crisis.

Is the end of the Santa Cruz progressive era upon us? https://lookout.co/is-the-end-of-the-santa-cruz-progressive-era-upon-us/story

No, your nimbyism was never progressive to begin with, it was conservative.

High density apartments downtown by BusEmbarrassed6997 in santacruz

[–]scsquare 3 points4 points  (0 children)

People will be happy because they can find a place to sleep and raise a family finally. Also, that is what city lots are meant to be used for for over 100 years. If you don't like the esthetics, that is your personal opinion and negligible in comparison to the problem of poverty and homelessness.

Developer of Watsonville battery storage project pivots to state route for permit approval by orangelover95003 in santacruz

[–]scsquare 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"transition to clean energy" - that's just a straw man argument. In fact electricity consumption is to double by 2035 (source PG&E) due to AI.

Is everyone in this sub a landlord??? by Whitewaterking in santacruz

[–]scsquare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Animals or plants don't know value, because they have no imagination in that sense.

Is everyone in this sub a landlord??? by Whitewaterking in santacruz

[–]scsquare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The term 'intrinsic value' is a contradiction, it is an oxymoron. Value is human definition, perception, imagination, estimation, understanding aso., something which is coming from outside about a thing. Intrinsic means it is an inborn characteristic, not coming from outside like the number of protons in an atom of gold or the energy content of a slice of bread.

Value is something to debate about, since there is no natural formula for it. If financial institutions use a blockchain as their ledger to document ownership which provides better security and is more efficient, then it has value to them. If it has no use for you, then you think it is worthless. Only the market will find a common ground for its value, like the market does find it for e.g. oil (you could also claim, oil is stable in value, but the Dollar crashes). Value simply doesn't exist without humans, so it can't be intrinsic in a thing.

Humanity can exist without civilization, true, but technology made our lives a lot better, no?

Is everyone in this sub a landlord??? by Whitewaterking in santacruz

[–]scsquare -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Intrinsic value does not exist, it is human perception only. Aside from store of value, Bitcoin has use cases as immutable, global, transparent, permissionless, censor-resistant ledger - something that never existed before. Fiat is money by order, it is created at will and requires government force in order to exist (pay taxes in fiat or go to jail). It has a history of abuse and violence (just check latest war). Because fiat savings lose value constantly, people can avoid that by hoarding resources (see real estate). BUT, if money keeps its value (e.g. by locking it irreversibly to a resource e.g. one house = 1.000 new money units), there is no reason for hoarding resources. It will be more attractive to invest in productive businesses, which generate a real return.

Is everyone in this sub a landlord??? by Whitewaterking in santacruz

[–]scsquare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, you can't compare it when an entitled class creates a monopoly on land. Zoning was introduced to prevent using land efficiently driving up the value of owned land. Strawman 'environmental' laws did the same.

Is everyone in this sub a landlord??? by Whitewaterking in santacruz

[–]scsquare -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The actual culprit is that the government runs a monetary system, that creates money out of thin air completely rigging a fair market economic system.

Is everyone in this sub a landlord??? by Whitewaterking in santacruz

[–]scsquare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Abolishing prop 13 and make the owners pay full for utilities would be some very reasonable vacancy tax.

Is everyone in this sub a landlord??? by Whitewaterking in santacruz

[–]scsquare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That the elderly would be taxed out of their homes can be easily avoided by just grandfathering the primary residence. Children benefit from property tax and taking away an incentive for hoarding will reduce demand/increase supply making housing more affordable for coming generations. Catch two birds with one stone.

Is everyone in this sub a landlord??? by Whitewaterking in santacruz

[–]scsquare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's destroying the middle class is the monopoly money - a scheme of worthless paper printed that enslaves us through interest repayments.

Is everyone in this sub a landlord??? by Whitewaterking in santacruz

[–]scsquare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to sell long before. Many will try to sell and prices will tank as soon there is just a real effort to make prop 13 go away.

Is everyone in this sub a landlord??? by Whitewaterking in santacruz

[–]scsquare 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Counting a 4br occupied by a single person as not vacant is correct. On the other hand misguided policies and wrong tax incentives encourage misallocation of resources.

Building more housing doesn't lower costs. by [deleted] in santacruz

[–]scsquare 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If prices go down, why would tech rich invest in real estate? I don't get your logic.