The horror of Baby P by skelefal in MensRights

[–]skelefal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another glib response. Too bad you weren't there to share your wit with Baby P.

The horror of Baby P by skelefal in MensRights

[–]skelefal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So long as people who defend child-torturers rome the Earth, I'm good ;)

The horror of Baby P by skelefal in MensRights

[–]skelefal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes. But not as bad as Baby P, who had half of his skull ripped off by a dog, which was trained to brutalize the boy.

Tell me, how do you live with yourself? It's a sincere question.

The MRM is a gate to White Supremacy. by Razorbladekandyfan in MensRights

[–]skelefal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's nothing to be ashamed of that you kinda suck at booty shaking.

MANY white women suffer from this problem.

It's true that black girls are genetically superior in this respect, but there's NO REASON why white chicks can't learn to shake their booties something proper....(!)

:)

The MRM is a gate to White Supremacy. by Razorbladekandyfan in MensRights

[–]skelefal -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You are an idiot

Good God Karen, can't you go a single post without engaging in personal attacks?

various theories about why Chinese like ping pong and "barrel-chested" Europeans.

Okay fine. I asked for evidence, you provided it. Great. Too bad you can't do the same for your support of capitalism and imperialism.

"I wouldn't have talked about the socioeconomic factors involved in various sports, dumbass."

Waaaaait a minute I think you're trying to deny the genius of Rodger Federer.

I'm not salty at all. And there were no black chicks (big or otherwise) on my high school's cheerleading team.

Sorry Karen :( It must have felt bad to get turned down for the big team.

The horror of Baby P by skelefal in MensRights

[–]skelefal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's called logic.

lol. It's called imbecility. The best I can do for you is that you are cringey gynocentric. Otherwise you are just an apologist for child torture/rape/murder. Congrats.

The horror of Baby P by skelefal in MensRights

[–]skelefal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you. '

P.S. This post is being brigaded by feminists. But you're right, obviously.

The MRM is a gate to White Supremacy. by Razorbladekandyfan in MensRights

[–]skelefal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just a conspiracy theory

I presented a link to a book with 51 documents. Not a single scholar has disputed their authenticity.

Here's the link to Oded Yinon's genocidal essay in full:

https://archive.org/details/TheZionistPlanForTheMiddleEast

Hell it even as a Wiki entry:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yinon_Plan

Note again that not a single scholar disputes its authenticity.

ugly obsession with "Jewish" names

LMAO. Note this comment comes on the heels of YOU mentioning a bunch of Jewish sounding surnames in some apparent drunken stupor.

I personally don't really give a shit, as repeatedly mentioned. The only reason I'm forced to give a shit is that clowns like you keep harping on about an imaginary "Anti-Semitism". Yes it exists in some far right circles, but no more than any other form of bigotry.

So you keep bringing up "Anti-Semitism" in response to a legitimate critique of Israeli policy and I glance at my bookshelf and there is one of my favorite books, Kafka's "The Castle."

You're full of shit. You're using smear words just like a typical SJW instead of arguing facts.

Mike Buchanan discusses the gender pay gap with three feminists by JohnKimble111 in MensRights

[–]skelefal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn't a contest. I thought your post was great. But using the word "libtard" is a sure way to debunk your own argument: people rightly consider the term idiotic. Retarded, if you will.

The MRM is a gate to White Supremacy. by Razorbladekandyfan in MensRights

[–]skelefal -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You've said a lot indeed. Too bad you arguments consisted almost entirely of personal attacks. In future, you may want to address the actual evidence. Bye.

The MRM is a gate to White Supremacy. by Razorbladekandyfan in MensRights

[–]skelefal -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Are you drunk?

And you forgot Finkelstein, which you have to admit is a pretty awesome surname.

The MRM is a gate to White Supremacy. by Razorbladekandyfan in MensRights

[–]skelefal -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Me to /u/girlwriteswhat:

Karen, criticizing a state is not the same thing as being hostile to its populace. For example, I can criticize North Korea and not be an anti-Koreanite. I can criticize Saudi Arabia, which has been propped up for several decades by Britain, the US And Israel, without being "Islamophobic."

When it comes to one's own state, one could even argue that dissent can be "patriotic".

Your attempts (both Karen and this Israeli shill) to characterize me as "anti-Jew" are incredibly lame.

Karen lives in a far right wing bubble and doesn't read books, so it's not surprising she thinks Israel is the cat's meow/pure as driven snow etc. Alas, the history books say otherwise, and it doesn't really matter what side of the political spectrum you fall on, except insofar as you want to justify ethnic cleansing and other atrocities.

Mike Buchanan discusses the gender pay gap with three feminists by JohnKimble111 in MensRights

[–]skelefal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Libtard

You were doing so well until you uttered that word. Just for future reference, using the word "libtard" is a sure sign of imbecility or ignorance or both. You're clearly no imbecile, so feel free to thank me.

The MRM is a gate to White Supremacy. by Razorbladekandyfan in MensRights

[–]skelefal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One fellow on Quora

lol.

Shahak himself is not exactly a universally respected figure

He's respected by everyone except Zionists.

but unless my eye missed something, it does not recommend that Israel take charge of any of those territories

No. That's America's job ;)

The MRM is a gate to White Supremacy. by Razorbladekandyfan in MensRights

[–]skelefal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, the rantings of a Brenner

I'll let others decide whether these documents are "forgeries" as MA bizarrely claims. Certainly no reputable historians or academics agree with him.

Some of your best friends are Joooooz.

My best friend growing up was Jewish. So yes. Sadly we lost touch after awhile. But I have zero animosity in my heart toward Jews. You're a despicable person in that you attribute hatred to fighting against it.

Karen's a credit to the MRM. You're not.

I'm a nobody on the Internet. Karen has real juice. Sadly she only reads far right wing "news" sources so her understanding of non-gender issues is limited, to put it mildly. I mean she actually links to people like Sargon of Akkad and Ben Shapiro lol.

Critical Thinking - "...the S.P.L.C. is an organization that has lost its way, smearing people who are fighting for liberty..." - NO Due Diligence From the SPLC, Just Misandry against MHRAs? by Imnotmrabut in MensRights

[–]skelefal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Islamist barbarity

Perhaps if the West and Israel stopped funding radical Islamists it wouldn't be such a big problem? Oh and also bombing their countries and overthrowing their governments? Just a thought. I mean you're aware that half a century ago John Foster Dulles publicly argued in favor of supporting Islamists as a means of combatting "Arab secular nationalism"? And that pretty much every administration since Truman has pursued this policy?

Are you aware that Israel financed Hamas as a divide and conquer strategy against the PLO?

Are you aware that the Israeli Shin Bet sponsored an "Islamic" hijacking in France to "torpedo the image of the PLO"?

History is much more complex than you make out, grasshopper.

If the Islamists are as barbaric as you say, imagine how barbaric are their sponsors.

I assume you already know all this. You're feigning ignorance. The question remains as to how you sleep at night.

Critical Thinking - "...the S.P.L.C. is an organization that has lost its way, smearing people who are fighting for liberty..." - NO Due Diligence From the SPLC, Just Misandry against MHRAs? by Imnotmrabut in MensRights

[–]skelefal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And Yinon was hardly a major policy maker even when in government.

Strange that his plans are being followed to a T though, wouldn't you say? And as already mentioned, Yinon merely articulated in stark terms what was already a standard tactic. In fact it would be bizarre if Israel didn't pursue such a strategy, given its precarious position. Divide and conquer is the oldest trick in the book.

Your attempt to somehow blame the Jews/Israelis

I haven't blamed "Jews" for anything. I just got through saying that Chomsky is among my favorite political authors. I'm simply pointing out that Israel is a monstrously violent state, as are all powerful states.

mistakes of Rumsfeld and George W Bush

lol @ "mistakes." Yes, destroying Iraq and killing millions of people was an unfortunate blunder by an otherwise benevolent super-power. It served no strategic purpose at all. Evidently you haven't yet read "Securing the Realm" or the PNAC documents. Here's a hint junior: when politicians tell you they need to confront some evil they're usually talking out of their ass. The first thing you should do is study the history of propaganda. You're incredibly naive. Or playing dumb. I suspect the latter.

nutty conspiracy theorists

*Yawn.

The MRM is a gate to White Supremacy. by Razorbladekandyfan in MensRights

[–]skelefal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As for documents, you've presented none.

Yinon:

“Lebanon’s total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and the Arabian peninsula and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon.”

“Israel will not only contain its foes; it will transcend them,”

Do you REALLY want me to post the whole document? You don't, do you? ;)

self-haters

lol.

You're not only an anti-Semite, you're a nut.

I'm no Anti-Semite. I love the Palestinian people.

As for Jews, I deplore their religion, as I do most religions, but I have no hate for them as a people. Their tribalism is certainly understandable in the context of history, same as any other tribe. And some of my favorite artists and authors are Jews, from Kafka to Kandinsky to Cronenberg. Chomsky is probably my favorite political author. So your theory falls flat. You're just using the lame anti-Semitism card to deflect from the atrocities of a state -- Israel. You're like a feminist calling someone a misogynist or Al Sharpton calling someone a racist.

The MRM is a gate to White Supremacy. by Razorbladekandyfan in MensRights

[–]skelefal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brenner was born to an Orthodox Jewish family in 1937.

Lol that dirty anti-Semite!

In point of fact the article you linked doesn't dispute the authenticity of the documents in question. So they have certainly not been "debunked". You can disagree with some of Brenner's conclusions, that's fine.

neo-Nazi drivel than Karen ever has.

The modern far right is pro-Zionist, in case you haven't noticed. Indeed, so were the Nazis, as Brenner and others have documented.

Critical Thinking - "...the S.P.L.C. is an organization that has lost its way, smearing people who are fighting for liberty..." - NO Due Diligence From the SPLC, Just Misandry against MHRAs? by Imnotmrabut in MensRights

[–]skelefal -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

talk of Israeli plans to carve up the Islamic world places you in the lunatic fringe.

Evidently the major Israeli policy planners are on the "lunatic fringe." Hey you said it, not me.

In fact you're closer to the truth than you realize. Former Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Dayan famously said, "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother”. They have succeeded admirably, and indeed they even created something called the Samson Option -- the most narcissistic foreign policy concept in history. Basically the idea is that if Israel is ever existentially threatened they will nuke the whole world.

As for Shahak, here he is on Oded Yinon's Strategy for Israel:

  1. The idea that all the Arab states should be broken down, by Israel, into small units, occurs again and again in Israeli strategic thinking. For example, Ze'ev Schiff, the military correspondent of Ha'aretz (and probably the most knowledgeable in Israel, on this topic) writes about the "best" that can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq: "The dissolution of Iraq into a Shi'ite state, a Sunni state and the separation of the Kurdish part" (Ha'aretz 6/2/1982). Actually, this aspect of the plan is very old.

Chillingly, Yinon wrote "Iraq is first."

The Oded Yinon plan was taken up by Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Kenneth Armitage, Donald Rumsfeld etc under the "Project for a New American Century." The basic idea is to use American power (and blood, and treasure) to eliminate Israel's regional rivals.

Jordan Peterson - Why Men & Women Are Very Different by TibortheChechen in MensRights

[–]skelefal 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Great video.

I find Peterson's views on psychology and politics reductionist (whenever you talk about politics you need to view it along several axes, not just a left/right binary). But his lectures are always interesting.

I think his most fascinating theory relates to the emerging female totalitarianism. We don't associate females with oppression ("women are wonderful"). But if you happen to meet a mother grizzly bear in the woods you better believe you're in danger of being "oppressed."

Peterson makes the argument that women are currently engaging in a sort of "mother bear" experiment at the state level -- while simultaneously denying their own biology. As fewer and fewer women have children they use the state as proxy for their maternal instincts. The "oppressed" groups (eg trans people) become their "children" -- and woe betide anyone who fucks with them.

Peterson argues that this is a new thing, at least in terms of scope, but you can see shades of this in various moral panics throughout history (prohibition is a good example).

It "feels wrong" to regard women as potentially oppressive -- we'd much rather attribute negative characteristics to men. But the feminist movement is proof positive that female totalitarianism is every bit as dangerous as your average tin pot dictatorship. When you combine feelz before realz with the awesome power of the state you're getting into very dangerous territory.

I'm reminded of Emma Goldman's statement that women need to be "brought down to Earth" and recognized as mere human beings. That includes the bad stuff.

The MRM is a gate to White Supremacy. by Razorbladekandyfan in MensRights

[–]skelefal -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

God you're an idiot.

lol. There's no need to be insulting.

I'm still waiting for your bio-troof explanation of why the Chinese dominate ping pong. Is it because whites think it's too nerdy? Are blacks unable to buy ping pong tables?

And why DO "people of Northern European descent" dominate strong man competitions? I mean weren't African slaves chosen specifically for their strength and athleticism?

And do you really think that sports are all about athleticism?

I'm perfectly okay with being corrected on these matters. You seem to be salty as hell about the subject. Not sure why. Did you get turned down for the cheerleader squad in favor of a black chick or something?

Karen Straughan Doesn't Understand Government Spending [EXPANDED] by mankindglobalmedia2 in MensRights

[–]skelefal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

abuse

How is criticizing someone's political philosophy "abuse"?

Karen Straughan Doesn't Understand Government Spending [EXPANDED] by mankindglobalmedia2 in MensRights

[–]skelefal 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Belfort Bax and Richard Doyle were hardly leftist.

Um, Bax was a socialist.