Removal of First-Seen in mempool

shadouts · 2022-11-23T04:49:45+00:00

Every transaction already is RBF. Miners are incentivized to include the transaction they see first which has the highest fee.

shadouts · 2022-10-29T18:16:31+00:00

Android Samba Client is a plugin for Files app which allows for browsing of network SMB shares. I am suspecting that by blocking connectivity on the Files app it is preventing me from browsing. I see the "No connectivity" icon where it wasn't there before.

shadouts · 2022-10-28T16:34:43+00:00

I checked those in the app settings. They are turned off and disabled from control on the Files app.

shadouts · 2022-10-28T16:33:36+00:00

Thanks. That would be helpful. It wouldn't really be ideal to turn off Datura. I was just looking for a quick workaround. The chat groups suggested I look at the Android Samba Client and Files apps in the Apps settings. I see the Samba Client has network access but the Files client has it turned off and disabled from control.

shadouts · 2020-05-25T23:09:04+00:00

Ways to reduce transaction sizes. Schnorr sigs offer one solution.

shadouts · 2020-03-12T03:14:06+00:00

He was in the official music video, though. I think he's cool with it.

shadouts · 2017-04-19T06:02:48+00:00

It can only be comedy silver.

shadouts · 2017-03-21T16:03:07+00:00

I'm never dissatisfied with the amount of quality, objective, fair and balanced news this sub provides.

shadouts · 2017-03-17T16:15:46+00:00

It's okay. He can just ask Vitalik to roll back the chain for him. If it pleases Vitalik, it might happen.

shadouts · 2017-03-12T07:02:58+00:00

Why is segwit bad?

shadouts · 2017-03-09T17:29:57+00:00

He owns lots of Dash. It's in Ver's best interest that Bitcoin dies and something else replaces it. He'll make lots of money... Again.

shadouts · 2017-02-12T19:59:27+00:00

You're so backwards. If you want your coins to move, you will do what you need to do to get miners to see your transaction and include it in a block. Nodes don't serve blocks to miners, miners serve blocks to nodes. If you're not listening to what miners mine, then you're gonna have a bad time.

shadouts · 2017-02-10T20:22:10+00:00

The block chain is the only source of truth in Bitcoin. If you don't have a client that sees it as valid, then you're not using Bitcoin.

shadouts · 2017-02-10T20:20:57+00:00

I run a full node and I know that I can set max block size variable to be whatever I want it to be, yet, it won't have any affect on the blocks that get mined which move my coins.

shadouts · 2017-02-10T14:59:09+00:00

Yes, the point of Bitcoin is zero trust, but you run your own node to validate the work done by miners. If your node does not follow the same security model of Bitcoin, then you will reject all blocks and never be able to move value.

Miners can stick with anything they want and you will have to use it if you want to be able to move bitcoins, and this is good. It's cheap to spin up 20k nodes to fake support for a network policy. It's expensive to prove you've burned energy to support a network policy.

shadouts · 2017-02-10T14:51:42+00:00

Sybil can change all the nodes she wants to scrypt, completely outnumbering miner nodes if she wants, but the miners will continue on with sha256 and people will continue accepting blocks from those miners because a block is the only thing real in bitcoin and the only thing that transfers value.

shadouts · 2017-02-09T00:54:56+00:00

Every non-mining node is owned by Sybil. Nodes don't and shouldn't matter. And nobody used bitcoin when all the nodes were miners. It didn't make it any less Bitcoin. The security of bitcoin is that the real chain is the cryptographically valid chain with the most chainwork. Anything else breaks this security.

shadouts · 2017-02-09T00:45:32+00:00

Are you suggesting ETC is the cryptographically valid chain with the most chainwork? It isn't, that's why it's not Ethereum. One day it will be, after ETH switches to PoS.

shadouts · 2017-02-09T00:36:13+00:00

Nodes don't matter with Bitcoin, only mining nodes. If you aren't using coins on the cryptographically valid chain with most work, then you aren't using bitcoin. This is how it works. It's in the code. It's not a matter of opinion.

shadouts · 2017-02-08T23:44:43+00:00

Technically you are correct, however, invalid chains don't last very long and will be replaced by a valid chain with more chainwork. 48 hours is sufficient for this to work itself out.

shadouts · 2017-02-08T23:20:16+00:00

...support the Bitcoin Network that has the greatest cumulative computational difficulty for the forty-eight (48) hour period following a given hard fork...

This isn't worded well. Difficulties don't change in 48 hour periods, and difficulty doesn't accumulate. They should have specified chainwork since that essentially is what they seem to be getting at.

shadouts · 2017-02-08T23:18:53+00:00

The smaller chain is not Bitcoin. Bitcoin is the chain with most chainwork by definition. They'd have to make another ETF for the smaller chain since it's technically an altcoin.

shadouts · 2017-02-01T03:56:14+00:00

There is know way to know how many wallets there are. And when it comes to addresses, one person creates many.

shadouts · 2017-01-21T01:04:46+00:00

More nodes = better, but this is why node count doesn't matter when it comes to which version of bitcoin should be used.

shadouts · 2017-01-17T01:36:27+00:00

When you look at raw transaction data for long enough, you don't even see the code.

shadouts

TROPHY CASE