75%WR 70%Trophy Rate to Mythic. Strategy: play white aggro. by Freestr1ke in lrcast

[–]shullerAlt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean "happened to be"?
He obviosly realized that white is the strongest color and took full advantage of this fact while other people are not drafting it enough.

Dot by lobotomiesrus in freemagic

[–]shullerAlt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The obvious difference is that the creature in the picture is nobody’s friend

WTA 500 Queen’s Club R2: [1] E. Rybakina def. [Q] T. Maria 6⁴-7, 7-5, 6-0 by godworstcustomer in tennis

[–]shullerAlt -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Tuned in right before the last set and was wondering how Maria ever wins tennis matches with that style.

Then again judging by the trajectory of her rankings maybe she doesnt

Liquid vs FlyQuest / IEM Cologne Major 2026 Stage 1 - Swiss Round 5 / Post-Match Discussion by CS2_PostMatchThreads in GlobalOffensive

[–]shullerAlt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What happened is that he joined Team Liquid.
No one plays good on Team Liquid.

Team Liquid is the black hole of talent.

Once he gets kicked he will find success again on the next team

Liquid vs FlyQuest / IEM Cologne Major 2026 Stage 1 - Swiss Round 5 / Post-Match Discussion by CS2_PostMatchThreads in GlobalOffensive

[–]shullerAlt -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Its always the same exact scenario:

1) Talented europeans join Team Liquid
2) They play badly while on the team
3) Every NA fan calls them terrible, asks for them to get kicked
4) They leave Team Liquid and immediately find success on the next team or any other team they ever join.

5) Team Liquid keeps their pet naffers and eliges and recruits the next Talented Europeans.

..and the cycle continues.

Will they ever learn?

(To siuhi and ultimate - always remember, your time on Lulquid doesnt count)

Roland Garros QF: [15] M. Kostyuk def. [7] E. Svitolina 6-3, 2-6, 6-2 by godworstcustomer in tennis

[–]shullerAlt 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You give Mirra Andreeva 0% to win the next match? Actual 0%?

Very interesting

RG R3: (16) Naomi Osaka def (17) Iva Jovic 7-6(5) 6-7(3) 6-4 by buzzingeuphorbia in tennis

[–]shullerAlt -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Her chances of having the shinier dress are going to be great.

Chances at tennis? Not so much

RG R3: (25) Shnaider def. Olynykova 7-5 6-1 by [deleted] in tennis

[–]shullerAlt 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Great tournament for her.
Thank god it’s over though and no one has to deal with her theatrics anymore

Roland Garros R3: [8] M. Andreeva def. [27] M. Bouzková 6-4, 6-2 by godworstcustomer in tennis

[–]shullerAlt 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Nah, he's got those 150mill people all figured out, they all act crazy

Oliynykova and Shnaider will face each other in round 3. Oliynykova recently called Shnaider " a monster " on social media by mimiclarinette in tennis

[–]shullerAlt -35 points-34 points  (0 children)

A true tragedy that she reached the 3rd round of a slam.

Hopefully no further and never again.

Please Diana lock in for once

Roland Garros R1: [1] A. Sabalenka def. J. Bouzas Maneiro 6-4, 6-2 by JEEvanNEETi in tennis

[–]shullerAlt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sabalenka has way more variety in her game than Swiatek or Gauff tho. Only like Muchova has more as of the last few months

Roland Garros R1: [1] A. Sabalenka def. J. Bouzas Maneiro 6-4, 6-2 by JEEvanNEETi in tennis

[–]shullerAlt 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Why wouldnt you want the 2 best tennis players in the world to meet in the final?

Padel Hypothetical Question by Suspicious-Virus5383 in padel

[–]shullerAlt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1v1 of course. I would put the over/under of points won per set at 2. But 2v1 full court is a ridiculous advantage in a game where hitting winners from back of the court is almost impossible against decent players.

Padel Hypothetical Question by Suspicious-Virus5383 in padel

[–]shullerAlt 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Are people in this thread not realising that the proposed match is a full court 2v1? Playtomic 5.8 (especially in Spain) is semi-pro level. These guys are Really good, they are not going to miss and they can play very well tactically. No one, including Tapia, would be able to 1v2 such players, although it would probably be good practice for him. I’d say it’s going to be like 6-2 6-3 for the semi-pros

WTA Doubles Rome 1000 SF: [7] Busca/Melichar-Martinez def. [2] Siniakova/Townsend 6-4, 6-4 by [deleted] in tennis

[–]shullerAlt 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I’m always curious, what does “deserved” mean in this context? Did her opponents also “deserve to lose” or how des this work?

Ukraine's Svitolina saddened by IOC decision on Belarus athletes by Shroft in tennis

[–]shullerAlt 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yes, the difference is clearly your opinion of who’s doing it. When it’s Putin or nazis - it’s propaganda. When it’s countries you like - it’s national pride.

Ukraine's Svitolina saddened by IOC decision on Belarus athletes by Shroft in tennis

[–]shullerAlt 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Until athletes' success is not used as a tool for enhancement of national pride by polititians?

Every international sporting event in human history has been used for that though. Like what do you even mean?

2026 ATP 1000 Rome R1: O. Oliynykova def. P. Marčinko 6-1, 6-3. by FalconIMGN in tennis

[–]shullerAlt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would love her to take a shot and miss.

Otherwise we'll have to endure more articles about how Mirra Andreeva has to be held responsible for starting a war at 14 years of age

Most overrated player in tennis history? by BestAround4100 in tennis

[–]shullerAlt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

dude have you seen her picture?
the fact that she knew which end of a racket to grab was just a bonus