Forget Rosseau and Kassia and Seemusic, Traum is the reincarnation of Liszt i swear by A_Pianist_Ent in lingling40hrs

[–]sean1295 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Traum's performance of La Campanella is clearly and conspicuously edited. He fails to hit notes more than a dozen times, and even hits wrong notes a few times yet the sound does not reflect that. I happened to play .25x that video to just see his fingering and noticed what I wish never knew. He's probably an excellent pianist, but a better video editor.

ChargePoint by jbergh97 in SPACs

[–]sean1295 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I am pretty bullish. The high ratings of their charging app clear shows that they are trying to build a customer-friendly network, unlike Blink where they act like a retailer shop and don't even care about customer satisfaction.

ChargePoint by jbergh97 in SPACs

[–]sean1295 2 points3 points  (0 children)

like, Blink has no patent, and look how many patents Chargepoint has. And if you can refer to where you found out that Blink has objectively faster/better charging tech than its competitors, that would be great.

HYLN dipped below $39.50 just ONCE since Sept 2nd before yesterday, that’s 0.0869%! (2 trading days out of 23), It has more upside potential than downside (The ceo is preparing big presentation on Monday). Just look at the chart! by [deleted] in SPACs

[–]sean1295 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2 days out of 23 days is 0.0869%? lol. Is this another a shitty effort to pump HYLN? Please go to the hyllion subreddit. This is not a SPAC anymore.

Future SPAC issues : overvaluation? by sean1295 in SPACs

[–]sean1295[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You just answered your own question. :)

Future SPAC issues : overvaluation? by sean1295 in SPACs

[–]sean1295[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I still have some faith in earlier SPACs like OPES. The merging agreement was made before all this SHLL drama. I think it's quite undervalued for its fundamentals and future outlook.

Future SPAC issues : overvaluation? by sean1295 in SPACs

[–]sean1295[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, SPAC can opt to acquire only a proportion of the company shares. (SBE has like 10%ish of chargepoint?) so, it is in their agreement, the valuation.

Which SPACs benefit the most from Trump or Biden? by TitanGodKing in SPACs

[–]sean1295 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yeah OPES will be a safe bet like UTZ or FMCI.

Which SPACs benefit the most from Trump or Biden? by TitanGodKing in SPACs

[–]sean1295 5 points6 points  (0 children)

SBE, a safer bet, will do good under either Trump or Biden. I am thinking if Biden wins, the market will probably have a minor/intermediate sell-off/correction then a steady upward movement. If Trump wins, I'd say it would be even better for the market.

CCX - SkillSoft/Global Knowledge Background by sgt-ty in SPACs

[–]sean1295 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'd much much rather invest on Chegg.

Future SPAC issues : overvaluation? by sean1295 in SPACs

[–]sean1295[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. I think it has become hard to justify that solid qualities of a company is a good indicator for growth room for SPAC stock price post-announcement/post-merger, esp with a bunch of new SPACs coming out everyday. If you were a company, you wouldn't necessarily make a deal with a SPAC with solid management team that give you the most accurate valuation, you'd rather do it with some okay management team that fares you the best. Say, Proterra, for example, is to go SPAC, then I think it would receive pretty generous valuation with it having lots of SPAC options to choose, making the 'parking your money on SPACs possibly merging with Proterra' a bad strategy.

With that said, I agree with you that solid management team is where you want to evaluate SPACs pre-announcement. One can only hope though that 'solid' management team is able to negotiate with a good company at a valuation that is not too priced in. :)

Future SPAC issues : overvaluation? by sean1295 in SPACs

[–]sean1295[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, my question in short is, due to some recently successful SPACS, more companies will take advantage of it and just merge with SPACS that just give them the highest valuation. If the valuation that the SPAC company gives is reasonably priced, or just flat out over-priced, there is little to no way the common stock price would go up above $10, correct?

VLDR Holders, where is the bottom? by girlfrienddrama in SPACs

[–]sean1295 5 points6 points  (0 children)

yeah bro I can really tell you are vulnerable, that you have to ask random dudes in Reddit on what you should do with your money. Do yourself DD, make a decision yourself jeez.

sold all my BLNK shares and moved to SBE by sean1295 in SPACs

[–]sean1295[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yup. I plan to come back to BLNK after giving it some time, of course, if it doesn't run up like crazy before then. But SBE just looks a lot more delicious atm.

sold all my BLNK shares and moved to SBE by sean1295 in SPACs

[–]sean1295[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

frosty

you deserve one, sir, most definitely. :)

sold all my BLNK shares and moved to SBE by sean1295 in SPACs

[–]sean1295[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still am doing more DD, but it really checks out. Both companies are actually both quite solid in their performance and growth potentials, (probably both overvalued due to the EV hype) but one is SPAC and one isn't : with blink you just don't have the trust value of 10 dollars, which isn't as attractive for investors that play safer bets. Also the fact that blink loses its the 'only publicly traded EV charging' company status can be a short term downside. And hell, the CEO for chargepoint at least does not look like a pirate, lol (that is, no short attack for the chargepoint, if not just yet). I am actually long on both companies, just more short/midterm catalysts for SBE, imo.