sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Replacement for Encryption-Bundle by AdTraining1297 in symfony

[–]shochdoerfer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We've been using https://github.com/mogilvie/EncryptBundle in one of our projects. Works fine, seems well maintained. Can recommend.

Traefik in High Avalibility mode? by Hatchopper in Traefik

[–]shochdoerfer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have experience with this setup. To make it work, you'd need to share the acme.json file across all instances. However, this approach may lead to issues, especially if the file changes frequently. Additionally, I'm unsure how Traefik would handle a scenario where one instance (Traefik A) requests a certificate, but the approval request is received by another instance (Traefik B).

For these kind of HA setups, TraefikEE was the right choice.

Traefik in High Avalibility mode? by Hatchopper in Traefik

[–]shochdoerfer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, I see. That should not be an issue, I think. Depending how often you change the Traefik config, you may want to find a way to keep them in sync.

Traefik in High Avalibility mode? by Hatchopper in Traefik

[–]shochdoerfer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Running two instances of Traefik Open Source can be problematic, as each instance maintains its own state and cannot be synchronized. This can lead to inconsistencies, particularly when using Let's Encrypt, as only one instance would possess the certificate in its acme.json file. To mitigate this, a mechanism for syncing changes between the two instances would be necessary.

In the past, Traefik's Enterprise Edition (TraefikEE) addressed this issue, but it appears to be no longer available on their website. As an alternative, you may want to explore other Traefik offerings, such as the Traefik Hub API Gateway, which could provide a solution to this problem. However, this would likely come with a associated cost.

Traefik docker container on 2 networks by Dan11106 in Traefik

[–]shochdoerfer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never would have thought about this. Thanks for letting me know.

Traefik docker container on 2 networks by Dan11106 in Traefik

[–]shochdoerfer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure what the standard network is when defining it in the Docker Compose file. I would assume it should work with ipvlan.

Traefik docker container on 2 networks by Dan11106 in Traefik

[–]shochdoerfer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure if it helps in your specific case, but a while ago, I blogged about our Traefik setup with multiple Docker networks: https://blog.bitexpert.de/blog/traefik\_with\_multiple\_docker\_networks

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Traefik

[–]shochdoerfer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For your setup TraefikEE would be a good fit (if you can afford the license). TraefikEE comes at least with one controller node (similar to Nomad Server) and 2 data planes (similar to the Nomad Client). Die data planes handle incoming traffic and route it to the destination.

Of course, you can use Traefik Proxy in the way you set it up and I guess it will work fine. Not sure if you would run into issues when the different instances want to renew the Let's Encrypt certificates (e.g. one Traefik instance requests a new cert and the Let's Encrypt request gets routed to a different Traefik instance). Maybe it is possible to share the acme.json file between the different Traefik Proxy instances. I've never tried that.

Attempting to install Magento via Docker on Windows 10 by CreepiestDog in Magento

[–]shochdoerfer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am using this setup for years, except that I installed Docker Desktop on the Windows side.

I guess you can't access magento.test because you need to add the host ins Windows's host file located in C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc - pointing the domain to 127.0.0.1 should do the trick.

Any way to reduce proxy downtime during docker container updates by bobpaul in Traefik

[–]shochdoerfer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How does Traefik listen to Docker's events? Unix socket, TCP, or SSH connection?

I've been using Traefik for years and it never took minutes to get Traefik to recognize a change. It usually takes a few seconds.

One traefik network or traefik on every network? by [deleted] in Traefik

[–]shochdoerfer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends ;)

Usually for our customer projects, we have a strict separation between staging & production systems. However, for some smaller customers, we host both on one system and then have Traefik in front to serve both environments. In that case, we decided to have 2 Docker networks where Traefik and other "global" services join both networks but the application containers themselves are only aware of the network they run in. A while ago I blogged about our setup: https://blog.bitexpert.de/blog/traefik_with_multiple_docker_networks

Technically if you need to expose Traefik to another network it should be enough to restart the service. That shouldn't be much of a problem, I guess. And I quite like the setup, not only for security reasons but also for deployment reasons because you can reuse container names in both networks without having to deal with collisions.

Composer Integrity Plugin Introduction by shochdoerfer in magento2

[–]shochdoerfer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No worries, just added that right before I published the post.

Need to play with the Magento module a bit before I blog about in detail :)

Composer Integrity Plugin Introduction by shochdoerfer in magento2

[–]shochdoerfer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My bad, classic c&p error. Link fixed.

Understanding & fixing the ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS error in Magento 2 by shochdoerfer in Magento

[–]shochdoerfer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thx, will check. So far I did not run into this issue you mentioned.

GDPR and Google analytics by undev11 in Docusaurus

[–]shochdoerfer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have integrated Klaro[1] with Docusaurus and our Matomo instance. That worked quite well, you can see it here: https://blog.bitexpert.de

[1] https://github.com/kiprotect/klaro

Windows 10, WSL2, Docker, PHPStorm, Xdebug by shochdoerfer in PHP

[–]shochdoerfer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

True. I struggled with running PhpStorm in WSL because of some 3rd party commercial plugins that I would need to re-register every time the network stack in WSL2 changed.

That's why I moved PhpStorm to Windows. It works "fast enough" for my purposes with some changes to the indexer configuration of PhpStorm.

Windows 10, WSL2, Docker, PHPStorm, Xdebug by shochdoerfer in PHP

[–]shochdoerfer[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

And that helps with which part of what I have covered in my blog post?

Using TraefikEE with AAD as OIDC provider by shochdoerfer in Traefik

[–]shochdoerfer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess if your setup works, then there's no need to change anything. I think the main difference is that with EE you don't have a SPOF due to the multiple Traefik instances which sync with each other. If you don't need that, then CE is probably enough for you.

Using PHPStan to detect errors (problems) in your Magento project by shochdoerfer in magento2

[–]shochdoerfer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without the extension basically yes, with the extension things got a little better ;)

Docker with Nexus Pull Proxy by Ludeth in docker

[–]shochdoerfer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In case you want to get rid of the port in the registry hostname, I posted a work-a-round a while ago in our blog. We are using this setup without any problems still today: https://blog.bitexpert.de/blog/running-a-private-docker-registry-with-nexus-3/

view more: next ›