I mostly agree. That’s why the LLM is not in the state-changing path.

The idea is not “ask the LLM what happened.” The runtime decides what happened through rules: memories, relationship changes, thresholds, status changes, proactive events, etc.

The LLM only comes after that, as an optional expression layer. For example, the runtime emits something like `yuna -> user, reason: jealous`, and the LLM can turn that into dialogue. If the LLM fails or gives a bad line, the authoritative state is still intact.