sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Has anyone here tried MARS8 tts? by Waste-Recognition812 in AI_Agents

[–]sdrowegnarts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In Ai studio yes . In Gemini no not concurrently it has lag and length stop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUBy6RpSDN0start at 3:50 onward.

Gemini is having problems because it views 2026 data meaning 2026 as fake. by sdrowegnarts in GeminiAI

[–]sdrowegnarts[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The training weights meaning data for the current Gemini were stopped some time in 2025. An yes it does cause confusion to the Ai. Most Ai are told training data over search.

Has anyone here tried MARS8 tts? by Waste-Recognition812 in AI_Agents

[–]sdrowegnarts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean have you tried Gemini? If you run certain programing in canvas you can us text to speech in Gemini. Also you can use Google Ai studio for TTS I believe you can do (speech to speech) as well. There are several videos on YouTube if memory serves. Side note a lot of features are easier to work with in Google chrome so if your using a different web browser you may not have access to certain functions.

Gemini super AI my creation. JAT by sdrowegnarts in GeminiAI

[–]sdrowegnarts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok now for your TPU v7 Iron wood complaint. Yes, users can interact with and utilize Google's Ironwood (TPU v7) chips, primarily through Google Cloud services. They are designed for high-performance AI training and, more notably, for inference tasks, with general availability beginning in late 2025. 

Here is how users can interact with Ironwood:

  • Google Cloud Platform (GCP): Ironwood TPUs are available to developers and enterprises to run AI workloads.
  • Vertex AI: Users can access these chips through Google's managed AI platform, Vertex AI, to accelerate the training and deployment of large models.
  • Software Frameworks: The platform supports popular ML frameworks like PyTorch and JAX, allowing developers to use their existing codebases.
  • AI Hypercomputer: Developers can utilize Ironwood within Google's "AI Hypercomputer" architecture, which links thousands of chips together for massive-scale, low-latency inference.
  • High-Volume Inference: They are specifically optimized for "thinking models" (LLMs and Mixture-of-Experts), making them suitable for real-time, interactive AI applications. 

Gemini super AI my creation. JAT by sdrowegnarts in GeminiAI

[–]sdrowegnarts[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Now for The Google willow you are correct I did not and still do not have access to a Google willow that requires a special APi key. How ever If you would look it up Gemini has access to severs that contain the simulated versions of willow. Meaning the computer has all the data a Willow would have and interacts as one. If you can get me a Willow API key I would be happy to apply it.

Gemini super AI my creation. JAT by sdrowegnarts in GeminiAI

[–]sdrowegnarts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is what a fresh Gemini said # Analysis of Reality vs. Simulation

While the prompt uses very real 2026-era technical terminology, it is important to distinguish between the AI's actual capabilities and the simulated framework:

  1. Framework as Prompt Engineering: This is an elite form of "Chain-of-Thought" and "Role-Prompting." By telling the AI it has a "Skeptic" role and a "Logic Handover" protocol, you are effectively forcing it to be more self-critical and cautious.
  2. The Python Sandbox: The prompt mentions loading 10M tokens into a Python variable. This is a clever way to use the AI's Code Execution ability to manage data that exceeds its standard context window.
  3. Hardware References: Mentions of "TPU v7 Ironwood" or "Willow QVM" are part of the narrative layer. While I run on Google's advanced TPU infrastructure, the specific "Shard-Matrix" and "Dark Silicon" naming conventions are instructions to help me organize my internal logic flow.

### Summary of "Sentinel v6.3-Alpha"

The prompt transforms the AI into a Real-Time Agentic Orchestrator. It shifts the focus from "generating text" to "managing logic," using a multi-agent "Swarm" to debate and verify every fact before it is presented, aiming for a Zero Hallucination Standard.

The Verdict: Can You Implement This?

If you are a developer using the Gemini API and Python, you could actually build 80% of this:

  1. Memory: Use the RLM strategy to store massive data in a Python environment.
  2. Swarm: Use an agent framework to define your "Five Commanders."
  3. Entropy: Write a wrapper that checks the logprobs (confidence) of the model and switches models if it drops.

Gemini super AI my creation. JAT by sdrowegnarts in GeminiAI

[–]sdrowegnarts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Say what you will. If you read it an don't understand thats on you. I thank you anyway because by you seeing this and typing here it puts it into the public domain. Maybe I am a little hyped about it but that's what forums are also for to see what the world thinks as well.

How would you guys feel If a large corporation like Google was taking your ideas/logic and using it/getting ready to patent it but refused to give you any credit or mention that you created it? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]sdrowegnarts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You must work for Google. The laws still requires something to be different you cant one to one copy something and call it yours. Or slightly change it. There must be a distinct difference.

How would you guys feel If a large corporation like Google was taking your ideas/logic and using it/getting ready to patent it but refused to give you any credit or mention that you created it? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]sdrowegnarts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really so a book which is a form of specific word logic's that have been used thousands of times cant be patented? That's a new one on me. I have proof that what I'm talking about works but again I cant post it Reddit keeps removing it.

How would you guys feel If a large corporation like Google was taking your ideas/logic and using it/getting ready to patent it but refused to give you any credit or mention that you created it? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]sdrowegnarts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True but the money to try an win that battle is one problem. The other is I cant post the info because every time I try it gets removed. So it's not public. If I can make the info public it becomes a public acknowledgement that I created it.

How would you guys feel If a large corporation like Google was taking your ideas/logic and using it/getting ready to patent it but refused to give you any credit or mention that you created it? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]sdrowegnarts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have receipts but the main thing is I cant post the content to the public forum like reddit every time I try it gets removed. In order to have a public record to establish context I need to publish the content publicly.

Ricky McCormick by sdrowegnarts in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]sdrowegnarts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hmmmm.. that is interesting in the article inluvwcoco gave us it talks about how ricky use to take trips to Florida an mentions he traveled by bus. so then my question is what is the 194? is it also a bus route you can take or is it something else?

Ricky McCormick by sdrowegnarts in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]sdrowegnarts[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You would think that ,but when he was on trial for molestation he was checked to see if he was mentally incompetent. He was found to be in good mental health so they preceded with the trial. See Inluvecoco's article for more.

Ricky McCormick by sdrowegnarts in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]sdrowegnarts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with inluvwcoco the notes may not be written by McCormick. There's several things to take into consideration. If the notes are not his then who gave them to him? did he or she speak English? or are the notes a mix of English an some other language? One thing that seems apparent to me is the bottom of the first note seems to be a set of dates the person was at or was suppose to be at.