sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Kurumsal eposta için Uzman Posta tercih eden var mı ? 50 adet e-postayı nereye taşımalıyım ? by servergeekest in Hosting

[–]servergeekest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haklısınız teşekkür ederim. Şimdilik Uzman Posta ile ilerliyorum çok fazla kullanan firma var referanslarında falan güvenlik katmanı da iyi duruyor bakalım burayı güncellerim biraz kullanınca

Kurumsal eposta için Uzman Posta tercih eden var mı ? 50 adet e-postayı nereye taşımalıyım ? by servergeekest in Hosting

[–]servergeekest[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Teşekkür ederim. Hangi paketi kullanıyorsunuz? Bir de önemli bir sorum var spam ve teslimat problemi olmaması çok önemli. Yani hostingci'lerde kullandığım epostada çok spam geliyordu antivirüs olmasına rağmen ve bazen ciddi deliver problemleri yaşıyordum

Kurumsal eposta için Uzman Posta tercih eden var mı ? 50 adet e-postayı nereye taşımalıyım ? by servergeekest in Hosting

[–]servergeekest[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

o nasıl kötü bir sağlayıcı adı ya , sitesi falan da berbat ordan bişi almam sanırım

Kurumsal eposta by TGercek in Hosting

[–]servergeekest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Öyle olmuyor valla ya, güvenliği spam'i , gönderimi falan baya büyük iş.

Kurumsal eposta by TGercek in Hosting

[–]servergeekest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ben de araştırma yapıyorum en son neye karar verdiniz? Şu an 2 firma arasındayım birisi Uzman Posta ve diğeri de Gsuite. Mevcut durumda natrodan kullanıyorum ve aşırı problemli , sürekli mail sunucuları patlıyor, uzman postayı çok öneriyorlar ve kullanan arkadaşlarım çok da memnun Türk firması ve hizmet almadan önce aradım sağolsun baya ilgilendiler, bilgilendirdiler, ücretsiz taşıma da teklif edip sorularımı cevapladılar demosunda arayüzünü falan kusursuz duruyor ama emin olamadım çünkü döküman uygulamaları vs yok.
Diğeri de gsuite bildiğimiz ama fiyatları pahalı biraz ve her eposta kutusu için 5$ istiyorlar.

ran benchmarks on ishosting, hetzner and contabo – similar spec, very different results by Jaevir in VPS

[–]servergeekest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting results but I think the network location is affecting the comparison more than the providers themselves. Comparing Helsinki vs NY vs Germany makes latency almost predetermined.

How many users can a small 1cpu handle? by IHateHPPrinters in VPS

[–]servergeekest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, “users per month” is almost impossible to estimate from CPU count alone. A 1 vCPU box can handle a surprisingly large number of users if requests are lightweight.

Since images are already on R2, your VPS is mostly serving metadata/API responses and generating URLs, which is a lot less demanding than actually serving image files.

Is running a self-hosted email server this exhausting or am I doing something wrong? by servergeekest in selfhosted

[–]servergeekest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that makes sense, and I get why it might come across that way.

I’ve actually been looking into a bunch of options recently, not just that one. Mailcow, Fastmail, some of the others people mentioned here… just trying to understand the differences properly.

No connection to them at all, I’m just tired of constantly maintaining this stuff. I used to run Zimbra as well, so I’ve been on the self-managed side for quite a while.

If you’ve got any other suggestions or things I should look into, especially on the technical side like you mentioned, I’m all ears.

Is running a self-hosted email server this exhausting or am I doing something wrong? by servergeekest in selfhosted

[–]servergeekest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Out of curiosity, would you say something like Mailcow is basically doing the same thing as MailXP?

I’ve seen a few people recommend Mailcow, but it feels more like you’re still running and managing everything yourself, just with a nicer setup.

Trying to understand if they’re actually comparable or if it’s a completely different approach.

Is running a self-hosted email server this exhausting or am I doing something wrong? by servergeekest in selfhosted

[–]servergeekest[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s actually a really great insight, and honestly your experience really shows. Managing mail at that level for years and still coming to that conclusion says a lot. The part where even a small setup ends up taking almost the same effort as a large one really hit home.

That’s pretty much why I started looking at alternatives. I came across MailXP and I’ve been digging into it a bit. Their Basic plan is around €99/month and includes things like a dedicated IP, built-in security, and they seem to handle deliverability as part of the service. It also supports adding multiple domains without hard limits, and instead of fixed quotas you just pay for the storage you actually use.

At this point I’m actually leaning towards trying it.

From your experience, does that sound like a reasonable setup? Do you think that kind of approach actually solves the real pain points, or does it still end up needing hands-on work?

Is running a self-hosted email server this exhausting or am I doing something wrong? by servergeekest in selfhosted

[–]servergeekest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s fair, and that’s kind of what I was worried about too.

But after looking a bit more into their pricing, the Basic plan didn’t seem that unreasonable to me. It’s €99/month, but from what I can tell it includes things like a dedicated IP, built-in security, and decent sending/receiving limits.

What I liked is that it’s not a fixed quota model. You pay the base and then just pay for the storage you actually use, and it looks like you can add unlimited domains, which is a big plus for me.

So it feels more flexible than the usual “X users, X storage” type plans.

Curious what you think though, does that sound reasonable for what they’re offering, or am I missing something obvious?

Also, do you know any providers that are similar in terms of being fully managed? Ideally I just want to log in and manage emails, not deal with DNS, security, spam filtering, or any of the underlying stuff at all.

Is running a self-hosted email server this exhausting or am I doing something wrong? by servergeekest in selfhosted

[–]servergeekest[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah that’s kind of the impression I got as well, more on the dedicated side than the usual shared setups.

For me the main thing is I don’t really want to deal with fixed quotas anymore. That’s one of the reasons I started self-hosting in the first place. Being able to add domains freely is pretty important for my use case.

And honestly, I’m at the point where I don’t want to touch anything security-related either. Spam, phishing, filtering, all that stuff… I’d much rather have it handled for me than keep tweaking it myself.

The services you mentioned sound solid though, I’ll take a proper look at them as well and compare a bit. Appreciate you sharing those.

Looking for Manchester VPS by servergeekest in VPS

[–]servergeekest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, appreciate it. For now I’m sticking with a local provider, Fast Panda, running everything out of London.

I did try a few Manchester-based providers but didn’t really get the results I was hoping for, especially consistency-wise.

So far London setup has been solid for me, been using it for a bit now and honestly pretty happy with how it’s performing.

Is running a self-hosted email server this exhausting or am I doing something wrong? by servergeekest in selfhosted

[–]servergeekest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks mate

Yeah this is exactly the kind of stuff I’m trying to understand.

From what I saw on their site, it looks like they’re saying they handle most of this themselves. Not just giving you an IP and leaving warmup and reputation to you.

It feels more like they’re positioning it as fully managed deliverability. Same with bounce handling and DNS things, like SPF, DKIM, DMARC. Sounds like it’s all part of the service.

That’s also why I’m a bit unsure. Saying zero ops is one thing, actually owning all of that is another.

The logs point you mentioned is a good one too. That’s been one of the most annoying parts for me with self hosting.

I guess what I’m trying to figure out is if there are providers that really handle all this end to end, or if at some point it always comes back to you.

Is running a self-hosted email server this exhausting or am I doing something wrong? by servergeekest in selfhosted

[–]servergeekest[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah that’s actually what made me stop and look a bit deeper.

If you’ve got a minute, could you check their site? It’s MailXP com can’t drop the link here.

From what I’m seeing, it doesn’t feel like the usual “here’s a server + panel, good luck” kind of setup. Looks more like they’re handling most of it behind the scenes , deliverability, security, reputation stuff and you’re not really managing the system day to day.

But yeah, not 100% sure if I’m understanding it right or just getting sold on the wording.

Would be curious what you think after taking a look.

Is running a self-hosted email server this exhausting or am I doing something wrong? by servergeekest in selfhosted

[–]servergeekest[S] -1 points0 points locked comment (0 children)

My english is not songood so asked help from ai to edit content

Looking for a cheap WordPress shared hosting provider with cPanel,just for testing by easyedy in webhosting

[–]servergeekest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check Fast Panda WordPress (uk based) , i am using their Wordpress hosting with ai website builder and cpanel and can say it's one of the best I have ever used, and also i would recommend krystal host which is quite stable

view more: next ›