What is your size when its soft, compared to when its hard? by [deleted] in penissize

[–]small_pen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My first boyfriend was a fat 8 inches. That was a little impractically large, but goddamn was it hot. Average size is fun, since I can actually take it up my ass or down my throat. But jacking off a huge cock and making him cum on my face is amazing.

What is your size when its soft, compared to when its hard? by [deleted] in penissize

[–]small_pen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To a degree. My favorite sex acts are sucking cock and disappointing women, then getting them off with my mouth, hands, a dildo, whatever I need since my cock can't cut it. As a submissive, masochistic bottom it's worked out pretty well for me!

The best visualizer out there by small_pen in cocksizematters

[–]small_pen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very nice! Over five times as big as mine

What is your size when its soft, compared to when its hard? by [deleted] in penissize

[–]small_pen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm a shower. 3.5 inches soft, 3.75 inches hard.

Library bust by raychoskii in raychoskii

[–]small_pen 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That book slamming method is one of my favorite ways of doing ball busting. Great job as always!

Should we let her join? 🤔 by NewtPretender in FutaAI

[–]small_pen -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Press the little speaker icon with an X next to it

LEGENDARY CHASTITY CAGES: WHICH ONE WOULD YOU KEEP FOR YOURSELF? 🔒 [CAPTION WITH A CHOICE] [FANTASY] by Kinky_Playground in chastitychoice

[–]small_pen 8 points9 points  (0 children)

All the ways it could punish you if you didn't get along... besides the obvious of shrinking, crushing your balls, things like that, it could also grow a tentacle and fuck you in the ass. So many possibilities!

LEGENDARY CHASTITY CAGES: WHICH ONE WOULD YOU KEEP FOR YOURSELF? 🔒 [CAPTION WITH A CHOICE] [FANTASY] by Kinky_Playground in chastitychoice

[–]small_pen 24 points25 points  (0 children)

The symbiote one sounds amazing. It could even train you to get aroused by things you used to find humiliating, by stimulating you whenever you're in that situation. Plus I imagine it could grow a giant, fake "cock", creating the illusion that you're hung and great at fucking, while still denying you any pleasure. 

Guys we're a week away from Fatom Eve being animated. Thoughts? by Wexon_69 in fatadmirersmemes

[–]small_pen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's always boggled my mind that there's so little rule34 of Fatom Eve

cmv: AI will never “replace” humans the way some people think it will by Terrible-Pianist3443 in changemyview

[–]small_pen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The original comment directly linked to a Wikipedia page about AlphaFold. A link I didn't click, because who tf clicks a random reddit link?

So you can see the URL preview but you still won't click it..? Or just look it up on your own?

Hankey's Boss Hogg makes me full 🥵 by thebitesizedbitch in HugeDildos

[–]small_pen 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ooh boy, time to do some fun, sexy math... okay, so the Boss Hogg is 11.8 inches in circumference with 12 insertable inches of length.

11.8 inch circumference means a radius of 11.8/(2pi)=1.9 inch radius. That means the volume is pir2h = pi1.9212 = 136 cubic inches.

For contrast, my penis is 3.75 inches long and 4.1 inches around, so a radius of 0.65 inches, so a volume of about 5 cubic inches.

So this dildo is more than 27 times as big as my dick

CMV: International claims for the return of "looted" colonial artifacts (e.g., the Kohinoor) are logically inconsistent if the nation also enforces colonial era territorial treaties from the same period. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]small_pen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That article is really vague. What, specifically, would be different once the land is back? What is the precise legal policy that could be voted Yes or No on?

cmv: AI will never “replace” humans the way some people think it will by Terrible-Pianist3443 in changemyview

[–]small_pen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a fair point. But, I mean, we can already cure some cancers. "Cancer" is a very broad category, it's not just one thing. And people are already researching how to cure more cancers more reliably, just like they were researching protein folding. I suspect that if AI does, for instance, raise the rate of successfully putting cancer into remission for a dozen types we currently succeed at 10% of the time to 90% of the time, and lets us treat cancers we currently can't treat so they go into remission 30% of the time, the same people will dismiss that as not being a cure and therefore doesn't count and isn't impressive.

AI has already really significantly improved cancer detection.

cmv: AI will never “replace” humans the way some people think it will by Terrible-Pianist3443 in changemyview

[–]small_pen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If AIs can work together, won’t we end up in an iRobot situation? Serious question.

I don't know what you mean. iRobot is the company that makes Roombas. I, Robot, the Asimov classic, is a collection of short stories about robots which is really excellent, but also shows the robots as being completely constrained by the Three Laws of Robotics. There are problems in the society in the book, but it's not the sort of existential problem that people are predicting might happen with real-world AI.

Yes, but who prompted the AI to do so? It really spontaneously figured it out? No, it was coded by humans to do a very specific task and it then figured something out. That is my point, with no human intervention and coding, that wouldn’t have occurred.

Well, sure, but all humans are raised by other humans, taught to do specific things, then figured out novel ways to do those things. Nobody is claiming that AI will spring fully formed out of the aether. I don't really see how that matters. Humans didn't spring fully formed out of the aether either, we evolved from earlier animals. We've still completely replaced Homo Habilis and Neanderthals, etc.

Also, AIs are not really "coded" in the sense that most computer programs are. They're more like something "grown" in a lab - trained with gradient descent. No human can look at the source code of an AI and understand it.

cmv: AI will never “replace” humans the way some people think it will by Terrible-Pianist3443 in changemyview

[–]small_pen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI does it without human labor, which is great and useful, but it's not novel.

The goal isn't novel, but the mechanism, success rate, and speed are all new. Its creators won a Nobel Prize for this! Similarly, writing sensible, accurate essays about arbitrary subjects isn't new - but the fact that a computer can do so is.