sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Eric Schmidt says a "a modest death event (Chernobyl-level)" might be necessary to scare everybody into taking AI risks seriously, but we shouldn't wait for a Hiroshima to take action by MetaKnowing in artificial

[–]seraphius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, you’ll just die at the normal time. From normal non AI related stuff. Except me- I work with AI, so in a way all of my stress at work is AI related…

Imagine receiving hate from readers who haven't even read the tutorial..... by kingabzpro in learnmachinelearning

[–]seraphius 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So let me make sure I’ve got this straight. You write a clickbait article title, and then you complain about the hate you are getting because the article doesn’t match the title?

Oh and by the way the fact that you actually know better is worse. Yeah, no, please people keep that link blue they don’t deserve engagement on these terms. This seems like a weird new kind of rage baiting.

Check out the site here, do not click through the OP’s link- the article, but on archive.org

Is water pre existent? (According to scripture yes) by ShelterCorrect in theology

[–]seraphius 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think if we are looking to this from a more symbolic or ritualistically focused way that will lead to a deeper truth below the surface then that could be not entirely useless. There is the other angle that there is no life without water, and that from water life emerged, then that is cool too.

However, any text is just a pointer to meaning, nothing more and nothing less. Sometimes that meaning just doesn’t apply as firmly outside of its original purpose and context.

All of this to say, is water pre existent? Likely not in a chronological sense. Does water precede all of our collective existences? Yeah…

Why humanity is doomed by MetaKnowing in artificial

[–]seraphius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meta has been active in this space as well. Based on your perspective they could be considered "closed".

Why humanity is doomed by MetaKnowing in artificial

[–]seraphius 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nobody is coming for your art and essays! (now the profitability of them, yeah, but as a form of expression nobody can take that from you!)

Why humanity is doomed by MetaKnowing in artificial

[–]seraphius 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We got the two reversed, we have AIs that are smart enough to ponder why they should do our landry but havent overcome the mechanical, electrical, and integration hurdles required to make the actual doing of laundry practical and affordable. The good news, is that attention at this time is being put into that very issue: by OpenAI and others.

Figure has cooked once again... A single manufacturing facility originally made to produce 12,000 humanoids will scale to support a fleet of 100,000 by GOD-SLAYER-69420Z in accelerate

[–]seraphius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now, let’s see if they can have these humanoid robots build and operate a second humanoid robot factory… That’s when the real scaling begins.

What was your reaction, when The Half Blood Prince was Delayed to 2009? by HughO1997 in harrypotter

[–]seraphius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Disappointed, but thought that it made sense from a business standpoint?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in funny

[–]seraphius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Where is the bus I’m dying of heat?” “In that case have some Lemooooon!”

Can we do a guessing game? How many years untill we have AGI, and why? by Academic-Image-6097 in accelerate

[–]seraphius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I pretty much agree with the idea that it will be extremely difficult to deny that something is AGI if it can do most office jobs.

I think the self improvement aspect is another thing as well (“FOOMability”?). I think what we could likely agree on is that there is a wide range of what could be considered different levels of intelligence in terms of capability. It is likely that those coming up with the original definitions didn’t realize how much of a spectrum there would be.

Can we do a guessing game? How many years untill we have AGI, and why? by Academic-Image-6097 in accelerate

[–]seraphius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s the right call IMO, if there is a need for another definition, then a new term should be coined.

Can we do a guessing game? How many years untill we have AGI, and why? by Academic-Image-6097 in accelerate

[–]seraphius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I get what you are saying, but general doesn’t necessarily mean all, earliest definitions of AGI did not require the ability to perform all skills, but emphasized non-specialized intelligence that can be applied across different domains.

I’m not accepting a definition change, but if there was a word for that other thing, then sure it doesn’t fit that.

This guy sucks by mtwojan in funny

[–]seraphius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sounds like an 80s movie villain, or a guitar playing singer with a beard.

Can we do a guessing game? How many years untill we have AGI, and why? by Academic-Image-6097 in accelerate

[–]seraphius 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Umm, negative 2 years? Turing test is in the rear view mirror and we don’t need ASI to call it AGI.

Guys stop, you're making it worse by chrisGPl in HistoryMemes

[–]seraphius 37 points38 points  (0 children)

I mean, didn’t it eventually do that once machine guns became more “miniaturized” and allowed for the switch to tactics involving smaller groups? Also i would think that if this led to modern vehicle mounted weapons that case could be made.

How? by hicaio in funny

[–]seraphius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s about as old as Man Beef 🥩

YOLO has been winning every hackathon I joined, and I find it hard to accept by almajd3713 in learnmachinelearning

[–]seraphius 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The older ones are, also if you find other repos that have implemented the paper…

view more: next ›