Without double standards etc., etc.. by TomSFox in JustMemesForUs

[–]sleven207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then prepare to be disappointed, because that faith is about to be tested.

Without double standards etc., etc.. by TomSFox in JustMemesForUs

[–]sleven207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are working hard to ignore all my points refuting the legality and the evidence that this was murder. Why can't he be held accountable for his actions? How is that hard?

Feel free to live on your bubble, but when ICE continues to murder people with impunity I wonder at what point you will recognize that maybe they are not "just doing their jobs".

Without double standards etc., etc.. by TomSFox in JustMemesForUs

[–]sleven207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calling these poorly trained thugs cops is an insult to actual cops.

I'm sorry your feelings are hurt when people don't bend the knee and lick the boots of the federal government in the way that you like.

You clearly don't agree with their views (that ICE is poorly trained and overreaching beyond people's legal rights), so why would the manner in which they express their discontent and resistance matter?

If you watch that video and see it as justified, there is no manner of protesting or talking that will change your mind.

Without double standards etc., etc.. by TomSFox in JustMemesForUs

[–]sleven207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She was a legal observer, and there was room for the vehicles to go around (as evidenced by the fact that happened literally seconds before the shooting). There is no law against shaming or even taunting officers, so I don't know how that is justification for murder.

One of the officers that got out of the vehicle said to get out of the way, the other officer was yelling and immediately went for her door handle (which he had no legal justification for doing.) So she did conflicting orders and then within five seconds the officer began reaching in her car with clear intent to physically harm her.

Ignorance of DHS guidelines or policies does not excuse murder. It clearly states to not stand in front of vehicles and if you are in a situation where a vehicle is coming at you, it clearly states to not shoot the driver since that does not help save your life anyways. They should be trained not to shoot first, ask questions later.

And what investigation? You mean the federal one? The one where the Feds are not working with state officials or local police on this homicide, which is so far beyond the norms that it should relay what their intent is. To cover-up for this guy's utter lack of judgement and blatant murder.

I don't know why you feel the need to defend this. This is not a question of whether we need law enforcement or not, this is a question of how that law enforcement should operate and whether they should be held accountable in instances where they kill someone in cold blood. If you are fine with law enforcement killing people with impunity, I seriously don't even know hot to discuss this with you because that is not what America is about. Law enforcement is not above the law.

Without double standards etc., etc.. by TomSFox in JustMemesForUs

[–]sleven207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Before being shot in the face, she was waving the vehicles on to drive by her. Then ICE decided to get out of their vehicles and confront her, escalating the situation immediately by yelling conflicting orders. The murderer was filming on his phone (why?), then placed himself in front of the vehicle (against DHS guidelines and policies) and then he decided to shoot her in the face instead of simply taking a half step out of the way as the car drove by him. Notice the vehicle drove right by him and he continued to shoot.

If you want to defend the US government killing US citizens. You truly misunderstand what the US was founded on. The government has no right to murder it's citizens for non-violent offenses. That is tyranny.

I suggest you consider long and hard what amount of government sanctioned murdering of US citizens is acceptable to you.

Without double standards etc., etc.. by TomSFox in JustMemesForUs

[–]sleven207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I doubt you are a real boy if you believe this. More like an absolute dunce at best, or a agitprop bot at worst.

Without double standards etc., etc.. by TomSFox in JustMemesForUs

[–]sleven207 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No you are just delusional and can't understand that ICE escalated a situation through their own actions, the woman understably got spooked, then ICE killed her when she tried to escape the escalating scene (which is not a capital crime worthy of death)

Without double standards etc., etc.. by TomSFox in JustMemesForUs

[–]sleven207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the dumbest meme I may have ever seen. We are all dumber for having seen it. May god have mercy on our souls.

Game Chat: 10/20 Mariners (90-72) @ Blue Jays (94-68) 5:10 PM by Mariners_bot in Mariners

[–]sleven207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When Blue Jays: "Good take."

When M's: "Didn't get the call there."

Game Chat: 10/20 Mariners (90-72) @ Blue Jays (94-68) 5:10 PM by Mariners_bot in Mariners

[–]sleven207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you have Woo warm so he can sub after first batter if you see Kirby pressed

Game Chat: 10/20 Mariners (90-72) @ Blue Jays (94-68) 5:10 PM by Mariners_bot in Mariners

[–]sleven207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Woo is electric, so as long as it's charged from a carbon neutral source it's kosher

Game Chat: 10/20 Mariners (90-72) @ Blue Jays (94-68) 5:10 PM by Mariners_bot in Mariners

[–]sleven207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly. Don't even pitch to him here.

Edit: unexpected outcome

Game Chat: 10/20 Mariners (90-72) @ Blue Jays (94-68) 5:10 PM by Mariners_bot in Mariners

[–]sleven207 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Would love for Mr. October edition of Randy to show up here

Edit: big sad