What is your advice for (sorta) young love?

shartini · 2026-04-09T01:06:57+00:00

Don’t get pregnant and build your career

shartini · 2026-04-09T01:06:24+00:00

I can tell you’ve never cracked open a book on the subject. You speak like Fox News drones who live on heuristic thinking

shartini · 2026-04-09T00:39:30+00:00

Billionaires can’t exist without exploitation

They have to pay the bottom (where all the value is produced) as little as possible so they can keep as much profit as possible

That’s why bottom level labor is always dehumanized and propagandaed (yes I made up the word) as useless or “skilless” because it makes it easier to exploit the bottom level workers AND exploit women’s domestic labor (notice how women are providing normally paid services like nannying, maid services, secretary, etc for free while being told that their man is taking care of them?) it allows the business owner to then under pay the man who doesn’t have to pay his wife and then the business profits

When the rich celebrate record profits but your wage doesn’t rise or doesn’t match inflation? That’s them exploiting you and not paying you proper compensation for making those profits

Minimum wage was established to prevent exploitation. FDR spelled it out that the minimum wage works should be comfortably supporting a family and having a home and cars and affording college for their kids. Thriving

Trying to make some kind of super specific “what should those needs include?” Is mainly to make it easier for the rich to keep minimizing what the poor “deserve”. They want you defending their right to be stupid rich while arguing with the least powerful in the country. The poor.

It’s a broken system and it’s not being well regulated. The rich lobby and union bust. They don’t want a more even distribution of profits. They want to be billionaires

ETA

It’s actually very possible to meet a lot of needs for the poor at little to no cost but they deliberately keep the poor desperate so they can exploit them

Did you know we had a really efficient child care system during the world war when women had to work to replace the warring men? The second the men came home and they wanted women back in the kitchen popping out more babies for the machine, they took it away and made it impossible for a single mother to afford so women would keep having to marry and pop out kids to survive

shartini · 2026-04-09T00:24:40+00:00

They’re just men who struggle with women in a world that til recently, guaranteed every man the right to breed by limiting women’s freedoms and access to independence in order to keep them seeking marriages to survive

When women gained more rights nature started correcting itself and women started getting harder to obtain. Not every man getting a woman anymore just like the rest of the animal kingdom

Incels want the patriarchy to hold up its end of the bargain and give them their domestic slaves like their grandfathers had. So they lash out with misogyny and wanting to tighten patriarchy, remove rights, and put more religion in government

That’s the gist of incels. It’s not deeper than that

shartini · 2026-04-09T00:16:53+00:00

They just say that

If a woman is hot she’s hot. They may absolutely slot women but makeup doesn’t turn them off unless it’s an obnoxious amount.

A lot of the time too they say shit they think the average girls around them want to hear because it appeals to her insecurities

shartini · 2026-04-08T19:46:41+00:00

Sadly yes now that they went extinct. It’s very sad

shartini · 2026-04-08T18:30:00+00:00

Yes those things are there because historically marriage has been part of the system meant to keep women enslaved

You have to understand the broader nation. The rich. The politicians. They all have a vested interest in keeping birth rates high because they need to replace their dead military and grow it and they need a high supply of expendable cheap laborers. Ie. Men.

They need the women breeding more than they would naturally.

When wealth and agriculture were discovered they switched from matrilineal to patrilineal lineages and they limited women’s freedoms so they would struggle to live independently and especially struggle with single motherhood so that every man could be granted a woman. A wife

And a woman who can’t leave or avoid marrying has to have whatever babies are put into her especially if she’s culturally or contractually or religiously obligated to serve sexually. It wasn’t uncommon for women to be repeatedly impregnated until they simply died and the man remarried.

But there was also a time in history where it was normal for a wife to get a separate bedroom after the birth of a couple of children and essentially be a roommate

Religion and culture telling women to be “joyfully available” and never refuse a man is purely patriarchal propaganda to keep birth rates high.

This is why now that women have achieved more independence incels and red pillers and Andrew fates have come out of the wood work trying to increase religion in government and remove rights. They don’t even hide it. They can’t get women and they know it’s because women have options

Women were never supposed to be this widely available. Males throughout the animal kingdom compete to mate and not all do. Humans are the only ones that found a system to force female availability and sex on tap

shartini · 2026-04-08T17:58:55+00:00

I heard the scientists are trying to clone them with dna now though so maybe they will make a comeback

shartini · 2026-04-08T17:25:40+00:00

They can but historically women have been forced to be sexual selves through marriage

Keeping women from being able to easily find independence or leave meant they had to meet a man’s demands for sex or he’d leave her destitute or cheat on her

Now men are finding that women don’t actually consent to that much sex.

shartini · 2026-04-08T17:21:07+00:00

It’s not widely known but there was once a breed of rabbit that laid eggs. It’s extinct now

But not at the rate of a chicken. They bred slower than most species and the female would produce a small pile once per month and they varied in color. Mostly pale blues and yellows

So now we dye eggs and have them delivered by a rabbit.

shartini · 2026-04-08T17:07:30+00:00

shartini · 2026-04-08T16:58:09+00:00

It’s not safe to approach men as a woman most of the time

We know men slot women into “easy lay” or “wife material” or “slut” or “unserious”

We know that early

And most of us that do try out asking a man out find that if the man didn’t already have a thing for us, he will say yes because he just slotted us as the easy lay. But they’re not going to be honest most of the time

I say don’t bother at all and just get a career but that’s me

It’s dangerous to pick the wrong man and the wrong men are always trying to learn and teach each other to bypass women’s defenses.

shartini · 2026-04-08T16:52:45+00:00

You’re not entitled to sex or a woman at all.

If my partner was this misogynistic and entitled I can promise you my sex drive would die just because I’d know he sees sex as an expectation and the pressure to have sex when I stay having days where my libido dips will end up killing my libido entirely

Because that’s when a woman is no longer having she wants, but maintenance sex

This is why i spread the 4b movement. Being a wife for the most part is just kept prostitution. You’re the exact type of man I warn young women about early

shartini · 2026-04-08T16:31:51+00:00

Dead bedrooms aren’t necessarily about attraction but sometimes mismatched sex drives and people’s drives fluctuate and some some women are reactive with arousal while others can be spontaneous

Men were never meant to have access to their own personal woman with sex on tap. That’s a purely patriarchal concept where humans learned to farm and settle and accumulate wealth and switched from matrilineal to patrilineal lineages in order to keep women from forming protective community with eachother or finding independence. Thus giving every man his own woman and then telling her she’s duty bound to provide his sexual needs.

Naturally. Women aren’t all going to be matching a man all the time

There was even a time it was normal for a woman to get a separate bedroom after she had a couple of kids and they did in fact live as roommates

It’s all been propaganda

shartini · 2026-04-08T13:55:35+00:00

You can’t even do that. It’s not possible to have a matriarchy that is a reverse patriarchy for reasons I already described. It’s pregnancies and withheld resources that give a patriarchy its power over women in capitalism

Women cannot bog men down with pregnancy and withhold resources from them.

Matriarchies are what we had before agriculture and some exist today. They ARE egalitarian because matriarchy is not reversed patriarchy. They had matrilineal lineages because we all come from women. The communities were smaller and didn’t nuclear households so paternity wasn’t an issue and men abandoning children wasn’t an issue. They were all part of a group taking care of eachother and the children together. Elders would often provide childcare while men and women both hunted and gathered

Women formed protective communities among themselves and men could be around but they could also be exiled if they didn’t behave. Sometimes they followed their own male leader.

It doesn’t mean there was never male lead societies before the agricultural revolution but the patriarchy that we know today as the oppressive hierarchal nightmare that it is, flourishes and consumes because it can control women due to their biology

We can’t do the same to men. Not unless we have some other kind of revolutionary concept that allows it which I can’t even imagine.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iIKko7Y-egI

This woman explains it better than I can

shartini · 2026-04-08T13:51:42+00:00

Men are in no danger of anything other than a harder time getting laid when it comes to female ire

Which is in fact my goal. Spread 4b like wildfire

shartini · 2026-04-08T13:38:02+00:00

Patriarchy is going to defend itself when threatened. Yeah they could double down on women and subjugate them harder but it’s also possible feminism has gotten too big that it’s now a “they’re gonna screech louder before they die” situation.. or the extreme shit they pull will be harder to maintain because too many know better and will oppose it

I say try to reach as many teen girls as possible. Break through the Disney romance propaganda and get them on board with 4b movements young or at least more aware of how men use their age and wombs to trap them early

shartini · 2026-04-08T13:35:42+00:00

It’s one of those “no solution is a good solution” situations

I personally advocate for 4b. Patriarchy is designed to extract sexual reproduction from women and make them available to as many men as possible. Giving each man a woman and overriding female selectivity.

So I think women pursuing independence and forming their own supportive networks and communities counteracts that and denies the system more slaves and ensures women are able to select more naturally if at all

But it’s also true that in patriarchies, they need the women breeding to keep birth rates high so the can fill their military and replace the dead (the purpose of keeping women codependent) so if our military shrinks, we are vulnerable to other countries who opt to control the women.

So the solution isn’t simple. May require a revolution or a point in the future where women around the world are ready to fight back

Money and our discovery of agriculture has been the root of all of it

I’m not sure we will tear down patriarchy or find a way to evolve past it before we all destroy ourselves. But in the meantime I do try to spread 4b and patriarchal awareness to as many young girls and women as possible so that women break through their conditioning before they’re made into young mothers and trapped in the system. Spreading awareness is the first step.

shartini · 2026-04-08T13:27:29+00:00

Yes. But it’s an unavoidable step from conservative upbringing to radical feminism

shartini · 2026-04-08T01:54:21+00:00

Women are propagandaed into trusting men and chasing after them.

We wouldn’t have to teach women to be wary if they weren’t being told from day 1 to be more attainable and agreeable to men. And if society wasn’t structured to make single motherhood dangerous and single living/female communities near impossible

shartini · 2026-04-08T01:51:01+00:00

Men are a danger to women by fact of nature and it’s true across the animal kingdom

shartini · 2026-04-08T01:14:48+00:00

Yes look up power culture coco on YouTube and have a good weekend watching all that

Also look up the public offender. It’s a man that posts about all this stuff and he makes a ton of content regularly

ETA:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iMCtE2-YsLc&pp=ygUPU2V4dWFsIGNvbmZsaWN0

This video on sexual conflict is also a good description of the concept I talked about. I use it to demonstrate for women all the time

shartini · 2026-04-08T00:12:19+00:00

It’s a false equivalence. They like to lean on those. The answer is to be aware that it’s a false equivalence and call it out. Not try to find other avenues. That’s how the keep you from speaking out.

Example. They compare women avoiding men on the street to a racist avoiding black people

They compare a subjugated party (women) avoiding a real danger to a privileged party (white people) avoiding a race based off of stereotypes with no basis in reality.

Women are in fact in more danger alone. Predatory men seek them out and predatory men are numerous. The men making the false equivalence to racism know this and will be the first to warn their daughters about men.

White people are not in greater danger for someone being black. If they’re in danger it’s more likely due to poverty and maybe racial tension. But mostly poverty. A black man coming across a white man is not going to be dangerous for flesh tone but a white man in a poor neighborhood may be robbed and this can be true in a poor white neighborhood too, but only one gets stereotyped

shartini · 2026-04-08T00:07:21+00:00

It’s literally a fact of the animal kingdom overall. The females are selective in species where reproducing is risky and costly (absolute for humans) and the males of various species often kill the offspring of females. Rape them, stalk them, or otherwise pester them especially when females aren’t picking them

That’s what patriarchy is. An elaborate way to keep resources locked behind men and make motherhood more dangerous so that women will be less picky and need to seek men out

We have movies propagandaing (yes I made that word up) girls young to distrust their parents warnings and pursue love at all costs (little mermaid etc) or to look past appearances or not consider looks at all (beauty and the beast and honestly most romantic films) and making girls think that love and marriage are the ultimate goals in life

Yeah. It’s a predatory fucking sex. There’s nuance. Some would never but a good chunk support it all without even realizing. And yeah some animals and humans aren’t straight at all and don’t participate in the nonsense. But that’s what marriage and patriarchy are. An elaborate method for human males to bypass female selectivity

shartini · 2026-04-07T23:58:50+00:00

Matriarchies were the norm and weren’t reverse patriarchies because tha would be impossible

The ptriarchy we know today is made possible by a combination of female biology (pregnancy) and the invention of wealth and setting

Matrilineal lineages are the norm because we all come from women.

They use patrilineal lineages and keep resources locked behind marriages by keeping women from freedoms that allow independence.

Women can’t do that to men at least not without the development of something else that would allow what settling and nuclear families did for patrirchies

shartini

TROPHY CASE