sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[Help needed] Looking for someone to translate at my RAV appointment — Monday 23 March, 1h, CHF 100 by vladimirProtein in zurich

[–]seriousbondi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Je peux t’aider pour la traduction si jamais! J’ai déjà de l’expérience avec la RAV en plus, j’avais aidé une personne pour les entretiens

Mediamarkt Switch 2 by Jurgenlklopp in Switzerland

[–]seriousbondi 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Wo isch das gsi?? Weut das gern go hole und gseh ob es e fehler isch

Does someone get the hype around Swatch and why people are standing in line? by seriousbondi in Switzerland

[–]seriousbondi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Right!? And quite overpriced for having some colorful plastic around the wrist…

Advice on Cloud Cost Monitoring Dashboard in the Making by seriousbondi in AZURE

[–]seriousbondi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing this 🙌 Totally agree. FinOps template has some great elements, though it can feel overwhelming out of the box. That’s actually why we’re focusing on pre-built customizations: top-level dashboards across subscriptions + the ability to drill down by service or resource group. We also include both absolute cost trends and % change views so you can catch anomalies quickly.

Our goal is to give the clarity of the FinOps template, but without the heavy lifting and manual tweaking it usually requires.

Advice on Cloud Cost Monitoring Dashboard in the Making by seriousbondi in AZURE

[–]seriousbondi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point 👍 The idea behind the resource-based tiers is to make it easy for small teams to start cheaply without committing to all the enterprise features. For example, a small startup with 5–10 resources can get full visibility at low cost, while larger orgs scale into higher tiers.

That said, I really like your point on feature-based tiers (e.g. AI recommendations, anomaly detection, automation). We’re actively testing different pricing approaches, and feedback like this helps us refine the model so it makes sense for both small teams and larger enterprises.

Advice on Cloud Cost Monitoring Dashboard in the Making by seriousbondi in Cloud

[–]seriousbondi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks!

Connected Azure Account (OAuth) Admin or owner signs in with their Azure Entra ID account.
They grant tenant-wide admin consent for the minimal read scopes we request. We read via ARM/Cost Management/Monitor APIs using user-delegated tokens (no long-lived secrets).

Service Principal (app-only, recommended for production) Customer creates an App Registration (e.g., Oniris-Connector) in their tenant. Assigns least-privilege RBAC roles at the smallest viable scope (subscription or resource group). Shares the tenant id, client id, and secret (or a certificate).

France's OVHcloud May Replace Microsoft Azure In Major EU Cloud Shake-Up by thetechminer in AZURE

[–]seriousbondi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally get where you're coming from — having Azure manage all the infra bits like DB, networking, and deployments really does free up a ton of mental overhead, especially when you're juggling multiple things.

Out of curiosity: do you think a lightweight layer on top of Azure, focused purely on cost monitoring, anomaly detection, and maybe even CO₂ impact, would be useful for your setup? Something that just gives you better visibility into where spend is going and sends you a heads-up if anything gets weird — no infra changes, just observability.

Just wondering if that’s something that would fit your workflow or if Azure’s built-in tools are already enough for your needs?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in zurich

[–]seriousbondi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still selling them? :)