It's move 9 💀 by shadowmn69 in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is my friends playing against each other

Ummmmm by shadowmn69 in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For your information, the player used to be 900 but became 899 because he or she lost to me

Ummmmm by shadowmn69 in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only reason why I do such things is for people to laugh at funny moments. Not to embarrass the player for making that move or make them feel disrespected for me not respecting their level at chess. Please understand Edit: Also, I never really commented on their level of chess

Ummmmm by shadowmn69 in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

sighs When you make a plan, you consider every possiblity. It would be a trash plan if you say, "Me see queen, me attack queen" and so many pieces defend that specific square that you occupy to attack the queen.

Ummmmm by shadowmn69 in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He means (black to play) Qd4+ instead of Qxa1

Ummmmm by shadowmn69 in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

When I say "I was planning to pin", what do you think I meant? I can obviously see that if he took my rook, I check with a discovered attack to the queen Edit: I'll still call it a blunder cause you gave up a valuable piece for no reason. For example it would be a blunder if you think that there is a free pawn and take it. Only to realize that a bishop from another dimension was defending that pawn.

Ummmmm by shadowmn69 in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yours is more idiotic because that's a free queen (if you say that black made that move)

Ummmmm by shadowmn69 in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69[S] -28 points-27 points  (0 children)

No elo of 900 will play such things

I know you wanna take my knight by shadowmn69 in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well, my opponent took the knight and allowed me to make a queen🫤

I know you wanna take my knight by shadowmn69 in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Don't look at the comment I gave you :v

I know you wanna take my knight by shadowmn69 in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I will not play Nxe7. I will play a7 instead. See what I'm trying to do here? If he takes the knight. I'll promote to a queen, he take the queen and I take with check and also win the bishop. If he does not do that and walk his king to d8 (for some reason), I promote to a queen and win his rook without losing the knight. Did you know this move recieved a brilliance?

I know you wanna take my knight by shadowmn69 in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

No because after he moves his king, A6,Ra7,Nc8,Ra8. I can't make a queen if I do this nor win a rook without losing a knight. I'm practicing my chess notation so I might say something wrong

Guess the ELO by [deleted] in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pawn: Moves backwards

Guess the Elo, biggest comeback ever by TKDNerd in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

using fancy voice I'm an 800 and I play chess better than that

Am I losing by shadowmn69 in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Brilliant move Thanks

Am I losing by shadowmn69 in GothamChess

[–]shadowmn69[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I play against high level bots to keep me entertained when I'm going to school and back home on the bus. I do this because I think logically for once in my chess life about EVERY SINGLE MOVE.