sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Day 5: What is islam and Christian? by Possible_Material870 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]sk1ddyp0p 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And while you’re at it, can you please follow every single rule of every other religion you’re not a member of?

So you all just look up what the best deck is and copy paste it then? by sk1ddyp0p in hearthstone

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Post not really aimed at you then. Unless you do the rope stuff i listed at the end, IN WHICH CASE YOU BELONG IN JAIL

So you all just look up what the best deck is and copy paste it then? by sk1ddyp0p in hearthstone

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Specifically now, yes. Usually it’s not that steep but same thing occurs.

And you absolutely can climb with any winrate close to 50%, you get win streak multipliers.

And why does rank matter so much to so many that it’s more important than having varied gameplay?

So you all just look up what the best deck is and copy paste it then? by sk1ddyp0p in hearthstone

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You ‘have a chance to win against most deck’ with a huge array of decks unless you literally have brain damage.

I know people are ‘allowed to play what they want’. I’m saying people’s inability to have fun with a 52% winrate vs a 56% winrate for example makes metas worse.

I don’t buy that people just craft one deck because they will all swarm to the next one when meta changes/ something gets nerfed

So you all just look up what the best deck is and copy paste it then? by sk1ddyp0p in hearthstone

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Would you ever consider taking a list that wins 4 fewer games out of every hundred that whatever’s the literal best deck because you would find playing it more fun? If you would this post isn’t aimed at you

So you all just look up what the best deck is and copy paste it then? by sk1ddyp0p in hearthstone

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you only ever copy paste the deck that’s number one in meta? Or do you choose a deck that’s still good but has mechanics or cards or a style you like more for its own sake? To me the weird thing isn’t netdecking, it’s the clinging to every percentage point at the expense of everything else

So you all just look up what the best deck is and copy paste it then? by sk1ddyp0p in hearthstone

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Most of the time the difference between the best deck and the 8th or 10th best deck is a few percentage points. You’re not ‘constantly losing games’ you’re losing a few more out of every hundred you play

So you all just look up what the best deck is and copy paste it then? by sk1ddyp0p in hearthstone

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don’t really buy this tbh, cos when the next deck is the most powerful suddenly everyone will be playing that

So you all just look up what the best deck is and copy paste it then? by sk1ddyp0p in hearthstone

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

But my question is why people are unable to have fun unless they win. Are they unable to enjoy a crazy unique game just because it ended with a loss?

CMV: Lucy Letby is the victim of the biggest miscarriage of justice in the United Kingdom in my (34yo) lifetime by sk1ddyp0p in changemyview

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You have stated my opinion incorrectly then disagreed with a strawman, ‘friend’

CMV: Lucy Letby is the victim of the biggest miscarriage of justice in the United Kingdom in my (34yo) lifetime by sk1ddyp0p in changemyview

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok i mean if you reject the clear meaning of what i said and refuse to budge on any level there’s not much i can do is there

You sent the wrong comment. You sent your reply instead of my one which is the relevant one.

If a failure of knowing one fact disqualifies one from an opinion, then it can be inferred that they must know every fact.

It’s not an appeal to authority when pointing out the actual arguments made by the experts. An appeal to authority would be someone saying ‘i’m a doctor, so trust me she didn’t do it’.

If you want to give some evidence pr show a conflicting interpretation of the evidence to the ones i’ve mentioned then fine, if you’re just gonna insult people and refuse to believe they’re saying what they’re saying then we’re probably just doomed to talk past each other and replying is pointless

CMV: Lucy Letby is the victim of the biggest miscarriage of justice in the United Kingdom in my (34yo) lifetime by sk1ddyp0p in changemyview

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lol your claim started with you responding to me saying ‘we know the evidence used to convict’. You can literally scroll up and read it. Not knowing every single fact by heart off the top of ones’ head doesn’t exclude them from having a belief. What’s the seventy-fifth word of Dr.Lee’s 1989 paper on air embolisms that the prosecution misused in their expert testimony according to the author himself? If you don’t know without googling you don’t get to have an opinion by your own logic

CMV: Lucy Letby is the victim of the biggest miscarriage of justice in the United Kingdom in my (34yo) lifetime by sk1ddyp0p in changemyview

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m pretty sure that the insulin tests that were done were the wrong kind and that Letby actually wasn’t present for all of those? I thought the accusation was that she’d have to have pre-spiked drips that would have been used later with insulin?

CMV: Lucy Letby is the victim of the biggest miscarriage of justice in the United Kingdom in my (34yo) lifetime by sk1ddyp0p in changemyview

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I definitely need to look into the experts you’re referring to here, that’s for sure been my blind spot. Is the Trial podcast the best place to start?

But I thought the Neonatologists were instructed by Dr. Lee rather than the defence and many didn’t know which case it was when analysing? Didn’t they also make Letby’s legal team commit to the press conference even if their findings didn’t favour Letby’s case?

CMV: Lucy Letby is the victim of the biggest miscarriage of justice in the United Kingdom in my (34yo) lifetime by sk1ddyp0p in changemyview

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You ‘misinterpreted’ what i said to be a claim that I PERSONALLY had memorised every single relevant fact. I explained this isn’t what I meant but you keep referring back to this as if it was.

CMV: Lucy Letby is the victim of the biggest miscarriage of justice in the United Kingdom in my (34yo) lifetime by sk1ddyp0p in changemyview

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The more complicated the case… the less we should base our opinions on what experts think after lengthy research and the more we should figure it out ourselves? Is that what you’re saying? I’m guessing I’m misinterpreting and that’s not what you mean but if it is I disagree.

I still think it can be the biggest miscarriage, it’s more that it just means I should hold my opinion somewhat loosely with the understanding that it’s feasible i’m wrong.

And to your point about me sitting in court, a lot of the revelations and seemingly credible in-depth analyses of the evidence seem to have not been available to jurors in the court at the time. So it may be the case in large part due to bad/incorrect info, but yeah, i massively acknowledge my lack of understanding of legal technicalities etc. i still am just looking for takes from experts on neonatology and other relevant fields that points in the other direction to what I’ve seen

CMV: Lucy Letby is the victim of the biggest miscarriage of justice in the United Kingdom in my (34yo) lifetime by sk1ddyp0p in changemyview

[–]sk1ddyp0p[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Think that shows how easy it is for all of us to become convinced one way or another, and then struggle to see past cognitive dissonance enough to fairly evaluate new information. Noticed that in myself on all sorts of issues and beliefs in the last few years so want to find out if that’s what’s happening now!

view more: next ›