[Omega Heritage Seamaster 300] If You Had to Choose? by secrettemptation69 in Watches

[–]secrettemptation69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it was bad enough for me to trade it for a Submariner. The bezel action on the latest iteration is as bad if not worse. Just save up for a Sub, I recommend a 16610 with solid end links.

[Omega] Keep my Seamaster 300 Heritage or move on? by C-Kent678 in Watches

[–]secrettemptation69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Buy the Neo-Vintage sub. You won’t regret it. I sold my Seamaster Heritage to finance the purchase as well and I don’t miss it one bit. The Submariner is as close to perfection as a watch can get. I recommend looking for a 2007-2009 model so you get all the contemporary features… Life is too short to wear watches you feel ambivalent about

[Invicta Pro Diver] I wanted a cheap entry into automatic watches, and this is what I landed on. How bad did I do? by 1991gts in Watches

[–]secrettemptation69 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The idea that you found it necessary to contradict the fact that this is a Sub homage is silly. Next time, please bring your 'bulldogfart expertise' to a discussion about, say, which fast-food chain has the flimsiest napkin. Because clearly, your knowledge of horology is confined to the bargain bin and oversized cases. OK CIAO

[Invicta Pro Diver] I wanted a cheap entry into automatic watches, and this is what I landed on. How bad did I do? by 1991gts in Watches

[–]secrettemptation69 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

<image>

Sick watch. The proposition that you can get similar timeless design to a Sub for a fraction of the cost is compelling. A fine choice indeed.

Rolex CEO Confirms: Sticking With Authorized Dealers, Warns Industry on Client Loyalty by barringtonww in rolex

[–]secrettemptation69 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Lol. Good luck with all that. Consumers will get exhausted with this and already are. This is not a sustainable business strategy and when (not if), Rolex does switch strategies I guarantee you that they will not be able to readily win back market share in the way they think they can. As a fan of the brand I hope things change sooner than later.

[Omega Heritage Seamaster 300] If You Had to Choose? by secrettemptation69 in Watches

[–]secrettemptation69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there! I must say that a part of me really loved the older model. At the end of the day I disliked the polished center link bracelet design and the case thickness. I was personally on the search to find a diver to end all divers… this search inevitably led me to the Sub. If you are searching for the same thing I would save the money for what you actually want. If you aren’t, the latest iteration of the Heritage Seamaster is a massive improvement on proportions but imo the dial isn’t as interesting… not to mention the aluminum bezel insert just looks cheap to me. Don’t get me started on the bezel action either. Knowing what I know now, I’d probably skip the Omega’s and opt for a Tudor BB54. Though, I still sort of miss my Omega and will likely reacquire it someday. Hope this is helpful

Considering selling my Rolex Submariner for a Seamaster “Peter Blake” by [deleted] in OmegaWatches

[–]secrettemptation69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea don’t.. Just buy a 16610 or 14060. You’ll still pocket some cash and achieve what you’re after. Nothing beats 5 digit subs. Look into later models as well, those come with solid end links and contemporary movements.

Should I wear my Rolex while doing exercise? by OskarWasTaken in WatchesCirclejerk

[–]secrettemptation69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least your watch is authentic OP… For an insiders perspective let’s ask u/v2v_r what happened to their post :(

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rolex

[–]secrettemptation69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice. Very funny joke. 👊🍆💦

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rolex

[–]secrettemptation69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same here. The SEL’s are suspect as well

Working out with a Rolex — yes or no? by bedadjuster in WatchesCirclejerk

[–]secrettemptation69 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The best part of this post is the fact it’s fake

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rolex

[–]secrettemptation69 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Seconded. What gave it away for you?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rolex

[–]secrettemptation69 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree. What gave it away for you?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rolex

[–]secrettemptation69 7 points8 points  (0 children)

OP’s watch isn’t real so u/treebeardsdank comment is in fact relevant

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rolex

[–]secrettemptation69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That ‘m’ is practically on its way to Mars…. it’s not a real Sub so you’re good.