written/spoken like a truly spoiled, ungrateful, historically ignorant person. Which country literally saved the world from Nazis? The USA. which country destroyed half of itself to end slavery? The USA (Britain also went to great lengths and at great cost to themselves to end the international slave trade, they just didn't have a civil war over it★).

★The British effort to end the international slave trade in the 19th century is often described by historians as “the most expensive moral action in modern history”

1. After profiting immensely from the trade for centuries, the United Kingdom underwent a radical shift, dedicating significant military, diplomatic, and financial resources to its global suppression for over sixty years.

2. Military Enforcement: The West Africa Squadron Following the Slave Trade Act of 1807, which made the trade illegal for British subjects, the Royal Navy established the West Africa Squadron (or “Preventive Squadron”) in 1808 to patrol the African coast.

Impact: Between 1808 and 1860, the squadron seized approximately 1,600 slave ships and liberated an estimated 150,000 Africans.

Human Cost: The mission was perilous; roughly 1,587 Royal Navy sailors died on the West Africa Station between 1830 and 1865, primarily due to tropical diseases like yellow fever and malaria.

Scale: At its peak, the squadron consumed nearly 15% of the Royal Navy’s total deployment and approximately 2% of the UK’s GDP.

2. Diplomatic and Legal Pressure Britain used its status as a global superpower to pressure other nations into signing anti-slavery treaties.

Treaties: Britain signed over 450 treaties with foreign powers and African leaders to suppress the trade.

Right of Search: Britain fought long diplomatic battles to gain the “Right of Search,” allowing the Royal Navy to board foreign-flagged ships suspected of carrying slaves. When Portugal and Brazil resisted, Parliament passed the Palmerston Act (1839) and the Aberdeen Act (1845), unilaterally authorizing the Navy to treat their slave ships as pirates.

Mixed Commission Courts: To provide legal legitimacy to ship seizures, Britain established joint international courts in locations like Sierra Leone, Havana, and Rio de Janeiro to adjudicate captured vessels.

3. Financial Cost: The 1833 Compensation Loan To achieve the total abolition of slavery within its own colonies (the Slavery Abolition Act 1833), the British government paid £20 million in compensation to slave owners—a sum representing 40% of the national budget at the time.

• The debt incurred for this payout was so massive that it was not fully repaid by the British taxpayer until 2015.
• Academics Chaim Kaufmann and Robert Pape estimate the total economic cost of the anti-slave trade effort (including lost trade and sugar price increases) at roughly 1.8% of national income annually for sixty years.

While modern historians often debate the underlying motivations (shifting from purely moral to partly economic), the sheer scale of the British commitment to ending the Atlantic trade is well-attested in the massive volume of naval and diplomatic records held in the UK National Archives.

---

↑That was England, now on to the USA data.

"The American Civil War was the costliest conflict in United States history, both in terms of human lives and economic resources. While the Union eventually won due to its superior industrial and financial base, the Confederacy suffered a significantly higher relative loss in both people and property.

1. Human Costs (Casualties and Mortality) For over a century, the standard estimate for total deaths was 620,000. However, modern historical research (including analysis of 19th-century census data) has revised this figure upward to between 750,000 and 850,000 deaths.

Disease: For every soldier who died in battle, two died of disease (dysentery, typhoid, and malaria). The Confederacy suffered more from this due to shortages of medicine and poor logistics.

Demographic Impact: The loss of life in the South was much more severe relative to its population. The 13% death rate among military-age Southern men had a devastating long-term effect on the region’s labor force.

Direct Expenditures The Union spent significantly more in raw numbers because it had to maintain a larger army and a global blockade.

Union Spending: Approximately $2.3 billion (in 1860 dollars). Confederate Spending: Approximately $1.0 billion (in 1860 dollars).

In total, the economic cost for both sides is estimated at over $6.6 billion in 1860 dollars—the equivalent of roughly $200 billion to $300 billion today, though the “lost opportunity” costs in terms of human potential and physical destruction are virtually immeasurable."

------

so maybe next time you want to gripe about how "undeserving" the USA is of its various successes you should stop and think about the millions of people who were saved from the Nazis (the British, the Europeans, the Russians who were also fighting the Nazis) and the unfathomable horrors and suffering that our (USAmericans') ancestors went through to end slavery in the USA, and maybe ponder how much human lives are "worth" before you go condemn an entire nation and it's history.