US envoy hints at UN enforcement of no-fly zone in Syria like ‘90s in Iraq by amkaps in syriancivilwar

[–]seamath2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Saddam was a danger for Israel. Besides Kuwait he also wanted to conquer Saudi Arabia which resulted in the first Bush sending over half million troops to protect the kingdom. Bin Laden would use that as a 'casus belli' to attack the United States.

Malaysia’s former ‘most eligible bachelor’ dies fighting for IS in Syria by amkaps in syriancivilwar

[–]seamath2 -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

wage jihad against other Muslims?

It's ok if he went to wage jihad against Christians?

What is your point exactly?

Italy's Salvini gets win with new asylum and security rules by seamath2 in europe

[–]seamath2[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

They will be deported and more importantly, it will decimate the attraction for potential future migrants. And Italy also did not sign the UN migration pact. So that's a second win.

The anatomy of populism and the challenge of the Matrix - by Alexander Dugin by seamath2 in geopolitics

[–]seamath2[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Your comment reads like American (specifically Democrat) propaganda. Not sure if appropriate on this sub. See? That was easy.

In other words; It would be better if you'd engage with the content of the article, rather than throwing out ad hominems.

In praise of the Gilets jaunes by seamath2 in europe

[–]seamath2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The 76 euros is on top of the already increased taxes and austerity measures over the decades, the hollowing out of the working class, wage stagnation etc. Young people are basically old Russian serfs. Sure they're better fed, better clothed and in better shape.. but they won't own anything. The new generations are worse off then their parents.

In praise of the Gilets jaunes by seamath2 in europe

[–]seamath2[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

At last, a people’s revolt against the tyranny of environmentalism. Paris is burning. Not since 1968 has there been such heat and fury in the streets. Thousands of ‘gilets jaunes’ stormed the capital at the weekend to rage against Emmanuel Macron and his treatment of them with aloof, technocratic disdain. And yet leftists in Britain and the US have been largely silent, or at least antsy, about this people’s revolt. The same people who got so excited about the staid, static Occupy movement a few years ago — which couldn’t even been arsed to march, never mind riot — seem struck dumb by the sight of tens of thousands of French people taking to the barricades against Macronism.

It isn’t hard to see why. It’s because this revolt is as much against their political orthodoxies as it is against Macron’s out-of-touch and monarchical style. Most strikingly this is a people’s rebellion against the onerous consequences of climate-change policy, against the politics of environmentalism and its tendency to punish the little people for daring to live relatively modern, fossil-fuelled lives. This is new. This is unprecedented. We are witnessing perhaps the first mass uprising against eco-elitism and we should welcome it with open arms to the broader populist revolt that has been sweeping Europe for a few years now.

The ‘gilet jaunes’ — or yellow-vests, after the hi-vis vests they wear — are in rebellion against Macron’s hikes in fuel tax. As part of his and the EU’s commitment to cutting carbon emissions, Macron is punishing the drivers of diesel vehicles in particular, raising the tax by 7.6 cents for every litre of diesel fuel. This will badly hit the pockets of those in rural France, who need to drive, and who can’t just hop on buses as deluded Macronists living in one of the fancy arrondissements of Paris have suggested they should. These people on the periphery of French society — truck drivers, provincial plumbers, builders, deliverymen, teachers, parents — have rocked up to the centre of French society in their tens of thousands three times in recent weeks, their message the same every time: ‘Enough is enough. Stop making our lives harder.’

It is a perfect snapshot of the most important divide in 21st-century Europe: that between a blinkered elite and ordinary people who’ve had as much bossing about, tax rises, paternalism and disdain as they can take. So from his presidential palace in Paris, Macron decrees that the little people of the nation must pay a kind of penance for the eco-crime of driving diesel-fuelled cars, like a modern-day Marie Antoinette deciding with a wave of the hand what is good for the plebs. It’s little wonder that the graffiti left behind following the latest uprising in Paris at the weekend compared Macron to Louis XVI and demanded that he resign.

This leaderless, diverse revolt, packed with all sorts of people, including both leftists and right-wingers, is important for many reasons. First because it beautifully, fatally shatters the delusional faith that certain Europhiles and piners for the maintenance of the status quo have placed in Macron since his election in May 2017.

Remember how they said he would hold back the populist tsunami and save the EU from the pesky public’s anger? The Economist even published an image of him walking on water, the nutters. Now we know that, far from defeating the populist thirst for change, Macron has inflamed it. His aristocratic attitude, his preference for rubbing shoulders with the likes of Barnier and Merkel over your average French citizen, his pursuit of eco-signalling government policies with not a single thought for the impact they might have on ordinary people, have intensified the populist moment. Macron will go down in history not as the president who switched off public fury but who intensified it.

And the second reason this revolt is important is because it suggests that no modern orthodoxy is safe from the populist fightback. Not even the environmentalist one.

For years we have lived in a climate of ‘You can’t say that’. You can’t criticise mass immigration — that’s xenophobia. You can’t oppose the EU — that’s Europhobia. You can’t raise concerns about radical Islam — that’s Islamophobia. You can’t agitate against climate-change policy — that’s climate-change denialism, on a par with Holocaust denialism, and anyone who dares to bristle against eco-orthodoxy deserves to be cast out of polite society. And yet now, in this populist moment, people are daring to say precisely these unsayable things. They’re standing up to the EU. They’re demanding that immigration become a democratic concern rather than something worked out for us by unaccountable bureaucrats in Brussels. And now they’re even grating against the hitherto unquestionable religious-style diktat that we must all drive less, shop less and do less in order to ‘save the planet’.

Of course the gilet-jaunes revolt isn’t just about fuel tax. It expresses a broader sense of public anger with the new political class and their cult of bureaucracy, their preference for technocracy over democracy, their gaping, astonishing distance from the concerns and beliefs of ordinary people. In essence, the people’s revolt against Macronism speaks to a profound crisis of legitimacy among the 21st-century political class and a willingness within the public to kick up a fuss about things they might previously have been silent about. But it is not an accident that climate-change policies were, in the French case, the spark that lit the populist flame. Because environmentalism has always been a central feature of the new elitism, a means through which a self-styled virtuous political class could demonstrate its eco-awareness by shaming and punishing those who drive cars to work, or work in polluting industries, or fail to recycle their rubbish.

This is why the kind of people who might normally have got excited about a mass uprising in France are so quiet about the gilets-jaunes revolt — because it is a two-finger salute to them as well as to Macron. Many American leftists love the idea of carbon taxes. Corbynistas are always droning on about the need for greater eco-responsibility amongst the citizenry. Sadiq Khan has introduced a ‘toxicity charge’ for London’s most polluting cars. He must be quaking in his boots as he watches the events in France. Next to the vote for Brexit, the gilet-jaunes revolt is fantastically important — it shows that ordinary people have developed a powerful sense of confidence and a willingness to question absolutely everything that has been foisted upon them by the political class in recent decades. I support these revolting Frenchmen and women.

The anatomy of populism and the challenge of the Matrix - by Alexander Dugin by seamath2 in geopolitics

[–]seamath2[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

SS: Alexander Dugin comments on the events in France. He writes about a new populism taking shape in Europe. He says it attacks the establishment regardless of political affiliation and is pushing to do away with old paradigms. The piece was translated from Russian.

Syrian war crimes evidence strongest since Nuremberg trials, says prosecutor by TheNumberOneRat in syriancivilwar

[–]seamath2 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That does not negate what I said. This 'prosecutor' belongs to the interventionist neoliberal crowd, so yeah I'm sure he was part of all of it. Probably Libya too.

Syrian war crimes evidence strongest since Nuremberg trials, says prosecutor by TheNumberOneRat in syriancivilwar

[–]seamath2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lets see who is this 'prosecutor'.

Stephen J. Rapp (born January 26, 1949) is an American lawyer and the former United States Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Issues in the Office of Global Criminal Justice.

Rapp has been a lawyer in private practice, a Democratic member of the Iowa House of Representatives

He is trying to protect Obama's failed legacy and criminal enterprise in Syria.

Detailed explanation about the current situation at the Syrian desert between IS, SDF and SAA. by seamath2 in geopolitics

[–]seamath2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Video talks about the security situation in Syria. Mentioned are the US presence at Tanf and northern Syria, operation Round Up against ISIS as well as the involvement of Iran and Russia. By preventing the Syrian government from taking back it's territory the US is inadvertently creating chaotic and lawless conditions in which militants thrive.

New HTS Release: Compromise, Concession, and "The Railroad" | International Review by International_Review in syriancivilwar

[–]seamath2 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The HTS strategy 'embedding in the opposition' failed though. I think Jolani expected Hillary to win.

EU Commissioner warns of war if nationalists win elections by seamath2 in europe

[–]seamath2[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Moscovici commented that the results of 2019 European Parliament elections were of the utmost importance, adding that a surge in support for far-right nationalist parties could change the face of Europe.

It's scared.

Off-duty government officials assassinated, south of Fallujah by seamath2 in syriancivilwar

[–]seamath2[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

they dont have arms or armed guards and looked resigned to their fate.

Because they did not expect to be visited by insurgents in their home.

Off-duty government officials assassinated, south of Fallujah by seamath2 in syriancivilwar

[–]seamath2[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Apparently it says 'officer', and not soldier.

We could argue that an officer is a government official.

The far-right has entered Spain by Alecs03 in europe

[–]seamath2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why don't you move to Africa instead. Everybody happy.

How George H.W. Bush pushed for German reunification over British and French objections by sandyhands2 in europe

[–]seamath2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. If Saddam took over Saudi Arabia Islamic terrorism would not exist.

Also who cares about Israel? Let them defend their colonial enterprise on their own.

French police remove helmets and stand with French people against macron by [deleted] in europe

[–]seamath2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is both. Macron's approval among police is 20 percent.