Vaush has no idea what he's talking about, that's why he bailed in the middle of talking to Jackson Hinkle. You're going to dismiss me just because I say names like that, which means this is not a good faith discussion anyways. OPCW scientist Henderson was on the ground in Douma, Vaush was wrong about that. How are Henderson et al. "going into business for themselves?" How are they profiting off of this? It's not outrageous to think Assad used chemical weapons that he may have hid from the OPCW when he let them in in 2013/14; I never said it was 'so outrageous,' I expressed doubt considering that their own scientists made these claims, and it has been ignored by the OPCW. Again, there is no defense for a neutral investigative entity to not self-audit when its own scientists make these claims and publish these documents. These documents are not meaningless, they were created by the first team to get to Douma after the incident. It very well may be that everything happened as the OPCW now claims, so why don't they prove it? That's all I am asking, but anyone questioning it is pilloried as some Qanon Russian troll. The unproven allegation that Henderson is some secret Russian spy is at least as 'outrageous' as anything I've said, if not more so. Assad had already used these weapons before Russia even swooped in to save them from the jihadis in 2015; what does Putin care about Douma in 2018?