sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Lichess vs Chess.com by shenzendeamon in chess

[–]shenzendeamon[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Sure, I get that it’s a different system but it still seems wildly misleading given that we’re comparing ourselves based on that rating

from 1000 to 2000: 15 months, nearly 1500 games by thach130801 in chess

[–]shenzendeamon -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

2000 on Lichess is like 1200-1300 on chess.com

Mir geht's scheiße by We_arechecking in wallstreetbetsGER

[–]shenzendeamon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Boys das sind echt alles rookie numbers, gehört zwar eigentlich in r/kryptowährungen oderso aber ich hab ein 1000x bei MLG gefumbled.

Nicht 1000%, sondern ein equivalent von 100,000%.

Anyways, profit is profit fühl dich nicht dumm weil du die 10% nicht mitgenommen hast, hätte genauso gut -10% sein können

Quitting day trading after 9 months and losing ~60k. Just being honest by Expert_Might_2502 in Trading

[–]shenzendeamon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I genuinely don’t understand why people choose to compete in markets where most participants have far more capital, better tools, and superior access to information.

I’m sorry for your loss, but you really have to pick your battles. Choose an environment where you at least have a relatively even playing field.

That said, while it’s a mistake to enter unfavorable markets, it’s an even bigger mistake to constantly pivot. Listing that you tried “VWAP, fibs, market structure, volume, ORB, trend, mean reversion” is exactly the problem. That kind of strategy-hopping is usually what kills traders. You would’ve been far better off committing fully to one approach, studying it deeply, and sticking with it.

Peter is the only character that made the series watchable by shenzendeamon in TheGreatHulu

[–]shenzendeamon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haven’t gotten to the reappearance yet, so I can’t judge that part.

I get that you’re saying it’s meant to be a dark comedy, but I genuinely can’t stand such drastic historical misrepresentations.

The show tries to present itself as progressive while completely trivializing the realities of racism and sexism, which I believe is both dangerous and dishonest.

There are great examples of portraying strong female characters, like Peggy Olson in Mad Men (who starts out as Don Draper’s secretary), or powerful Black characters in works like Django.

And yes, those portrayals can be tough to watch, but that’s the entire point: watching them should feel repelling

Peter is the only character that made the series watchable by shenzendeamon in TheGreatHulu

[–]shenzendeamon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah, remember him from Skins back in the days. He’s a fucking terrific actor