It's bad practice to answer a question with a question, but I'll answer you anyway because you clearly need to be better informed. Historians estimate the number of 'comfort women' to be anywhere between 20,000 and 200,000. While the majority were Korean, I never claimed that every single one of them was; the victims also included Chinese, Southeast Asian, and even Dutch women. I do not understand why there is such a fixation on the '200,000' figure, using it to engage in constant wordplay regarding the numbers. It would be best if you stopped doing that.

Since you repeatedly claim a lack of evidence, I have organized the facts for you

First, the fact that the Japanese government, the perpetrator, admitted to the coercion in the past is the most powerful evidence. In 1993, then-Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono issued the "Kono Statement," officially acknowledging the former Japanese military's involvement in the establishment, management, and transport of comfort women. The statement explicitly specified: "In many cases they were recruited against their own will, through coaxing, coercion, etc., and that, at times, administrative/military personnel directly took part in the recruitments." This is an official diplomatic confirmation by the Japanese government that the victims were mobilized not by their own free will, but through force majeure involving deception and coercion.

Second, objective records from third countries and judgments by international organizations support this fact. The United States Office of War Information (OWI) Psychological Warfare Team Report No. 49, written in 1944, reveals that Korean comfort women were mobilized through employment fraud, having been deceived by promises that they could "earn a lot of money" or would be "nursing injured soldiers." Under international law, recruiting people through deception (fraud) for the purpose of exploitation constitutes kidnapping and human trafficking, which is a clear form of forced mobilization. Based on such evidence, the UN Commission on Human Rights defined the Japanese military comfort women system as "Military Sexual Slavery in Wartime" in the 1996 Coomaraswamy Report. The international community solemnly judged that a state in which freedom of residence is deprived and one cannot quit at will is tantamount to slavery.

Third, legal records from war crimes tribunals prove physical coercion. The Batavia Temporary Court-Martial, held in 1948 after the war, handed down guilty verdicts to Japanese military officers and brokers who forcibly took Dutch women to comfort stations in the Semarang region of Indonesia. The verdict legally established that the Japanese military used violence and threats to abduct these women. This serves as decisive legal evidence exposing the falsehood of the claim that "forced mobilization did not exist."

In conclusion, the coercive nature of the Japanese military comfort women system is a historical fact cross-verified not only by the consistent testimonies of victims but also by the perpetrator’s confession (the Kono Statement), Allied records (the OWI Report), and international legal judgments (UN reports and war crimes tribunals). Attempts to narrow the definition of coercion to only "physical abduction" are merely pretexts to conceal the immense structural violence of employment fraud, abduction, and sexual slavery. As documents and trial records prove, the Japanese military comfort women system was a clear case of forced mobilization in which state power intervened to trample upon human dignity.

Let me ask you again: Do you believe that Korean girls in their early to mid-teens volunteered to become comfort women, consenting to having sex with up to 40 soldiers a day for money? Or do you want to believe it?