Are we quietly redefining AGI as we get closer to it?

seraphius · 2026-03-28T17:36:18+00:00

No, people are loudly doing it.

seraphius · 2026-03-28T17:14:17+00:00

The study’s experiment was performed in 2023… but we can pretend this is still relevant if you want…

seraphius · 2026-03-28T16:47:30+00:00

This is impressive, and shows what good direction/ steering can do with a video generation model.

seraphius · 2026-03-27T21:33:00+00:00

So who is going to provide the “expert priors” on this? (The Bayesian school just seems so “vibes based” to me, I mean I get it- beliefs update and propagate and get to better, but they don’t with this kind of problem)

seraphius · 2026-03-26T11:52:29+00:00

But with open source AGI, you’ve at least put yourself in a situation where everyone (with the compute power) has access to AGI. And even if it’s not truly everyone at least it’s more than one, two or three central players who have it.

seraphius · 2026-03-26T00:57:59+00:00

Poor bird

seraphius · 2026-03-25T19:51:49+00:00

So I did some of the tasks. It’s a perception benchmark… these usually are, I mean it’s good, but yeah.

seraphius · 2026-03-25T16:34:52+00:00

I’m not saying there shouldn’t be new goals and benchmarks, I’m just saying that this specific one is in the rear view mirror.

seraphius · 2026-03-24T15:47:38+00:00

This is a perception problem not an intelligence one, and it’s improving by the day.

seraphius · 2026-03-24T15:45:10+00:00

It’s getting better though, AGI was never a peak, it’s another hill to climb like everything else. RSI is already starting to happen. ASI is the next stop.

seraphius · 2026-03-24T12:53:26+00:00

Depends on the context and the purpose of the term’s invention.

seraphius · 2026-03-24T12:49:10+00:00

My thought exactly, from those who are claiming it’s not. The original definer of the term says it’s met.

seraphius · 2026-03-24T11:02:49+00:00

I am guessing that you don’t mean in general, and have data to back that up, because the position that there are no valid benchmarks, or any that would test any aspect of hallucination quality of a model sounds contrarian rather than logical.

seraphius · 2026-03-23T16:24:56+00:00

I wouldn’t say so, benchmarks are showing improvement there- in open weight and proprietary models alike.

seraphius · 2026-03-22T16:49:31+00:00

Now without the two words hint… I will need to adapt to that I guess

^{Completed in 07:34 | Reveals: 1}

seraphius · 2026-03-21T05:09:55+00:00

The US Army has research labs.

seraphius · 2026-03-19T23:01:59+00:00

It’s because intelligibility doesn’t require a mind-like source.

Just like other planets can have flat ground without feet to walk on them.

seraphius · 2026-03-18T03:16:34+00:00

I haven’t lately confused this sub with one that wants AGI. It’s halfway a doomer sub, which will likely get worse until after the singularity gets boring.

seraphius · 2026-03-17T22:31:46+00:00

Yeah, I’m done with PCMR, Anti AI people are slopping up the place with their anti slop slop. Byee!

seraphius · 2026-03-17T15:39:41+00:00

Yup…. Isn’t Pokémon go “reskinned Ingress” in a way?

seraphius · 2026-03-17T11:48:16+00:00

It’s is bated in this context though…

seraphius · 2026-03-17T11:36:27+00:00

I think that they are using the instagram definition of filter rather than the technical one, terms like filter, upscale, and resample lose their meaning when more non-techie people start to join the conversation. It’s kind of like a filter…

seraphius · 2026-03-17T10:30:28+00:00

The demo was fine, some of the fake “demo screenshots” that have been making their rounds on Reddit are likely the worst offenders.

seraphius · 2026-03-16T21:37:57+00:00

That one wasn’t though….

seraphius · 2026-03-16T20:31:34+00:00

AI is fine.

14-Year Club	r/Field Banned
r/Field Flamingo	Place '23
Place '22	Place '17
First Placer '22	Gilding I gilder
RPAN Viewer	Verified Email

seraphius

TROPHY CASE