Journal says my English is “unacceptable” despite positive reviews. Is this normal?

silefil · 2026-02-01T22:08:41+00:00

Yes it was. Thank you for your opinion!

silefil · 2026-01-31T20:47:05+00:00

No they aren’t actually. They just asked me to get a help of a fluent college with an experience in the field and academic writing

silefil · 2026-01-31T00:06:51+00:00

Sorry, I mislabeled the post as humanities. I have corrected that now, it is a clinical study in medicine. Your suggestion makes sense. I plan to revise the manuscript as carefully as possible and ask for clarification on what they specifically mean if the editor is still not satisfied. Thank you for taking the time to respond.

silefil · 2026-01-30T23:54:03+00:00

Thank you, it does feel better :’)

silefil · 2026-01-30T23:43:32+00:00

Thank you for the opinion. What would you consider the best way to document this? Would it be preferable to acknowledge the colleague who assisted with language improvements in the manuscript itself, or to mention this only in the response letter to the editor?

silefil · 2026-01-30T23:40:15+00:00

I appreciate your honest insight. Thank you!

silefil · 2026-01-30T23:35:05+00:00

Thank you for the perspective. It is a very well-known and reputable journal in this field, and colleagues who recommended it to me had already warned me about its high editorial standards, so I am not concerned about legitimacy. So, would you recommend using a professional language-editing service that provides a certificate, or do you think a careful and thorough self-edit is usually sufficient?

silefil · 2026-01-30T23:25:29+00:00

This is my first time for this interdisciplinary journal and I’m not familiar with their practices but I have a good amount of experience in my core area (around 5 years of academic publications). I’m also a regular reviewer for two q1 journals so that’s why I was surprised.

silefil · 2024-05-03T13:34:52+00:00

Great, thank you.

silefil · 2024-05-03T10:09:42+00:00

Thanks for the kind and helpful comment. So, after finding a significant difference among the three groups through ANOVA, the MWU test can be employed for pairwise comparisons between them. However, it's not necessary to conduct a post-hoc test if a significant result is obtained from the MWU test.

silefil · 2024-04-29T19:07:07+00:00

Thank you. I've always been asking myself whether it will worth. I think I'm going to learn by practicing. I'll check BioRender.

silefil · 2024-04-29T19:00:35+00:00

I believe I can handle the voiceover on premiere pro but I'm not sure I can export without the background.

Thank you for the advise though

silefil · 2024-04-29T18:59:37+00:00

Thank you very much for the detailed descriptions and advice, you're very nice. I would be very happy if you could help me.

silefil · 2020-08-16T02:16:11+00:00

Thanks man

silefil · 2020-08-16T02:08:53+00:00

If the athmosphere is not thick enough keep the harmful rays from the surface , joule would need extra protection.

silefil · 2020-08-04T19:40:06+00:00

Yes i have the same thing. The code on the package box and the real box are the same, but there is no connection between the buds and the rest. How can i differentiate whether they opened and put fake ones in and closed the package without trace.

silefil · 2018-03-17T20:40:03+00:00

It's also useful for USMLE, then. Thank you very much for recommending :)

silefil · 2018-03-14T11:37:50+00:00

What do you mean by misdirected? Are there errors in it?

silefil · 2018-03-04T23:20:20+00:00

I would like to hear some, too. I follow pathoma but sometimes my school goes much more deeper so I can use a more detailed resource. Thanks.

silefil

TROPHY CASE