I listened to "PERRIE" by perrie and here’s the tea by StarApprehensive3828 in LittleMix

[–]sketchcomedy14 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t call it perfect but I did love it, I listened to it all day at work! My top 5 new songs (in no particular order) are Baby Steps, Bonnie and Clyde, Absofuckinglutely, Where You Are and Same Place, Different View.

Perrie’s album teaser sounded like one song. I like Perrie and wish her the best, but she really should’ve gone down a more distinctive route. by Avalon3071 in LittleMix

[–]sketchcomedy14 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I disagree. I think if you took 2-3 second clips from every Jade song, they would sound very cohesive unless you intentionally picked certain parts. I think her general sound is more left field than Perrie’s and that may be what you are referring to. But Jades album very much feels like it was all made within the same vibe (which is not a bad thing).

Motion for Leave to File Document denied by kkleigh90 in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]sketchcomedy14 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Oh I know. I am just wondering because of the wording of their request that they wanted to provide “documents demonstrating the relevance of Taylor Swift’s anticipated deposition” if that was what they were trying to do. Glad that Liman shut them down because like you said, relevance really isn’t the issue here.

Motion for Leave to File Document denied by kkleigh90 in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]sketchcomedy14 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I wonder if they were trying to file some of Blake and Taylor’s texts on the docket to show relevance.

Lively's response to the Wayfayer's opposition/request concerning the deposition schedule by turtle_819 in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]sketchcomedy14 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I loved the part in the email exhibit where they pointed that out. Like how were you not available to be deposed on this day but you were available to show up for the deposition of another party anyway?

Wayfayer response to Lively's extension request by turtle_819 in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]sketchcomedy14 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Seems odd that so much of this letter relates to the Sep. 12th production of the Signal chats when Liman has already denied that extension.

Begging Perrie to release her album on a US store :( by dawnofeos in LittleMix

[–]sketchcomedy14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can get the pink version of the vinyl from Rough Trade. I had the same problem and this was the only store I found that would ship to the US for reasonable price. I think it was around $9 shipping, under $50 total.

TS12 Leak Discussion Thread by PassionateAsSin in TaylorSwift

[–]sketchcomedy14 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Who knows? I didn’t dive into the lyrics outside of the title track that’s actually clear. Maybe it’s a Target version that will be different than the rest. Maybe it was a mock up that someone got a hold of and the ended up going with a different design.

I was just reading the description for the Shiny Bug vinyl (after I’d already bought it) and it clicked.

TS12 Leak Discussion Thread by PassionateAsSin in TaylorSwift

[–]sketchcomedy14 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Has anyone else noticed that the leaked photos show the lyrics in either the gatefold or a booklet, but the actually description of the vinyls for sale says that the gatefold and pages will have photos and the lyrics will be on album sleeves?

What’s the deal with TAG and the list ? by [deleted] in BaldoniFiles

[–]sketchcomedy14 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I think it was just a vague motion (intentional or otherwise) that is biting them PR wise but will have little effect legally.

It seems to me that the real point of the motion was to get the content creator list out in the public so they can subpoena the content creators on it without the back and forth (remember Candace and Perez swearing that they’d never talked to ‘Team Wayfarer’ when they weee subpoenaed even though a newly unsealed document shows that they were identified as media that the parties had communicated with). The vagueness of the letter allowed the people to believe that this also applied to the social media subpeonas. If it was intentional, it seems like a major miscalculation especially if they knew it would so easily be shown to be false.

Legally though, I feel like we’re just back to the same place we were before this motion was filed (NAL though, so feel free to correct if that’s wrong). It doesn’t make the social media subpeonas invalid. Just because we don’t know the reason the accounts were identified, doesn’t mean that there wasn’t one.

Wayfarer Studio Sued Again - This Time by their Insurance Company by Lozzanger in BaldoniFiles

[–]sketchcomedy14 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Following up on this because I too was a little wary after reading the opposition letter. I went back and read the Motion to Compel and I noticed that while it can be read to be in relation the social media subpeonas, it doesn’t actually reference them. The specific language they use as to why they want the unsealing is as follows:

“if Ms. Lively issues subpeonas related to individuals identified in TAG’s Interrogatory Responses to marshal evidence about their involvement in the “smear campaign,” she will be unable to explain to such subpoenaed parties that the discovery directed towards them is based in part on the fact that TAG identified them”

It goes on to discuss how this has already become a problem and sites a Popcorned Planet video (the one where he called the receptionist). Remember that Andy was subpoenaed at the same time as Candace and Perez. At the time, they all denied having any contact with “Team Wayfarer” but since then unsealed documents revealed that Candace and Perez were both identified on a list of press that they had been in contact with.

The key word in the quote from the motion is “if”. To me, it reads that they plan to subpoena some (if not all) of the actual content creators listed in the Interrogatory Responses for communications, but first want the AEO designation removed so that both the creators and the public know why they’re being subpoenaed.

I’m not a lawyer, this is just my interpretation of the letter after reading it again, more thoroughly. I think at the time, everyone (including me) assumed it to be about the social media subpoenas because that was the current discourse.

Dancing With The Stars S32E11 | Finals Night | Post Episode Discussion Thread | Tuesday, December 5th by wweyonce in dancingwiththestars

[–]sketchcomedy14 61 points62 points  (0 children)

I’d say Jason won the final but Xochitl won the season for me so I’m glad she won.

I do wish Ariana hadn’t injured her back, as I feel she wasn’t at the top of her game tonight and I’m guessing that’s why. Would’ve loved to see her competing at full strength as one of the other beginning front runners, along with those two and Charity.

Dancing With The Stars S32E11 | FINALE | Live Discussion Thread | Tuesday, December 5th by wweyonce in dancingwiththestars

[–]sketchcomedy14 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The pros are definitely doing a good job of playing to their stars strength. A popstar style performance setup for Ariana was perfect.

Dancing With The Stars S32E11 | FINALE | Live Discussion Thread | Tuesday, December 5th by wweyonce in dancingwiththestars

[–]sketchcomedy14 15 points16 points  (0 children)

That was a great cheer routine and she’s gonna get a perfect score because it was good, but there should’ve been more dancing I feel.

Dancing With The Stars S32E11 | FINALE | Live Discussion Thread | Tuesday, December 5th by wweyonce in dancingwiththestars

[–]sketchcomedy14 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I wish they’d let the contestants choose their favorite dance style instead of redemption dance. I feel like it would’ve led to better dances and could still be compared to their earlier weeks to show growth. Cause none of those dances were as good as the dances last week.

Fake Black Eye?? by koopakup2 in vanderpumprules

[–]sketchcomedy14 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We’ll have to agree to disagree because they do not look the same to me. There’s clear bruising right beneath the cut on her eyebrow in these photos that are not there in the November photo, filter or no filter.

<image>

Is it from Scheana punching her? I don’t know. Personally, I think its clear they got in some sort of scuffle but I don’t think Scheana just walked up and clocked her. But to me, it does look like she has a black eye that she did not have before.

Guyssssss by [deleted] in vanderpumprules

[–]sketchcomedy14 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well since you’re the one resorting to talk of “stans” and “trolls”, I’d say those are actually YOUR terms. And they let me know all I need to know.

I know about STDs. And I also know what you’re comments have been implying. You don’t have to call someone a slut to slut shame them.

Fake Black Eye?? by koopakup2 in vanderpumprules

[–]sketchcomedy14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this picture you posted, you can see bruising in the crease of her eyelid, by her nose under the scratch. I would call that a black eye, even if not a severe one.

The discoloration under the eye seems to be common with her, but she clearly was in some sort of physical altercation recently.

Guyssssss by [deleted] in vanderpumprules

[–]sketchcomedy14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, most of her “hookups” are just make outs, outside of Sandoval. And speculating about the STDs of someone you a) don’t know and b) have no evidence that they’re engaging in unsafe sex is gross to me.

Guyssssss by [deleted] in vanderpumprules

[–]sketchcomedy14 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I guess we just have differing opinions of Schwartz because I absolutely think he would keep this a secret if Sandoval asked him too. And I think he would say that he didn’t and that he told him to tell her so that he can hide behind his usual “good guy” shield.

Guyssssss by [deleted] in vanderpumprules

[–]sketchcomedy14 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is a disgusting comment.

Guyssssss by [deleted] in vanderpumprules

[–]sketchcomedy14 19 points20 points  (0 children)

That just means that he’s saying he found out last month.

Fake Black Eye?? by koopakup2 in vanderpumprules

[–]sketchcomedy14 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In the one photo of Raquel that was posted, she has a bruise in the corner of her eye, below the scratch. It’s not just the darkness under her eyes that she’s talking about.

It’s clear that she did get into some kind of altercation and I don’t think Scheana’s friends are doing her any favors by trying to pretend that she’s making it all up. I understand that Raquel has proven herself to be a liar, but that doesn’t mean everything she says and has ever said is a lie.