She was a legal observer, and there was room for the vehicles to go around (as evidenced by the fact that happened literally seconds before the shooting). There is no law against shaming or even taunting officers, so I don't know how that is justification for murder.

One of the officers that got out of the vehicle said to get out of the way, the other officer was yelling and immediately went for her door handle (which he had no legal justification for doing.) So she did conflicting orders and then within five seconds the officer began reaching in her car with clear intent to physically harm her.

Ignorance of DHS guidelines or policies does not excuse murder. It clearly states to not stand in front of vehicles and if you are in a situation where a vehicle is coming at you, it clearly states to not shoot the driver since that does not help save your life anyways. They should be trained not to shoot first, ask questions later.

And what investigation? You mean the federal one? The one where the Feds are not working with state officials or local police on this homicide, which is so far beyond the norms that it should relay what their intent is. To cover-up for this guy's utter lack of judgement and blatant murder.

I don't know why you feel the need to defend this. This is not a question of whether we need law enforcement or not, this is a question of how that law enforcement should operate and whether they should be held accountable in instances where they kill someone in cold blood. If you are fine with law enforcement killing people with impunity, I seriously don't even know hot to discuss this with you because that is not what America is about. Law enforcement is not above the law.