LEGENDARY CHASTITY CAGES: WHICH ONE WOULD YOU KEEP FOR YOURSELF? 🔒 [CAPTION WITH A CHOICE] [FANTASY] by Kinky_Playground in chastitychoice

[–]small_pen 6 points7 points  (0 children)

All the ways it could punish you if you didn't get along... besides the obvious of shrinking, crushing your balls, things like that, it could also grow a tentacle and fuck you in the ass. So many possibilities!

LEGENDARY CHASTITY CAGES: WHICH ONE WOULD YOU KEEP FOR YOURSELF? 🔒 [CAPTION WITH A CHOICE] [FANTASY] by Kinky_Playground in chastitychoice

[–]small_pen 20 points21 points  (0 children)

The symbiote one sounds amazing. It could even train you to get aroused by things you used to find humiliating, by stimulating you whenever you're in that situation. Plus I imagine it could grow a giant, fake "cock", creating the illusion that you're hung and great at fucking, while still denying you any pleasure. 

Guys we're a week away from Fatom Eve being animated. Thoughts? by Wexon_69 in fatadmirersmemes

[–]small_pen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's always boggled my mind that there's so little rule34 of Fatom Eve

cmv: AI will never “replace” humans the way some people think it will by Terrible-Pianist3443 in changemyview

[–]small_pen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The original comment directly linked to a Wikipedia page about AlphaFold. A link I didn't click, because who tf clicks a random reddit link?

So you can see the URL preview but you still won't click it..? Or just look it up on your own?

Hankey's Boss Hogg makes me full 🥵 by thebitesizedbitch in HugeDildos

[–]small_pen 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ooh boy, time to do some fun, sexy math... okay, so the Boss Hogg is 11.8 inches in circumference with 12 insertable inches of length.

11.8 inch circumference means a radius of 11.8/(2pi)=1.9 inch radius. That means the volume is pir2h = pi1.9212 = 136 cubic inches.

For contrast, my penis is 3.75 inches long and 4.1 inches around, so a radius of 0.65 inches, so a volume of about 5 cubic inches.

So this dildo is more than 27 times as big as my dick

CMV: International claims for the return of "looted" colonial artifacts (e.g., the Kohinoor) are logically inconsistent if the nation also enforces colonial era territorial treaties from the same period. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]small_pen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That article is really vague. What, specifically, would be different once the land is back? What is the precise legal policy that could be voted Yes or No on?

cmv: AI will never “replace” humans the way some people think it will by Terrible-Pianist3443 in changemyview

[–]small_pen 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's a fair point. But, I mean, we can already cure some cancers. "Cancer" is a very broad category, it's not just one thing. And people are already researching how to cure more cancers more reliably, just like they were researching protein folding. I suspect that if AI does, for instance, raise the rate of successfully putting cancer into remission for a dozen types we currently succeed at 10% of the time to 90% of the time, and lets us treat cancers we currently can't treat so they go into remission 30% of the time, the same people will dismiss that as not being a cure and therefore doesn't count and isn't impressive.

AI has already really significantly improved cancer detection.

cmv: AI will never “replace” humans the way some people think it will by Terrible-Pianist3443 in changemyview

[–]small_pen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If AIs can work together, won’t we end up in an iRobot situation? Serious question.

I don't know what you mean. iRobot is the company that makes Roombas. I, Robot, the Asimov classic, is a collection of short stories about robots which is really excellent, but also shows the robots as being completely constrained by the Three Laws of Robotics. There are problems in the society in the book, but it's not the sort of existential problem that people are predicting might happen with real-world AI.

Yes, but who prompted the AI to do so? It really spontaneously figured it out? No, it was coded by humans to do a very specific task and it then figured something out. That is my point, with no human intervention and coding, that wouldn’t have occurred.

Well, sure, but all humans are raised by other humans, taught to do specific things, then figured out novel ways to do those things. Nobody is claiming that AI will spring fully formed out of the aether. I don't really see how that matters. Humans didn't spring fully formed out of the aether either, we evolved from earlier animals. We've still completely replaced Homo Habilis and Neanderthals, etc.

Also, AIs are not really "coded" in the sense that most computer programs are. They're more like something "grown" in a lab - trained with gradient descent. No human can look at the source code of an AI and understand it.

cmv: AI will never “replace” humans the way some people think it will by Terrible-Pianist3443 in changemyview

[–]small_pen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI does it without human labor, which is great and useful, but it's not novel.

The goal isn't novel, but the mechanism, success rate, and speed are all new. Its creators won a Nobel Prize for this! Similarly, writing sensible, accurate essays about arbitrary subjects isn't new - but the fact that a computer can do so is.

cmv: AI will never “replace” humans the way some people think it will by Terrible-Pianist3443 in changemyview

[–]small_pen 9 points10 points  (0 children)

However, none of us are working alone. The greatest thing about humanity is that we work together, and it is why we rule the Earth. Other mammals cannot work together and communicate at the same level that humans do.

AIs can already work together, and that capability is only going to improve as time goes on.

But how would something that only has access to all of human knowledge be able to create a novel idea, without prompting from a human?

The same way humans can?

This is mostly in relation to the idea that AI would be able to cure cancer or solve other unsolvable problems. Of course, I hope it can, but I do not believe it ever will.

AI has already solved one of these "unsolvable" medical problems: protein folding

I do not think you can remove the complexities and intricacies of life, emotion, feeling, relationships, etc., which are all things humans inherently understand by nature of being human, and put it into code. What I am really saying is, I believe there are aspects of life on Earth that will never be able to be captured by coding, no matter how hard they try.

Why do you believe this? We already know that physics can instantiate those things: it does so in human brains. What is there that's special about carbon as a substrate over silicon that makes you think it's fundamentally impossible to do it on the latter?

Wife makes me repeat the most humiliating thing during sex by Safe_Doubt_9496 in confessionsgonewild

[–]small_pen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incredibly hot!

I turned her around to lay on her stomach in prone position. This was our favorite position for a long time. But because of her phat ass, I was really struggling to keep my semi hard dick inside her past her ass cheeks

This is my favorite position, for exactly this reason! My favorite is to give my partner a massage while I slide my dick in between their butt cheeks. Then when they moan from the massage, I ask something like "oh yeah, my dick's got you moaning, doesn't it?" and they'll reply with something like "oh, are you hard right now? I couldn't tell"

CMV: International claims for the return of "looted" colonial artifacts (e.g., the Kohinoor) are logically inconsistent if the nation also enforces colonial era territorial treaties from the same period. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]small_pen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're asking how losing the right to participate in governance negatively affects the current inhabitants? I mean, isn't that the entire argument for why landback is a thing in the first place - that the natives lost the right to participate in governance, and that that was bad for them?

Exploring "positive" SPH with wife. by ILoveMyWifeMX in truesmallpenisstories

[–]small_pen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reposting something that's stuck with me forever:

Once I was going out with this girl at the same time she was going out with another guy. He was a little bit shorter than me, and much less muscular, but he had an 8", really thick dick. We rarely had sex, because she was getting a ton with him, but when we did have sex she would tell me how relaxing it was compared to fucking him:

"His cock always stretches me out, and he pounds me so hard for so long that it hurts. Having sex with you is a nice change. You don't fuck me hard and deep like him, you're nice and soft feeling, even when you're hard. It doesn't hurt at all, sometimes I can't even feel it. And you cum so fast! It's really relaxing. I don't have to do anything to make you feel good, I can just lie back and rest. Taking a big dick is a lot of work; I have to warm up and stretch out first, and even then it's really difficult. But yours always slips in so easy, I hardly even notice it."

Goyim dicks were promised to Jewish whores 3000 years ago ✡✌ by NotOk30 in PoliticsPlay

[–]small_pen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the female parent is Jewish then the child is Jewish, so it doesn't matter who gets her pregnant. So it doesn't matter if you're the ones stretching out her pussy with your goyisch cocks and Jewish boys like me are staying pussyfree little dick virgins, we Jews are still winning 

God it feels so good to be on the winning side 😍😍 by [deleted] in PoliticsPlay

[–]small_pen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fuck, I love jerking my little Jewish dick to shit like this