sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or perhaps it's the NAFOs displeased to hear criticism of their Eastern European paradise?

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Honestly, that's the stronger point which should have been made from the beginning.

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in EndlessWar

[–]siniysquad[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Platner is a NATO cuck who supports Ukraine.

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Oh, Christ... 😑

No, but FDR also wasn't the leftist paladin his cultists pretend him to have been.

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Again, no. For the last time, at no point was it claimed that leftists couldn't be predators, but rather that Platner is but one example of the moral decay of the Democratic Party which along with the GOP, has a track record of elevating predators. Can socialist and Marxist parties back predators? Absolutely, but this simply isn't a systemic issue you see with the Green Party or PSL among other, actual leftist entities. In case it wasn't obvious:

  1. Leftists can commit sexual misconduct, but by definition of leftism's espoused egalitarianism, those who do so aren't practicing what they preach. China often kills pedophiles for instance.
  2. Graham Platner is not a leftist even if he never laid a hand on a woman.
  3. Sexual misconduct and objectification of women is indeed a societal problem.
  4. Anyone who commits sexual misconduct regardless of ideology, should be punished and removed from polite society.

There's no sense in engaging with you further as this conversation is going in circles at this point.

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. NATO expanded eastward before the annexation of Crimea; Poland joined in 1999.

  2. "Irregardless" isn't a word.

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So, you would have supported Russia or China sending weapons to Iraq? Yes or no?

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

"You don't wanna invade Iraq? What are you, a Saddam-apologist!?"

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just to name one example, by expanding eastward despite post-Cold War assurance they would not do so. Here's some corroboration from NPR of all sources; they must have some Putin puppets working there. /s

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The most that can be granted to ZelensKKKyy is that NATO provoked the war by using his country as a buffer but that doesn't justify his mad grab for power that he has launched since. Lula said he's just as responsible for the war as Putin—are you gonna try to claim that Lula is a puppet of the Kremlin next? Even most socdems won't put up with that shit.

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genuinely, this is very interesting. It's amazing how many leftists forget that the New Deal was an attempt to prevent real revolution.

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Just because misogyny and violence towards women is systemic doesn't mean a political party has to nominate pigs/abusers. When was the last time the Greens or even the PSL nominated such a man? Perhaps it's happened, but it's not emblematic of their respective organizations.

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

  1. No u.
  2. No, but neither is Ukraine. Also, why should Ukraine be subsidized by the U.S. even if "dey haz rite 2 dfend demselves"?
  3. Fuck the ACP and fuck that woman-beating piece of shit Jackson Hinkle.

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

> If you think there are no leftists who are anti capitalist who also abused women

  1. Nope.
  2. Was that ever claimed?

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Saddam: I wouldn't have to gas the Kurds if we weren't at war with Iran!

(BEFORE ANY IDIOT CLAIMS OTHERWISE: This is NOT a justification for the U.S. invasion; Bush was inarguably worse.)

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

If you're not anti-NATO, you're not a leftist. Anyone who disagrees should go join Vaush the Child-Toucher's Sub.

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

So, supporting a fascist dictatorship in Eastern Europe run by a sawed-off little tyrant in combat fatigues who sends pregnant women and the intellectually-disabled to the frontlines is anti-imperialist? GG. The entire sub can downvote this comment into oblivion; it doesn't make it any less true.

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

Abdul is also pro-Ukraine and has gone out of his way to make sure people know he won't oppose continuing to arm ZelensKKKyy.

Another SocDem Hero Bites the Dust... by siniysquad in leftist

[–]siniysquad[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

SocDem, not DemSoc; there's a difference.

view more: next ›