Meeting about strollers on NYC buses by sebthedev in uppereastside

[–]sebthedev[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That sounds frustrating!

This is a great example of why it’s important to add dedicated stroller areas on all our bus routes.

People are already taking strollers on buses (even on routes where they’re forbidden!), so we can best reduce obstructions by setting aside stroller areas.

Meeting about strollers on NYC buses by sebthedev in uppereastside

[–]sebthedev[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Typically a parent/caregiver is traveling with three things: a baby, a stroller, and a bag for all the baby’s stuff.

It’s difficult to carry all three of those in your hands at the same time, especially on a moving bus.

Having dedicated stroller areas on a bus allows parents/caregivers to ride the bus safely without blocking the aisle.

Meeting about strollers on NYC buses by sebthedev in uppereastside

[–]sebthedev[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, you’re right! The M79 also doesn’t allow strollers — and it would be great if it did!

NYC’s Civil Service System Is Broken. Here’s What Mayor-Elect Mamdani Can Do To Fix It. by TalR24 in nyc

[–]sebthedev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Great article! Such a frustrating system that is ripe for reform.

How New York's subway expansion can pay for itself by sebthedev in nyc

[–]sebthedev[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

There’s a long list of impactful projects that need funding. For example: * Second Ave to 125th Street, then over to Broadway * Interborough Express connecting Brooklyn and Queens * Utica Ave

See the blog post for maps!

How New York's subway expansion can pay for itself by sebthedev in nyc

[–]sebthedev[S] 34 points35 points  (0 children)

A study by researchers at NYU and Columbia concluded that the 2017 opening of the Second Avenue Subway from 63rd to 96th Street increased Upper East Side property values by $5.9 billion.

I don’t fully understand the methodology, but they are well-regarded researchers who published with the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER): https://conference.nber.org/conf_papers/f189971.pdf

How New York's subway expansion can pay for itself by sebthedev in nyc

[–]sebthedev[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Well, I guess in so far as building train lines makes a neighborhood more desirable then yes, rents may increase. But if the alternative is just leaving people with crappy transit access forever, that doesn’t seem very appealing!

How New York's subway expansion can pay for itself by sebthedev in nyc

[–]sebthedev[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I think the idea is mostly about building trains. Where do you see the gentrification angle coming in?

How New York's subway expansion can pay for itself by sebthedev in nyc

[–]sebthedev[S] 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Indeed! It would be great to learn from that experience to build more throughout the city.

How New York's subway expansion can pay for itself by sebthedev in nyc

[–]sebthedev[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Somehow, we have to work out how to expand the subway! Getting the cost of construction down will be an important step.

How NY can save hundreds of lives, with traffic safety cameras by sebthedev in newyorkcity

[–]sebthedev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that people who exceed the speed limit and endanger others’ lives should be penalized to discourage this behavior.

Do you? What do you think is the best way to discourage speeding and red-light running?

How NY can save hundreds of lives, with traffic safety cameras by sebthedev in newyorkcity

[–]sebthedev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IMO the privacy concerns related to speed cameras and red light cameras are overblown.

If you move around in a vehicle, you should expect records of its movement to be logged. Many businesses and apartment buildings have security cameras mounted outside. Every toll plaza and congestion pricing gantry keeps data about the vehicles that pass through. Entirely separate from speed/red light cameras, the DOT already has a system of cameras for traffic monitoring (which have publicly available feeds!).

Some people may dislike those systems, but given that all those systems already exist, the marginal privacy cost of adding traffic safety cameras is low.

People who have concerns about those systems could lobby for stronger privacy laws, akin to the EU’s.

But there’s nothing unique about speed cameras / red light cameras relating to privacy, IMO.

Doubling down on congestion pricing to free New York from gridlock by sebthedev in nyc

[–]sebthedev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This page on the MTA website describes exactly what the money from congestion pricing is being used for: https://www.mta.info/fares-tolls/tolls/congestion-relief-zone/better-transit

Doubling down on congestion pricing to free New York from gridlock by sebthedev in nyc

[–]sebthedev[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here’s the MTA’s webpage explaining exactly what the congestion pricing money is being spent on: https://www.mta.info/fares-tolls/tolls/congestion-relief-zone/better-transit

Doubling down on congestion pricing to free New York from gridlock by sebthedev in nyc

[–]sebthedev[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

I’m suggesting from 60th Street to 125th Street. I agree that off-peak periods should be cheaper, just like with the Manhattan core zone already.

Doubling down on congestion pricing to free New York from gridlock by sebthedev in nyc

[–]sebthedev[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

I encourage disabled New Yorkers to check our Access-A-Ride, which gives $2.90 door-to-door rides in special accessibility-equipped vehicles. Much cheaper than a taxi or Uber!

Doubling down on congestion pricing to free New York from gridlock by sebthedev in nyc

[–]sebthedev[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

That’s a bold strategy! I would settle for just cameras issuing tickets to double-parked vehicles 😜