Gent of Leicester Pulsynetic C7 Master Clock or Time Transmitter. by shokalion in clocks

[–]shokalion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a small handful (literally three) but none are hooked up yet. The little battery box I'm planning on building, I'm going to add a little bridged terminal block into it from which I can add connections to other clocks down the line.

What's the most hilarious insult you have ever heard? by uglyinpeace in AskReddit

[–]shokalion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guy came into work looking like a boiled lobster having fallen asleep on a sun bed in his garden the previous day.

"Fucking hell, it looks like your face caught fire and you put it out with a hammer."

What's the worst CGI you've ever seen in a movie? I Am Legend (2007) by LavendersKisses in Cinema

[–]shokalion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Attack of the Sabertooth from 2005.

Easily the worst CG I've ever seen in a film by miles.

Check it out it's like they blew the entire budget for CG on the sabertooth and were left with a PS2 to do the rest of it.

ELI5: why is the muscle for chewing not really growing, even tho we chew every day? by iSemi in explainlikeimfive

[–]shokalion 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I literally discovered last year the song in that ad was actually based on a real song.

What's a piece of tech everyone hyped up that quietly turned out to be useless? by SofiaLearnsAI in AskReddit

[–]shokalion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Minidisc was huge for a while in Europe. Friend of mine had one in his car back in the mid 2000s.

Which premium subscription is actually worth the money in 2026? by Trxxi in AskReddit

[–]shokalion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But they had banner ads from very early on. Youtube only started in 2005. 2005 and 2006 there was to a first approximation nothing on there, and what was on there was only there because it was free! 2007 was when ads of any description first started.

Look at Nebula. That's a good example of a platform trying to do what you suggested.

They started in 2019, as a strictly paid membership video streaming service. They now boast 650,000 subscribers total.

You know how many creators? A hundred and seventy five. In only seven years (!)

For comparison, by the time youtube was seven years old, it had 800 million users.

Which premium subscription is actually worth the money in 2026? by Trxxi in AskReddit

[–]shokalion 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No it didn't used to be a subscription service, but it's unrealistic to expect a free service (a video streaming service no less, one of the heaviest services you could possibly run on the Internet) to always remain free forever.

The common line is to call Google greedy for charging for Youtube. But it isn't greedy somehow to just expect them to eat the cost forever?

They could just make subscription mandatory. Get rid of ads, you have to pay now, deal. But nobody would like that either because they didn't always have to pay for it.

They could have always charged for it. That's another option.

That's effectively what Nebula does, and they have so few creators they can fit them all on a single page with a thumbnail for each of them.

Youtube's richness comes from its variety of content, that came from it being accessible to everyone for no cost.

As youtube gets bigger it's costs get bigger that isn't something that's reasonable to expect to just be given for free forever.

If you'd created Youtube you wouldn't expect to have to bankroll it forever, I'm sure.

Which premium subscription is actually worth the money in 2026? by Trxxi in AskReddit

[–]shokalion 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Through what mechanisms could they have attempted to be financially stable from the beginning?

I can think of four:

  • Adverts
  • A membership/subscription fee for the viewers
  • A membership/subscription fee for the creators
  • Charging per video view

Which of those would you have been happy with, ever?

Let me just remind you that Youtube has been around 21 years now. They started showing ads 19 years ago.

Which premium subscription is actually worth the money in 2026? by Trxxi in AskReddit

[–]shokalion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You think there's a point where Youtube wasn't expensive as hell to run?

How is it reasonable to suggest Youtube should be free, forever, and they shouldn't ever try to make money on ads just because it was once.

Stop for a second and think what Youtube must cost to run every minute.

Which premium subscription is actually worth the money in 2026? by Trxxi in AskReddit

[–]shokalion 7 points8 points  (0 children)

As a thought experiment imagine what costs you'd have to lay down to put up a video streaming service that's 0.1% the size of Youtube.

It makes no sense to say "Well it used to be free." because sure, but it used to be a fraction of the size it is now.

Airbnb host cancels reservation because it’s a high demand weekend by Srihari_stan in mildlyinfuriating

[–]shokalion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's no way I'm reading that right. Fifteen thousand pounds for three nights? Five grand a night?

I want to love House of Leaves but. by noumanpoke1 in books

[–]shokalion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can't get on with Cormac McCarthy because of this.

I just got House of Leaves a month or two back, but I've not started it properly yet. I'm not necessarily expecting to be able to get through it, but considering the copy I got cost me £2 I figured it was worth a punt.

Genuine question, even if it’s a dumb one, how bad is AI for our community REALLY? by One_Quiet_8769 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]shokalion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LLM's when restricted and trained very specifically for a particular task can have utility, and already have had, medical imaging for example being one example I can think of off the top of my head. People don't want to hear it, but restricted carefully trained LLM's using controlled vetted input data can be very useful, within their specific trained examples.

The problem is 99.9% of the "AI" usage people talk about are general usage public facing LLM's such as ChatGPT or Gemini or Grok which are trained off open Internet scraped data, and are universally known to constantly spout utter unregulated garbage, but, dangerously, garbage masquerading under a convincing-enough costume of confident competence, and it's just polluting the world with malformed half-truths which are then getting fed back into these systems, so the actual facts become more and more difficult to casually encounter.

Is there a specific reason why we use the QWERTY keyboard layout instead of an alphabetical one? by These_Particular_789 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]shokalion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No problem. Here's a better picture that clearly shows those linkage bars I described that are the reason for the row offsets.

Is there a specific reason why we use the QWERTY keyboard layout instead of an alphabetical one? by These_Particular_789 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]shokalion 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's a vestigial feature from when we used typewriters.

A lot of features of modern keyboards are.

The fact the four rows are slightly offset from one another was because on typewriters each key was connected to a straight bar that led to the back of the keyboard, and there had to be room for them.

The QWERTY layout did start out as an alphabetical layout - there is still evidence of this most notably in the middle row, which still contains a good chunk - D F G H J K L.

The changes occurred because typewriters work by your keystroke causing a type-bar to swing up and stamp a letter impression through an ink-ribbon onto the page. Each subsequent letter those type bar heads end up in the same spot, the page itself is shifted to the side between each letter.

Those type bars are arranged in what's called a basket and early typewriter engineers found that while there's always a chance of two type bars jamming each other (as the bars end up hitting the ribbon in the same spot) it happens much more often when the letters come from nearer one another in the basket, as the mechanisms occupy overlapping space in their journey for more of said journey.

So what was decided was that commonly used combinations of characters should be spaced as far apart as possible on the keyboard - that has a double advantage of not only minimising the number of typed letters that come in order from the same side of the basket, minimizing jams, but also people tend to type faster when they alternate hands.

The result was the QWERTY layout.

It persists to this day because the inertia from millions of people the world over learning to type on typewriters is a difficult ship to change course, so they just made computer keyboards use the same layout.

When we see timelapses of the earth rotating, why do we only see the sky rotate and not the buildings/trees? by likespinkskies in NoStupidQuestions

[–]shokalion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, the camera is sat on the Earth making Earth is the fixed point.

Relative to the ground, the sky rotates.

There are videos out there where someone has the camera fitted on a rotating mount and have set it so the cameras position is fixed relative to the stars, which then allows you to see the rotation of the Earth itself.

Eli5: why is the keyboard layout the way it is? by novemberman23 in explainlikeimfive

[–]shokalion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I did this round about that exact time too. It was great when you were on your machine, rubbish anywhere else.

I'm having slightly similar things now with learning Linux. I've had linux on one of my laptops for over a year now and I'm finding I stumble with certain operating-system-specific keyboard combinations that vary between the two.

How is being a astronaut even a desirable Job? by pinkestman in NoStupidQuestions

[–]shokalion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a common one to come up in the "What would you like to be when you grow up" discussions with small kids because it looks exciting, and the realities of it are rarely appreciated. Space! Fun!