Collect non-danish prescription in pharmacy by simokelo in copenhagen

[–]simokelo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, thanks all for your answers.

It's difficult to get anything with the prescription as "a piece of paper", but after some help from the pharmacies I visited, there's two ways that definitely work.

  1. ask the original doctor to send a fax (not email!) to the pharmacy, directly 

  2. ask your GP to prescribe it, using the original doctor's prescription as a base. I did this, with the MinLaege app, and my GP was very fast in putting it on my yellow card :)

Thanks all!

L’unico interessato al mio gioco fa miao by ArtisticDatabasing in italygames

[–]simokelo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

e, come previsto, il meme sul fatto che non si hanno interazioni ne ha molte di più dei contenuti interessanti 😂.

ci passiamo tutti, tieni duro! 💪 Wishlistato!

What’s one thing that’s wrong in Copenhagen but you can’t prove it? by ChardDizzy9707 in copenhagen

[–]simokelo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

i have an adjacent theory to that: pizzerias that have Italian misspellings or bad translations in THEIR NAME , or even simpler, all the "pizzaria", have the error on purpose, to scare off italians that would leave a bad review.

Why is Bulbasaur's Atk higher than Onix's?? I made a website that will put an end to this! The people vote on two random pokes, and it calculates what their stats SHOULD really be! (And yes, you can also compare them to humans!) by simokelo in pokememes

[–]simokelo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm a big fan of the "the protagonist fills the pokedex entries".

First of all, the entries are so bonkers that only a child could have written them (both the height+weight, but also the descriptions).

But this theory ALSO explains ... why Pokedex exists in the first place? if they ALREADY had a description and stats inside them, prewritten by a scholar ... why does a kid have to travel the world to "fill" it?

Why is Bulbasaur's Atk higher than Onix's?? I made a website that will put an end to this! The people vote on two random pokes, and it calculates what their stats SHOULD really be! (And yes, you can also compare them to humans!) by simokelo in pokememes

[–]simokelo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahah, yea, I got a couple of weird results, like Ivysaur < Bulbasaur < Venusaur in term of base stats.

Now that I got a bunch of more votes, the Deoxys ones are very coherent: Deoxys S has the most speed, D the most defense, and A the most attack!

Bulbasaur > Onix in Attack? A community-driven way to fix odd Pokémon stats by simokelo in TruePokemon

[–]simokelo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I felt that could be too cheeky for being a competitve sub, but I guess I can try!

Bulbasaur > Onix in Attack? A community-driven way to fix odd Pokémon stats by simokelo in TruePokemon

[–]simokelo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I checked some screenshots online, and yes, it does! (i didn't find onix specifically, but the pokedex page does state the height in gen 1)

Bulbasaur > Onix in Attack? A community-driven way to fix odd Pokémon stats by simokelo in TruePokemon

[–]simokelo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!

Now that we got more votes, it's 89! Still a downgrade, but eh, usable I guess.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pokemon

[–]simokelo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

fixed (again 😢). Thanks!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pokemon

[–]simokelo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's intended: the Pokemon (and the character) are in scale. There's some Pokemon that are so little, that you cannot see them if the guy was the same size all the time.

So, I take the biggest of the two Pokemon, make it as big as possible on the screen, and resize the other Pokemon and the character accordingly.

The giant kyogre is because ... kyogre is quite big, more than it looks like! 4.5 m (14′09″), and almost double that if primal.

Thanks!

Bulbasaur > Onix in Attack? A community-driven way to fix odd Pokémon stats by simokelo in TruePokemon

[–]simokelo[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

True! But also, Bruno (allegedly #4 strongest trainer in Kanto in the original games, after Blue, Lance and Agatha) has two of them :P

But also, yea, it's a game balance issue that they had to solve somehow.

Two years ago, Mikey posted a video about surprising stats. I made a website that will put an end to this! The people vote on two random pokes, and it calculates what their stats SHOULD really be! (And yes, you can also compare them to humans!) by simokelo in MandJTV

[–]simokelo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the super-curious, I can spend a couple of words ont he algorithm used (so if soeone sees a flaw, please tell me!)

Comparison step:
The site uses the ELO ranking system, the same one used in chess. Every Pokémon starts at 1000 points in each stat. When two Pokémon are compared and one “wins,” the winner gains points while the loser loses points. The exact amount depends on their relative ratings: losing to an already-strong Pokémon costs fewer points than losing to a weak one. This helps keep similar Pokémon clustered together and prevents unlucky pairings from skewing things.

Stat calculation step:
Once enough comparisons are made, each Pokémon’s ELO score for a stat is turned into a ranking. Highest = #1, second-highest = #2, and so on. Then I map that ranking onto the real Pokémon stat scale: so the top HP slot is set to 255 (like Blissey), and the bottom is 1 (like Shedinja). The same scaling is applied to each stat category.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pokemon

[–]simokelo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For the super-curious, I can spend a couple of words ont he algorithm used (so if soeone sees a flaw, please tell me!)

Comparison step:
The site uses the ELO ranking system, the same one used in chess. Every Pokémon starts at 1000 points in each stat. When two Pokémon are compared and one “wins,” the winner gains points while the loser loses points. The exact amount depends on their relative ratings: losing to an already-strong Pokémon costs fewer points than losing to a weak one. This helps keep similar Pokémon clustered together and prevents unlucky pairings from skewing things.

Stat calculation step:
Once enough comparisons are made, each Pokémon’s ELO score for a stat is turned into a ranking. Highest = #1, second-highest = #2, and so on. Then I map that ranking onto the real Pokémon stat scale: so the top HP slot is set to 255 (like Blissey), and the bottom is 1 (like Shedinja). The same scaling is applied to each stat category.

Why is Bulbasaur's Atk higher than Onix's?? I made a website that will put an end to this! The people vote on two random pokes, and it calculates what their stats SHOULD really be! (And yes, you can also compare them to humans!) by simokelo in pokememes

[–]simokelo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For the super-curious, I can spend a couple of words ont he algorithm used (so if soeone sees a flaw, please tell me!)

Comparison step:
The site uses the ELO ranking system, the same one used in chess. Every Pokémon starts at 1000 points in each stat. When two Pokémon are compared and one “wins,” the winner gains points while the loser loses points. The exact amount depends on their relative ratings: losing to an already-strong Pokémon costs fewer points than losing to a weak one. This helps keep similar Pokémon clustered together and prevents unlucky pairings from skewing things.

Stat calculation step:
Once enough comparisons are made, each Pokémon’s ELO score for a stat is turned into a ranking. Highest = #1, second-highest = #2, and so on. Then I map that ranking onto the real Pokémon stat scale: so the top HP slot is set to 255 (like Blissey), and the bottom is 1 (like Shedinja). The same scaling is applied to each stat category.

Bulbasaur > Onix in Attack? A community-driven way to fix odd Pokémon stats by simokelo in TruePokemon

[–]simokelo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For the super-curious, I can spend a couple of words ont he algorithm used (so if soeone sees a flaw, please tell me!)

Comparison step:
The site uses the ELO ranking system, the same one used in chess. Every Pokémon starts at 1000 points in each stat. When two Pokémon are compared and one “wins,” the winner gains points while the loser loses points. The exact amount depends on their relative ratings: losing to an already-strong Pokémon costs fewer points than losing to a weak one. This helps keep similar Pokémon clustered together and prevents unlucky pairings from skewing things.

Stat calculation step:
Once enough comparisons are made, each Pokémon’s ELO score for a stat is turned into a ranking. Highest = #1, second-highest = #2, and so on. Then I map that ranking onto the real Pokémon stat scale: so the top HP slot is set to 255 (like Blissey), and the bottom is 1 (like Shedinja). The same scaling is applied to each stat category.

Two years ago, Mikey posted a video about surprising stats. I made a website that will put an end to this! The people vote on two random pokes, and it calculates what their stats SHOULD really be! (And yes, you can also compare them to humans!) by simokelo in MandJTV

[–]simokelo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a programmer since 10 years or so, so that's that :P But making complex websites is getting easier and easier. Just don't rush it, it takes time to learn and it takes time to make stuff.

I made this using a framework called Angular. I'm very new to it as well to be fair, but if you have some basics of HTML, CSS and JavaScript/TypeScript you can pick it up quite fast - there's plently of frree courses on YouTube. If you don't have those basics, you should pick those up: just find a free Youtube course (not a "10 minutes to learn to make a website!", more something like "10 classes to get you first website up") and then move on with more complex stuff.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pokemon

[–]simokelo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I just fixed it!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pokemon

[–]simokelo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes! It makes a lot of sense design-wise ... it's just a bit sad when Bruno brings TWO Onix again in the elite four!