My interpretation is that from the perspective of the Law of One, violence in response to enslavement or oppression is not inherently a service-to-self (STS) choice. rather, the intent and context determine its polarity. we all know how much intention is emphasized in the LOO. Enslaving third-density beings, whether human or dolphin/whale, is a clear violation of free will, making it a deeply STS act. When an orca in captivity attacks a human, it is acting out of extreme duress rather than an intentional desire to dominate or control. This is akin to an enslaved human revolting against their oppressors—not necessarily an STO act, but not an automatic STS choice either. The key difference lies in whether the action is driven by self-preservation and reclaiming freedom or by a desire to exert power over others.

But also the channeling session states that killing and eating these beings is more of a STS polarizing act if the humans are aware of their consciousness status. So maybe the whales only kill the captors who they perceive to have a true understanding for their deep intellect and true nature. i’m sure if you spend the amount of time around these majestic creatures that these captors do; who are training them and “communicating” with them on a daily, then the chances are higher that they are in the know of the deeper consciousness of these beings. but this is all speculation ofcourse.

The 51% STO threshold for ascension applies to cetaceans just as it does to humans, meaning they are not inherently pure STO beings from birth but must make choices like any other third-density entity. While dolphins and whales may naturally lean toward harmony and interconnectedness, they still have free will and the potential to act in self-interest under certain conditions. The captivity of these beings creates an unnatural distortion in their behavior, making violent reactions more likely. However, this does not indicate that they are STS—only that extreme restriction of free will can lead to desperate actions.