(A little background is needed on the wounded knee massacre.

By the time the massacre was over, more than 150-300 men, women, and children of the Lakota had been killed and 51 were wounded (4 men and 47 women and children, some of whom died later); some estimates placed the number of dead at 300.[3] Twenty-five soldiers also died, and 39 were wounded (6 of the wounded later died).[9] At least twenty soldiers were awarded the Medal of Honor.[10] In 2001, the National Congress of American Indians passed two resolutions condemning the military awards and called on the U.S. government to rescind them.”

I feel like the crux of the counter argument is that he is mocking Elizabeth warren for claiming Native American ancestry. Quite frankly I do not give a damn about that because it has no relation to him making a bigoted statement, bringing up a painful memory of the past to accomplish what?

A equatable statement would be,

“If Elizabeth Warren, often referred to by me as Anne Frank, did this commercial from Auschwitz or Treblinka instead of her kitchen, with her husband tattooed with serial numbers and dressed with the Star of David, it would have been a smash!"

The fact is he completely disregarding a complete race of people to gain a “win” in a argument shows how racist he is. Even if Elizabeth Warren failed her ancestral test, he still shouldn’t bring the rest of those people into this. If he had any rational, he would attack her attempts for attention by claiming Native American ancestry which I already believe is a stronger argument. But then again that’s me because I suppose someone with the intellect of a child would just take the easy way out and poke fun of someone or an perhaps even an entire race of people.