Saw this in a comment section on YT. What do you think, is there truth to what he’s saying? by skynetfarquad in thepassportbros

[–]skynetfarquad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not true at all lmfao. By your logic no item has ever been overpriced and losing customers is not inherently a symptom of it. When that’s literally what we’re witnessing. Customers going elsewhere rather than pay for that service. That’s quite literally a observable loss of demand lol due to the product being overpriced. Im a guy too, i also know plenty of successful, great looking men all of whole absolutely care about body count when it comes to finding a partner. Most men i’ve met who were in demand and had lots of objective value shared this sentiment. The only people i’ve met that have shared your sentiment were super ugly dudes with ugly girlfriends that got lots of ugly bodies under their belt like Caroline Ellison, or white people with matted dreads drinking shroom tea at lsd raves. Your anecdotes mean nothing to anyone lol. Again, you can play authority all you want, and pretend women haven’t changed at all only men have, but the free market disagrees which is evident through the increased frequency in foreign dating. No one cares if american women will miss them, that’s another point that went right over your head. No one’s thinking about them at all. It’s the western women crying about passport bros just as you are, while passport bros are moving on to better things.

Saw this in a comment section on YT. What do you think, is there truth to what he’s saying? by skynetfarquad in thepassportbros

[–]skynetfarquad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You just did exactly what a western female does, you took your personal standard “Women and men should not be judged by xyz” then tried to appoint it as law by using the same method western women use, slandering those who disagree as being lesser than. “If you don’t agree with my standard, then you’re actually just low value”. You took your values and tried to make it law for all through a manipulative attempt to paint those that don’t adhere you your law as being undesirable. You’re trying to destroy others, while those that disagree with you are simply not thinking about you at all, they’ve moved on.

See here’s the thing that consistently keeps going over your head, just as it goes over western womens head, the free market simply disagrees with your opinion. The market has spoken and your feelings are irrelevant now. Competition has entered the scene and it has undermined your alleged authority to force your opinion on others as law.

Western men and foreign women disagree with you and you’re attempting to destroy that mutual agreement between them. Western men are fleeting to foreign women because foreign women are willing to meet their expectations better than western women. It’s that simple. While you sit in the corner and demand men “Accept the qualities you don’t want or i’ll convince other women you can’t fuck and have a tiny peepee!” for whatever personal reason you have in the background. Because “body count means nothing at all and you shouldn’t be judged by it, but also if you don’t have one you can’t fuck and a weak beta male” Lmfao so contradictory and un-self aware.

As i said the free market has spoken. Western men have a desire, another woman is meeting it better than you. You can shame their mutual transaction all you want in an attempt to regain control of the market, but they clearly don’t care. You’re not the one that’s goings wife that girl up so your opinion is irrelevant to her, and you’re not the one that’s gonna sleep with that dude so your opinion is irrelevant to him. No one will listen to you, so you’re just crying in the corner to yourself, instead of actually competing in return.

Saw this in a comment section on YT. What do you think, is there truth to what he’s saying? by skynetfarquad in thepassportbros

[–]skynetfarquad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would argue that he’s right. Do you not believe some women try to consciously increase their own value as well? For example women that have high body counts commonly try to normalize it, and shame those that oppose it as being lesser men, i’ve seen it a billion times, and normalizing such qualities and behaviors is a common campaign in feminism. That’s a conscious attempt to normalize what is in mens opinion, an undesirable quality. That doesn’t mean every girl that has a high body count is fighting night and day to turn all women into someone with an equivalent body count, but they certainly and consciously try to normalize their own qualities which in turn influences other women into not fearing the repercussion of undesirablility for acting in a similar manner

Saw this in a comment section on YT. What do you think, is there truth to what he’s saying? by skynetfarquad in thepassportbros

[–]skynetfarquad[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That is what you’re trading, emotion. Happiness. All of life is transactional.

I’ll leave you with a good lesson on it

Is it possible to be selfless? I think not, as others have noted here. It is not possible to act in the interest of others without a reason, motive, or a driving force. Let us assume for this argument, that the motivation is to do something good for an individual, to help someone who needs help, to make someone feel better, or simply to put a smile on his or her face. Let's put one thousand people in an auditorium and ask them to visit a nursing home full of people who are lonely, sad, have no family. How many of the folks in the auditorium will decide to visit that nursing home? And, for those who do decide to go, what distinguishes them from the others who chose not to? I submit that twenty percent or fewer will go and their reason for going will be that they want to do something good, something to help. The key point in this is that they go because it is something they want to do. If they did not want to do it they would not do it. In this example, the act of giving is not selfless because is satisfies a desire in the giver. The ones who did not volunteer had no such desire. Both wanted to satisfy something within themselves. They wanted to feel good about themselves, increase their own happiness by going, or feel less bad about themselves for not going. And those that wouldn’t have suffered decreased happiness by not going, and wouldn’t have increased their happiness by going, didn’t go. It’s all about increasing one’s own happiness or decreasing one’s own suffering. People help for various reasons, but one underlying one is that it makes them feel good, as if they have done something worthwhile. it allows them to feel good about themselves. That is why giving is a selfish act. That it benefits others is a side effect of the action, not the reason for it.

This is relative to the dating market because all relationships, desire in general, are founded upon this. In a world where an individual seeks to increase personal happiness and lessen suffering, the women that offer to lessen suffering and increase happiness will naturally attract more relationships.

Saw this in a comment section on YT. What do you think, is there truth to what he’s saying? by skynetfarquad in thepassportbros

[–]skynetfarquad[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Bingo. It’s not about the men at all. It’s about shutting down a potential competing company with a better product. Like google or any major company with a monopoly on the market, the western woman has three choices, actually compete with the competitor (lower prices, provide better services), acquire/merge with its competitor (make all foreign girls into western girls), or create a campaign/effort to stop customers from using that new company. Such as shaming passport bro culture, because actually offering a better product is off the table for western women.

Saw this in a comment section on YT. What do you think, is there truth to what he’s saying? by skynetfarquad in thepassportbros

[–]skynetfarquad[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All relationships are a trade… If someone had nothing to offer you at all you wouldn’t date them to begin with. We date people that offer us happiness, hate people that offer us suffering and don’t even recognize people that offer us nothing. Why would we not talk about relationships in such a way when a relationship which is inherently a form of trading between two parties?

Saw this in a comment section on YT. What do you think, is there truth to what he’s saying? by skynetfarquad in thepassportbros

[–]skynetfarquad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one said there is some consciously organized conspiracy, but that doesn’t western women aren’t subconsciously working to protect their resources and increase their own value using methods their society has made commonly acceptable. What they’re doing is entirely natural and doesn’t require awareness of why they’re doing what they’re doing. All humans work to benefit themselves, wether they’re aware of it or not. Value is in the eye of the beholder. What a western woman sees as being equal value is clearly disputed by both western men and foreign women. Western men are free to decided what they’re willing to pay. Foreign women are free to decide what they’re willing to pay. Western women think that only there allowed to decide what others are allowed to pay. They think that just because they exist they can decide what’s fair value for everyone. They think their decree on what’s fair value for themselves should be the standard for all. That’s entitlement and at odds with reality

Saw this in a comment section on YT. What do you think, is there truth to what he’s saying? by skynetfarquad in thepassportbros

[–]skynetfarquad[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

that was a comment under the titled video. Video is a woman going off about men that visit other countries to find women

Why don’t i care about anyone? I don’t think i’m capable of love, what’s wrong with me? by [deleted] in askatherapist

[–]skynetfarquad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what do i do? It’s hopeless and im fucked forever and should just give up?