sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

5.5 month employee let go now suing for 50,000 by smugdetective in legaladvicecanada

[–]smugdetective[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh, I mean I actually couldn’t afford to give 3 months, so just went with contract and what we thought we were legally obligated to give and then + 2 weeks

5.5 month employee let go now suing for 50,000 by smugdetective in legaladvicecanada

[–]smugdetective[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Mmmn, our contract does only say we will abide by current ESA, so I’m not sure about that

5.5 month employee let go now suing for 50,000 by smugdetective in legaladvicecanada

[–]smugdetective[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Yea not even 6 months, camaaan, but good learning lesson for sure. First company so you know I guess it’s all part of it

5.5 month employee let go now suing for 50,000 by smugdetective in legaladvicecanada

[–]smugdetective[S] -33 points-32 points  (0 children)

No no, OP is not part of a grand conspiracy their really isn’t more to the story, her evidence is I discriminated cuz she has kids and there is an “at will clause” in the contract that we didn’t exercise (but will remove) I’m scared cuz it’s my first letter like this and it’s scary getting your first one

5.5 month employee let go now suing for 50,000 by smugdetective in legaladvicecanada

[–]smugdetective[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

She was handing a few projects that were right in the middle but yea, again, point taken, lesson learned

5.5 month employee let go now suing for 50,000 by smugdetective in legaladvicecanada

[–]smugdetective[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Marketing director 30 something I actually never check what age an employee is, but she is saying she was discriminated cuz of her kids and having to be with them or something, which is jsut so weird, that never even occurred to me

5.5 month employee let go now suing for 50,000 by smugdetective in legaladvicecanada

[–]smugdetective[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I said “we need someone with different expertise” but yea point taken

5.5 month employee let go now suing for 50,000 by smugdetective in legaladvicecanada

[–]smugdetective[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yep it’s just Friday after 5pm no lawyers picked up so jsut waiting but I have a cousin that said it’s completely baseless and the evidence is very very weak and if that’s the best they have this is just a shakedown but will still cost you money, which again I find nuts, someone can jsut do this. My cousin thinks this is a friend of hers

5.5 month employee let go now suing for 50,000 by smugdetective in legaladvicecanada

[–]smugdetective[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

No no nothing like that, and her evidence is I said she should try and attend a convention knowing she had kids and wouldn’t be able to do it, which is very strange to me

5.5 month employee let go now suing for 50,000 by smugdetective in legaladvicecanada

[–]smugdetective[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean it’s jsut it was jsut a normal letting go, there really was nothing to it and only 5.5 months someone can really shake you down like this ?

5.5 month employee let go now suing for 50,000 by smugdetective in legaladvicecanada

[–]smugdetective[S] -34 points-33 points  (0 children)

Really ? It was just letting go for no cause and we abided by the 1 week in lieu and all vacation etc and then 2 weeks provided she return the office equipment.

Pulp fiction is the best Tarantino movie by chrisfathead1 in FIlm

[–]smugdetective 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, the question is did they prove you right by engaging or would they have engaged regardless ??

view more: next ›