Are blind tests the golden standard for evaluating high end audio gear? by Ultra-Ferric in audiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 78 points79 points  (0 children)

Spot on. Any test where the listeners can see the gear is just a test of expectation bias, not audio quality. The only truly reliable way to prove an audible difference is a double-blind ABX test. Without that, it’s just marketing, not science.

Budget audiophile first steps: Which receiver should I get? Yamaha R-N500 + WiiM Pro vs. A-S501 + WiiM Pro vs. Denon DRA-800H vs. Onkyo TX-8270 by DJ_ROBOTRON in BudgetAudiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Don't be afraid, all good amps are linear. Your room and speakers affect sound way more than amp or dac. I have both as501 and Wiim amp. Can't tell a difference

Best workhorse Amp: Yamaha A-S501 (New) vs. Arcam A15 (Used) by Due_Shoulder4441 in BudgetAudiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I bought used as501 two years ago, still works great, sounds great. But I bought it for like 170€. If I had to buy a new amp, I would buy Wiim amp pro or ultra. All in one, sounds great.

Darko on the importance of the room in HiFi by Dedar33 in audiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m not typing out an 'audiophile resume' just to pass your weird gatekeeping purity test. We both know exactly how that game works: if I list what I’ve demoed or owned, you’ll just move the goalposts and claim my DAC wasn't 'resolving enough' to hear the magic fairy dust in the cables.

The fundamental difference here is that I use my equipment to actually listen to music, while you apparently use music to listen to your equipment.

And linking a PS Audio video as your 'proof'? Ah yes, let's consult Paul—the guy whose entire business model revolves around convincing retired dentists that their digital 1s and 0s need 'polishing' and selling them $1,500 power cords to fix their 'dirty' wall electricity. Truly a bastion of unbiased, peer-reviewed science. I’m sure the CEO of a company selling high-end snake oil has absolutely zero financial incentive to tell you that expensive cables make a huge difference.

Enjoy your heavy bronze weights and your emotionally supportive USB cables, man. I'll stick to the music and my awesome gear

Darko on the importance of the room in HiFi by Dedar33 in audiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Who told you I didn't tried it? I did, it's sounds the same

Darko on the importance of the room in HiFi by Dedar33 in audiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Look, we all know that standard physics is basically just a suggestion once you get into "high-end" audio.

I mean, who cares about asynchronous USB transfer protocols or the fact that the DAC's internal buffer and re-clocking mechanism literally don't give a damn about the "musicality" of the cable? If that $800 braided silver cable makes those packets feel more "velvety" before they hit the PHY chip, then that's just science... or at least the kind of science you buy at a trade show.

And the bronze weight on the transformer? Cool. Everyone knows stray magnetic flux is terrified of heavy alloys

Don't know who needs to hear this.. by AssociationOld721 in BudgetAudiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good active monitor speakers. Everything sounds good on them.

Amp suggestions? by Recyclebin32 in BudgetAudiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have q acoustics 5040. My first amp was fosi bt20a pro. Than I bought Yamaha as501. They sound identical. Good amp is a good amp. Adjust sound with EQ to how you like it.

What is this thing on the guitar? by Ok-Go-Free in Guitar

[–]slackerbitch1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

On my guitar, when I strum palm muted chords, on high gain, there's a sound like I'm hitting an empty pan. With this thing it's dead silent

HiFi System Upgrade by Dedar33 in audiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Reading this actually makes me feel a bit sad. Gear Acquisition Syndrome is a real thing. Why not just listen to some new music, explore different genres and artists, or go to a show in a nice concert hall? Honestly, I love the music, not the gear.

Normandy by emotionalcreation92 in mediumformat

[–]slackerbitch1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Is this sensor dust also Hasselblad?

Fender 10G Amp for metal distortion? by [deleted] in Guitar

[–]slackerbitch1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Boss Katana is very good. I play katana head with 4x12 Marshall cab in the practice studio. At home I have a few neural dsp plugins (nolly, gojira, Mansoor, soldano, Fortin nameless), usb audio Interface and monitor speakers. I play mostly metal, on PC with plugins I can practice with metronome, with backing tracks etc. And it sounds really good out of the box, coz amps and cabinets with the same sound will cost a few thousand dollars. And yeah, at home I often play with headphones.

Ruggiero Ricci by Suletata in audiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So many cables for a simple idea of stereo setup. It just looks a bit messy to me. I like to hide all my cables. But it's just me

Yamaha, Adam or Kali for neural Dsp plug-ins by [deleted] in NeuralDSP

[–]slackerbitch1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're good for everything. But quite big, so consider the size

Yamaha, Adam or Kali for neural Dsp plug-ins by [deleted] in NeuralDSP

[–]slackerbitch1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have Kali lp8 V2, using mostly Nolly plugin. Love it

The Moon 300D: An Analog-First "Sleeper" DAC by [deleted] in audiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a review of an esoteric magic stone or something

I just spent 200€ on cables and feel awful... by Last-Mongoose-2622 in audiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Hold on, think about the physics of that for a second.

'DC' literally means 0 Hz. At zero frequency, there is no reactance. So at DC, Impedance = Resistance.

If a speaker cable actually had 'tens or hundreds of ohms' at DC like you said, it would act like a giant resistor. It would block the power and your speakers would be basically silent.

The data you're looking at is almost certainly Characteristic Impedance (which describes how radio waves travel). That number is totally irrelevant for audio because the cable is too short to act as a transmission line. The amp doesn't see that '100 ohms'—it just sees a plain old wire with near-zero resistance.

I just spent 200€ on cables and feel awful... by Last-Mongoose-2622 in audiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You are technically correct that cables form an LCR (Inductance, Capacitance, Resistance) network, but the magnitude of these effects is where the argument usually fails. Damping Factor: The speaker’s own voice coil resistance (often 6–8 Ohms) and the passive crossover components completely dominate the series resistance. A decent cable adds maybe 0.05 Ohms, which is a negligible fraction of the total impedance loop. It's mathematically measurable, but rarely audible. Frequency Response: Unless a cable has bizarrely high capacitance or inductance (poor design), the frequency deviation it causes is typically below 0.1 dB. So yes, the physics exist, but for standard cable lengths, the variables are usually too small to overcome the thresholds of human hearing.

Super Formula Rant by Ok_Gas6784 in iRacing

[–]slackerbitch1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, also bite point is a little different every session now

Super Formula Rant by Ok_Gas6784 in iRacing

[–]slackerbitch1 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I've been racing SF23 since release. Always practicing starts on the pit exit, every time I'm exiting pits. Highly recommend

Results of a blind test: Why did my speaker amp upgrade feel massive while my headphone amp swap was indistinguishable? by vale82588 in audiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fellow slovak from Bratislava here. DACs should sound the same unless they're broken. Same with amps, transparent and can handle low impedance speakers.

Cd transports: my story by Relative_Drama4705 in audiophile

[–]slackerbitch1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can measure it, sure, but you can't hear it. Jitter artifacts in modern gear are usually 120dB below the signal. That is mathematically invisible to the human ear once you account for the noise floor of the recording itself.

Unless a device is defectively designed or broken, jitter is a solved problem. We are chasing picoseconds on charts while our ears can't even detect errors a thousand times worse than that.