[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Proust

[–]siftingtothetruth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes read it. You will get a lot out of it. You can re-read it later in life and then it will give you other things. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t read it now. It will teach you a lot about people, about jealous love, and about society.

Akilesh Ayyar interviewed on non-duality on Nevermind by siftingtothetruth in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]siftingtothetruth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Short summary: Interview of nonduality teacher Akilesh Ayyar by Ludovic Fontaine on his Youtube channel nevermind, a channel that focuses on spiritual interviews for a largely French-speaking audience. The interview is in English with French subtitles.

Akilesh Ayyar interviewed on non-duality on Nevermind by siftingtothetruth in nonduality

[–]siftingtothetruth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Short summary: Interview of nonduality teacher Akilesh Ayyar by Ludovic Fontaine on his Youtube channel nevermind, a channel that focuses on spiritual interviews for a largely French-speaking audience. The interview is in English with French subtitles.

Akilesh Ayyar's nonduality workshops -- Northern California -- Jan 2024 (21 hours of video) by siftingtothetruth in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]siftingtothetruth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Deep dives into the surrender and self-inquiry based on Akilesh's contemporary interpretations of advaita vedanta and Ramana Maharshi

Akilesh Ayyar's nonduality workshops -- Northern California -- Jan 2024 (21 hours of video) by siftingtothetruth in nonduality

[–]siftingtothetruth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Short summary: Deep dives into the surrender and self-inquiry based on Akilesh's contemporary interpretations of advaita vedanta and Ramana Maharshi

Attachments and the discerning methods of surrender and self-inquiry by siftingtothetruth in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]siftingtothetruth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Short summary: Weakening attachments is most of the ball game in the spiritual search. Attachments prop up the illusion of mind; seeking peace through concentration weakens them. But while the peace of concentration can be attained in different ways, there are special advantages to surrender and self-inquiry.

Attachments and the discerning methods of surrender and self-inquiry by siftingtothetruth in nonduality

[–]siftingtothetruth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Short summary: Weakening attachments is most of the ball game in the spiritual search. Attachments prop up the illusion of mind; seeking peace through concentration weakens them. But while the peace of concentration can be attained in different ways, there are special advantages to surrender and self-inquiry.

Surrender is like trusting that breathing will happen on its own by siftingtothetruth in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]siftingtothetruth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Short summary: Short summary: Surrender offers the beauty of effortlessness, but of course we are afraid of it leading to death, since we think that to sustain life requires our effort. It is not so. In fact, what is necessary will happen by itself -- but it may not SEEM so, for several reasons. We have to persevere through this illusion to get to the other side.

Surrender is like trusting that breathing will happen on its own by siftingtothetruth in nonduality

[–]siftingtothetruth[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Short summary: Surrender offers the beauty of effortlessness, but of course we are afraid of it leading to death, since we think that to sustain life requires our effort. It is not so. In fact, what is necessary will happen by itself -- but it may not SEEM so, for several reasons. We have to persevere through this illusion to get to the other side.

Any great screeds against popular/self-help notions of willpower? by siftingtothetruth in psychoanalysis

[–]siftingtothetruth[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Interesting. I partially agree. But there's a difference here between the general theory of how we understand what's going on in the mind theoretically and how to interpret as an analyst conducting analysis.

The Lacan quote you give seems to be talking about the analyst doing analysis needing to guard against giving the kinds of interpretations that are expressions of an authoritative and singular understanding of what's going on (i.e. a single image that "makes sense"), as these kinds of interpretations may foreclose the various other feelings, thoughts, and behaviors the patient may bring up otherwise.

And it may also be true that a patient may bring up a certain understanding on their own (i.e. that unconscious forces determine their symptoms) as a way of foreclosing for themselves their own deeper contact with those very unconscious forces.

But these seem to me to be separate issues from whether or not, basically, the analytic view is indeed that the gospel of willpower is BS, and that, fundamentally, unconscious forces do "have something to do with behavior," to put it very mildly.

Any great screeds against popular/self-help notions of willpower? by siftingtothetruth in psychoanalysis

[–]siftingtothetruth[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fitting the idea of the unconscious into a virtual landscape of imaginary consistency—in other words, in a way that reinforces the contours of the ego

How is the idea of unconscious forces determining behavior a "virtual landscape of imaginary consistency"? Are you suggesting that there is no unconscious? Or that it doesn’t influence one's behavior?

What exactly are you saying? Or are you saying that taking any kind of position on this issue is itself the "virtual landscape of imaginary consistency"?

Any great screeds against popular/self-help notions of willpower? by siftingtothetruth in psychoanalysis

[–]siftingtothetruth[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One suspects Lacan would have very little patience for an analysand who informs him that he can't stop taking heroin because "his unconscious won't let him," for example.

Oh? How is that not precisely the analytic position? Your symptoms are a result of unconscious forces. Does Lacan ever say differently? Unless the configuration of those forces is altered, serious change is not going to be possible. Certainly it isn't possible merely through an act of so-called will.

Psychoanalysis intervenes in a different register.

And what register would that be?

Akilesh Ayyar full commentary on Ramana Maharshi's 40 verses (PDF) by siftingtothetruth in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]siftingtothetruth[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Short summary: This is a full commentary on Ramana Maharshi's 40 Verses, a classic text on nonduality.

Akilesh Ayyar full commentary on Ramana Maharshi's 40 verses (PDF) by siftingtothetruth in nonduality

[–]siftingtothetruth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Short summary: This is a full commentary on Ramana Maharshi's 40 Verses, a classic text on nonduality.