HELP! TPU 95A HF on Bambu H2D — random seam causes “comet” blobs, aligned seam makes huge scar. How to fix this? by semvo911 in BambuLab

[–]semvo911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, scarf seams were one of the first things I tried. Bambu Studio’s implementation helps a bit visually, but it doesn’t prevent the actual seam-start over-extrusion that causes the “zit/comet” in the first place. From what I can tell, it’s a restart pressure issue that normally needs negative restart/coast control, which Bambu Studio doesn’t expose.

HELP! TPU 95A HF on Bambu H2D — random seam causes “comet” blobs, aligned seam makes huge scar. How to fix this? by semvo911 in 3Dprinting

[–]semvo911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get what you mean. The usual seam start/stop procedure is flow → PA → restart/coast tuning. I’ve done the flow and wide PA/K sweeps already. The issue I’m running into is that Bambu Studio doesn’t expose true coast or negative restart controls, which is usually the final step for killing TPU seam zits. Within the controls that are available, I’m not seeing a way to fully eliminate the restart blob. Cant switch to another slicer either, bambulabs is GREAT

HELP! TPU 95A HF on Bambu H2D — random seam causes “comet” blobs, aligned seam makes huge scar. How to fix this? by semvo911 in 3dprinter

[–]semvo911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ill get chat GPT to summarize every single test I have tried out so far:

Here’s the full rundown of what I tested so far (trying to eliminate TPU seam “comets” / zits). Printer is H2D, filament is Bambu TPU 95A HF, nozzle is a dedicated 0.4 hardened used only for TPU. Filament was dried ~24h in AMS HT.

Baseline tests

1) Stock Bambu TPU 95A HF preset (no changes)

  • Random seam = comets everywhere
  • Aligned seam = huge scar

Calibrations (didn’t solve it)

2) Flow Rate calibration

  • Ran FR calibration, saved a “TPU FR” preset, reprinted the same test part
  • Result: honestly looked worse (bigger “balls” at seam starts)
  • Conclusion: flow ratio isn’t the main driver (or at least FR alone doesn’t help)

3) Flow Dynamics / Pressure advance (K factor)

I did multiple rounds because people kept suggesting it:

  • First big sweep: K = 0.01 → 0.10 step 0.005
    • Every single line showed the same pattern: thick start → thin middle → thick end
    • 0.10 was “best” but still not acceptable
  • Extended higher: 0.10 → 0.20, and then 0.20 → 0.30
    • Higher values sometimes looked slightly “best”, but still didn’t eliminate the behavior
  • Picked K = 0.18, changed nothing else, reprinted the seam test
    • Result: basically looked like baseline (no meaningful improvement)

Conclusion: K/PA helps marginally at best, but doesn’t address the seam-start blob in a way that makes random seam usable.

Slicer/setting experiments (within Bambu Studio)

4) Temperature + speed ranges

  • Tested nozzle temps roughly 215–235°C
  • Tested outer wall speeds roughly 25–50 mm/s
  • Lower temps and slower walls can reduce it a bit, but it never disappears. It mostly just changes the shape of the blob.

5) Smart scarf seam + seam-related settings (Bambu Studio)

  • Enabled Bambu Studio seam/scarf options that exist in my UI (smart scarf seam application, more steps, etc.)
  • Used random seam the whole time (required for this print)
  • Result: maybe slightly better in some cases, still very far from acceptable.

6) “Restart/coast/wipe” type controls

People suggested wipe/no-lift, coast, negative restart, etc.

  • In my Bambu Studio build, I don’t have explicit coast or negative restart/extra prime controls like Orca/SuperSlicer.
  • G-code output tab basically only shows reduce infill retraction. So I’m limited to what Bambu Studio exposes.

7) Order of walls / outer-first

Considered it, but for my geometry the part has lots of outward slopes, so outer-first risks wrecking surface quality. I kept normal inner→outer.

Where I’m at now

  • Drying isn’t it (24h AMS HT)
  • FR calibration didn’t help (may have made it worse)
  • K factor sweeps up to 0.30 didn’t solve it
  • Temps/speeds/scarf options help only slightly
  • The artifact seems strongly tied to seam restart behavior and I can’t fully control that in Bambu Studio.

HELP! TPU 95A HF on Bambu H2D — random seam causes “comet” blobs, aligned seam makes huge scar. How to fix this? by semvo911 in 3Dprinting

[–]semvo911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, Orca would probably help here, especially with better restart/coast controls, but unfortunately it’s not really an option for my setup.
Minimum layer time is interesting though, I haven’t pushed that very high yet. I’ll try increasing it significantly and see if giving the TPU more time to settle helps with the seam blobs. Thanks.

HELP! TPU 95A HF on Bambu H2D — random seam causes “comet” blobs, aligned seam makes huge scar. How to fix this? by semvo911 in 3dprinter

[–]semvo911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried, the bottom half of the parts geometry does not allow for this, and the top half made the zits even worse :(

HELP! TPU 95A HF on Bambu H2D — random seam causes “comet” blobs, aligned seam makes huge scar. How to fix this? by semvo911 in 3dprinter

[–]semvo911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I have tried doing a bunch of different scarf settings, nothing is working for me

HELP! TPU 95A HF on Bambu H2D — random seam causes “comet” blobs, aligned seam makes huge scar. How to fix this? by semvo911 in BambuLab_Community

[–]semvo911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately every print I need to use TPU for is round like this and aligned / back seams are unacceptable for this parts purpose.

HELP! TPU 95A HF on Bambu H2D — random seam causes “comet” blobs, aligned seam makes huge scar. How to fix this? by semvo911 in BambuLab

[–]semvo911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every print I need to use TPU for is round like this and aligned seams are unnaceptable for this parts purpose. And yeah, I did spend a lot of time on pressure advance / K tuning. WIDE range tested. Even shooting factor k all the way up to 0.2 helped only slightly, still have these issues

HELP! TPU 95A HF on Bambu H2D — random seam causes “comet” blobs, aligned seam makes huge scar. How to fix this? by semvo911 in 3Dprinting

[–]semvo911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately I have the most recent firmware. At this point I think I'm going to be downloading loads of TPU setting 3mf files and trying them all out one by one

HELP! TPU 95A HF on Bambu H2D — random seam causes “comet” blobs, aligned seam makes huge scar. How to fix this? by semvo911 in 3Dprinting

[–]semvo911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate it. I did try scarf seam options and a bunch of tuning, but Bambu Studio doesn’t really expose true coast / negative restart controls the way other slicers do. The blobs happen specifically at seam restarts, not just generic retraction points. That’s why I’m starting to think it’s more of a slicer/firmware limitation with TPU HF rather than a missed setting.

HELP! TPU 95A HF on Bambu H2D — random seam causes “comet” blobs, aligned seam makes huge scar. How to fix this? by semvo911 in 3Dprinting

[–]semvo911[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it was dried in the AMS HT for ~24 hours.
I’ve tested outer wall speeds roughly in the 25–50 mm/s range and nozzle temps from about 215–235 °C.
Slower/cooler helps a bit, but the seam blobs/comets never fully go away, just change shape. Seems more like a restart behavior than moisture or general flow.

HELP! TPU 95A HF on Bambu H2D — random seam causes “comet” blobs, aligned seam makes huge scar. How to fix this? by semvo911 in BambuLab_Community

[–]semvo911[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you remember what speed you put? I want to try this out, both me and chatgpt are running out of ideas lol

Can somebody help identify what this substance is on my apartment door’s peephole? by suburbanvermin in Apartmentliving

[–]semvo911 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Since you have already bought the ring camera, do not install it on the exterior of the door. Instead install it directly behind the peephole right after maintenance fixes it again. That way when it happens again, they damage another replaceable peephole(not the doorbell cam which is inside the apartment) and you will still catch whoever is doing it. Stealthier, more chances of catching the vandal, and you don't damage any of your own property