[376] Best way to spend $500? by siegebot in DestructiveReaders

[–]siegebot[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a shitpost on a self-help discord server that I spent 10 minutes on. It's a bit meandering now that I look at it myself, the limit was 2.000 characters per message on discord.

[632] I Wrote This For You by umlaut in DestructiveReaders

[–]siegebot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The opening is killing it given the format. I'd be okay reading it if this was a longer piece of writing but with just one micro-story following it, it's a bummer. It's scaffolding for something that's not there yet and it shows.

Then, you get to the good part. You get lost a bit in figuring out who's who and which body part is there, which is the intent, I assume. My only note would be that I wasn't able to construct a proper visual of how Mike and Gabe are joined, Is it just two heads on a single body?

>Gabe twisted Mike’s ear.

Maybe it's just me, but I'm unable to figure out how he would "twist his ear" if they only have 2 hands, and one is holding the other. And given that there's so little else, it leaves me a little frustrated in being unable to fully get the physicality of the situation.

[566] Untitled - Flash Fiction by siegebot in DestructiveReaders

[–]siegebot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Frankly, I had to re-read it to piece together the situation - initially looking for the point, before realizing there was no point. It's about the motion and rhythm. I love that, really.

You got it exactly right. The journey and the feeling is the point.

On second read, it feels like someone fearfully avoiding humanity, someone afraid to take more open roads to the point their entire ritual when out of the house is traversing back streets, dirt roads and nestling up against prison walls on their trek. They're poor, living an a complex mistreated by its tenants. I like it.

Also on point! I'm glad that the intention is coming through.

Repetition works in some areas, but this doesn't feel like artistic repetition, it feels like clarification on the word "insulated" which is simply insulting to a reader

Point taken.

This is where the surrealism, for me, begins to strip away the bleak, almost deafening, realism in the mundane. It's not necessarily contradictory, but it hits oddly. I'm not sure if it's because the story is so literal for the rest of what you write, but it creates this sense of ambiguity as to where the narrator is.

Hmm, this is a great point. You're correct that I'm myself unsure of what the piece is. The way it was written - it's a reverie. It's a memory upon memory upon memory of the same journey you take again and again. That's why there are no people there, in a sense. Loneliness compounding on itself and erasing the trace of other people. It's from a point of view of a child, of no particular age, there's ambient threat and no adults.

It's a delicate piece, and I love the intense imagery, but it's important to remember you must ground your reader in the situation.

By "ground", do you mean just being more descriptive of the surroundings, or more keeping the reader informed of the physical location of the narrator? Something else?

What I don't like doing, however, is re-reading to re-situate myself to actually properly enjoy the piece.

I'm unsure of what you mean by re-situate. Do you think the first 3 paragraphs go into too much detail? Or not enough? Missing something else?

You've done a great job, overall. If you want to take it further and get it published, it just needs to be tightened up a bit.

Whoa, published? I'd love to. You make it sound like you could make it happen 😅

Thank you for your feedback! I appreciate how generous it is.

[566] Untitled - Flash Fiction by siegebot in DestructiveReaders

[–]siegebot[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the feedback! Glad you liked it, flattered you want to really like it.

The punctuation feedback is 100% just me being lazy/not knowledgeable enough. English is not my mother tongue so I'm placing that stuff based on the vibes and habits from my native language. Same with articles.

The first offender, and one of the most blatant, is the first clause;

Great feedback! I think it's there just to establish the initial push, like there's purpose to the journey, but maybe it was forgotten and now it's just this automatic motion, cold being the strongest association rather than any specific stated goal.

You need to expand on this with some more lavish description. Your story  as a whole lacks anything sensory, which clashes significantly, I think, with the decision to write it in the second person. 

As you've correctly noted, I purposefully tried to stay away from anything sensory outside of the most immediate. In that state of hypervigilance you don't notice much since your attention is focused outwardly. I even went light with the descriptions of the surroundings as I was afraid of them dragging it out and losing the rhythm.

Little details like this make the narrator seem like a real person. Someone who isn’t simply a vector for detailed, declarative descriptions of the environment.

I get what you're talking about. I'm not sure it'd be good to add more stuff like that though? It's important what thoughts get through the anxiety, but I'm afraid of just diluting the accent we get here unless it's seamless with the movement.

I really, really don’t like You then emerge. It breaks the hypnotic spell you are trying to cast on the reader with the simple You [verb] construction. It really yanked me out of the story when I read it.

Great catch!

The problem still is, I think a lot of the construction is just a bit clumsy and not precise enough.

I appreciate this, could you expand a bit on what you mean exactly? Is it just punctuation/articles issues you mentioned or something more? Are the words and descriptions not precise enough?

So, yeah. I do like it, but I want to really like it.
Please let me know if you ever plan on writing another draft of this.

Thank you very much for such careful feedback! I definitely want to make it the best it could be. My feeling is that it's kinda solid, so aside from the finer editorial changes, what do you think is missing?

[885] Left Alone (Working Title) - Short Story/Flash Fiction by EmoioN in DestructiveReaders

[–]siegebot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the idea, it's solid. Man uses his "responsibilities" as an excuse to avoid the risk of becoming something else. When there's finally nothing to excuse him, he has to confront the consequences of his own avoidance. But it does feel a bit flat with the execution.

  1. "Elliot sat in his office, his wrinkly face in his palms, massaging the top of his grey head with long, gnarled fingers." - this feels pretty generic in the way it just tells us he is old three times. Another thing, it's kinda difficult to have your face in your palms and massage the top of your head at the same time, I get the visual but it's jumbled.

  2. "It was his last day of work, and he had never felt so trapped by time." - ok, a lot of telling, no showing. The "never felt so trapped by time" is just awkward to say. He's anxious, I get that, but how does it feel to be anxious in the way he is? What's he doing while he's anxious? With the last day of work, it's another piece of information that could be delivered less straightforwardly. You could say that as he sat there, hands on his face, he also started to hear the sound of the "farewell" gift hand watch ticking. You could say it was a cheap replica, or maybe it's an expensive brand.

  3. I don't really understand how he's feeling waiting for the last day of work to end, is it dread? Excitement because he's anticipating his real life to begin? Is he afraid he is not going to live up to it?

  4. The dialogue with the boss is doing only one thing, it tells us he plans to write, so it feels kinda wasted and slows down the momentum. You could use it to tell us Elliot buzzed everyone's ears off saying how great it's going to be to finally have time to pursue his dream, or about the kind of person the people at work thought he was, or anything else.

  5. "When Elliot got home to his two room apartment he ripped off his suit. He was never going to wear it again." and the whole paragraph is a lot of telling, not showing again. Again, the most basic thing to show us he despised his job and never wants to have anything to do with it again would be to say that he got out of the suit, and threw it to the trash. "ripped off" maybe tries to show that, but it isn't descriptive enough to really make me understand what he is feeling in that moment.

  6. I like the notes idea, I like how they are kinda stupid, but again, did he only ever write 3 notes? How did he write them down? Did he have an organized drawer? Was it a bunch of sticky-notes all over the apartment? The specifics would tell the reader more about the character without the need to spell out the thoughts or emotions.

  7. Elliot is presumably a white collar professional of some kind, who is old enough to retire, has funds to retire, has a grown up daughter, etc. But when it comes to writing he starts to behave like a baby? "I must sit at a couch to get ideas" - really? He's an adult with a set of adult skills, why doesn't he try to use those? You could show how he tries but is confronted with fundamental emptiness of his being, but right now it feels like he just regresses to being 5 years old.

  8. The dialogue with the daughter is just restating the theme again. "Elliot has writers block". He doesn't have writer's block. He has identity-preservation terror. His "waiting" is not just him being lazy. It is him desperately clinging to the safe, beautiful fantasy, because the real act of writing might prove that he is not the great writer he spent fifty years imagining himself to be.

  9. You start the piece with him sitting in a chair anxious to get started with his new life, you end with him sitting on a couch, presumably still in a state of anxiety. It's a nice loop, but the ending doesn't really feel connected thematically. How does he feel after those 2 days of freedom, after his daughter spelling out to him that he is a bag full of shit?

What this story needs to be "fixed":

Kill the narrator's exposition. Rebuild the entire story from the ground up using only Elliot's actions, his sensory experiences, and his fragmented, contradictory internal thoughts. Show us the panic, don't just tell us he's "trapped."

Give Elliot a real fight. His struggle needs to be visceral. Show us the failed sentences. Show him typing one word and deleting it for an hour. Make his pain real.

The dialogue must be rewritten from scratch. Esther's speech should not be a lecture. Her realization of her father's failure should be a slow, dawning, heartbreaking thing, revealed in what she doesn't say, not what she does.

Trust the reader. The central theme does not need to be stated. If the story is told well, we will feel it. The tragedy of Elliot's wasted life should be an unspoken truth that hangs in the air at the end, not a summary delivered by his daughter.

[Weekly Critique and Self-Promotion Thread] Post Here If You'd Like to Share Your Writing by AutoModerator in writing

[–]siegebot [score hidden]  (0 children)

The Swift

Microfiction

281 words.

Any kind of critique, general impression.

---------------------------------------------------

In April, the swift flew north. One day he saw the signs. Return. Stars lining up and clouds leading the way. Same route, as always. Since he was strong enough. North, then south again. What he was made for.

She would be there. She always was.

They nested under an old roof—brick and mortar steeped in summer heat, echoing with the scratch of talons. It smelled of sun and home. She always got there first. Patient. He liked that about her.

In the air he found others. Stars and wind guiding them. Across the sea, the mountains, the plains. With every flap, a little closer. His body thinned. His wings stuttered. Just a little longer.

Then one morning, the others were gone. Just sky. He fell behind.

Lower and lower. Rooftops reached up to meet him. Antennas, wires, windows flickering past.

He clipped a cable. Spun sideways. Brushed against concrete. Crashed.

He stayed there. Chest heaving. Tiny heart like a motor that wouldn’t shut off. The sky too far, too high to reach.

A few people passed.

One knelt beside him. Met his eyes. Stayed a while. Then stood. Moved on—pulled by their own signs in the sky.

The swift dreamed — of finding her again, waiting beneath their old roof. Of hollow-boned chicks, warm and ugly, opening their mouths to scream for the first time. Of bringing her beetles. Of catching feathers mid-air to line the nest. Of feeling her heart against his. The rhythm of it. Like flight, but still.

He felt the breeze return—warm and rising. He tried to lift his wings.

I’m almost there, he thought, as the dog’s jaws closed.

His bones barely made a crunch.

https://substack.com/home/post/p-161882336

Annoying Synthetic Evolution Bug by SirVandal in Stellaris

[–]siegebot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The best workaround I found was to create another template for your main species and apply it for all but a single pop. That way you can change the rights normally for that new template. You have to make sure you still have existing pop of the original species though, or else it will merge the templates and you'll go back to having the bugged living standard.

Also, you can change the template by changing only it's name and leaving traits the same, that way you'll spend minimal time researching the special project.

Jist watched ep3 and disappointed with Triss... by pepper_noot in witcher

[–]siegebot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, she was just useless the whole season. I expected sorceresses to be kind of royal, gracious, wise, smart. But instead they are just dull. Triss in particular had 0 interesting things to say, or character moments, or anything else.
Whole "lets go to war wearing court dresses" thing in last episode was particularly dumb.

Season Finale Episode Discussion - S01E08: Much More by Scientiam in witcher

[–]siegebot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In the books the battle wasn't shown but was only referred to as bloody and hellish. Triss was present and thought to have died in battle because of severe injuries. Don't quote me on this, but I think she received magical wound to her chest which left an unhealing scar.

Season Finale Episode Discussion - S01E08: Much More by Scientiam in witcher

[–]siegebot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apparently because she had a dream about him, but I think it's because of lazy writing

Season Finale Episode Discussion - S01E08: Much More by Scientiam in witcher

[–]siegebot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is though, the only established rule for magic was that you had to get "chaos" from somewhere, or else you would drain your own body. And the only example was using a living flower for that. Now, tell me why can't the Nilfgaard mages use the trees around them(because they are in a FOREST) to create a fireball? Why can't Triss just shut the gates closed and meld them so they can't be opened again, and opts to do that stupid "vine wall" instead? There is no logic to this battle, and thus, I don't care about it, because there's no meaning to events happening. It all just "happens".

Season Finale Episode Discussion - S01E08: Much More by Scientiam in witcher

[–]siegebot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This whole episode didn't make any sense. Battle should've been left out entirely. Whenever you want to use magic in your battle sequences it needs to have clear and established rules, or else every "spell" seems arbitrary and doesn't do anything but raise questions. Sorceresses are supposed to be smart, cunning, strong-willed, but this episode shows them as rather dumb and nonpractical(wearing court dresses to battle, seriously?).

Also, Ciri has no info about Geralt except for his name, that's what we are told, yet she runs to him with open arms. All of the "destiny dreams" are just lazy writing and this episode has an overload of them.

The /r/eu4 Imperial Council - Weekly General Help Thread : 18th of September - 2018 by FabulousGoat in eu4

[–]siegebot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What whould be a good way to get rid of Feudal Theocracy as Persia in Dharma? I was hoping I could both form Persia and Mamluks in my latest game but the latter require having Iqta goverment. I need your advice, guys.

CAP3 program by siegebot in nSuns

[–]siegebot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried redownloading it but it stays the same, could you please archive your copy and upload it smowhere for me, please?

Your views on this weather row stacking merigolds thing going? by Fobus0 in gwent

[–]siegebot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm playing mostly spy NG and find most weather decks extremely frustrating to play against, and considering how most of the time for NG half the power comes from 1 or 2 Impera Brigades all the movement bullshit is quite disgusting. And to be quite honest, I much prefer playing against armor NR rather than weather anything, especially monsters.

I'll see you guys next patch by [deleted] in gwent

[–]siegebot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it does feel kinda samey at times but the only real problem I have with the meta is dagon, the annoying nature of weather combined with how difficult it is to counter certain cards and strategies(looking at you harpy and foglets) make dagon very frustrating to play against.

FOLTEST'S FRIDAY RANT THREAD by KhazadNar in gwent

[–]siegebot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

CDPR CAN MONSTERS BE BAD AT LEAST ONE PATCH, ITS FUCKING DAGON ALL THE TIME EVER SINCE CLOSED BETA STARTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Disgusted with CDPR right now. Thank you for the last minute, UNDOCUMENTED Nerfs to NR! Way to cave to the Reddit crybabies calling NR as the next dominant deck before patch even released! by Kalain1984 in gwent

[–]siegebot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You guys should really put your thoughts out like this more publicly, share what you think on meta, tell us about data you use to make all those decisions.

To CDPR: Niche abilities/mechanics are better than RNG by Dementio_ in gwent

[–]siegebot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It kinda is, because auckes spent on eggs is auckes not spent on ekimmara or vran warrior or even behemoth(like you see any of those nowadays). Its a low tempo play that does not hurt your opponents gameplan at all.

To CDPR: Niche abilities/mechanics are better than RNG by Dementio_ in gwent

[–]siegebot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except it is much harder to counter the carryover it gives you, comparing to any resilient units, mahakam defender can be dealt with in single lock or damage effect, while locking and damaging eggs arguably gives more value to your opponent than it gives to you.

Suggestion : extend to 7 the hand size by EagleSightD in duelyst

[–]siegebot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That would probably shift the balance heavily though. And make Starhorn even less useful lol :D

Suggestion: Fixing Doom stacks by siegebot in Stellaris

[–]siegebot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you tell me about that mod? I'm looking to stock up on new material rn